Cargando…

Effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: a randomised controlled experiment

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms found on Twitter on adult current smokers’ intention to quit smoking cigarettes, intention to purchase e-cigarettes and perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes compared with regular cigarettes. SETTING: An online...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, Caroline, Williams, Philippa, Elizarova, Olga, Dahne, Jennifer, Bian, Jiang, Zhao, Yunpeng, Tan, Andy S L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34470790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045445
_version_ 1783747736855642112
author Wright, Caroline
Williams, Philippa
Elizarova, Olga
Dahne, Jennifer
Bian, Jiang
Zhao, Yunpeng
Tan, Andy S L
author_facet Wright, Caroline
Williams, Philippa
Elizarova, Olga
Dahne, Jennifer
Bian, Jiang
Zhao, Yunpeng
Tan, Andy S L
author_sort Wright, Caroline
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms found on Twitter on adult current smokers’ intention to quit smoking cigarettes, intention to purchase e-cigarettes and perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes compared with regular cigarettes. SETTING: An online randomised controlled experiment conducted in November 2019 among USA and UK current smokers. PARTICIPANTS: 2400 adult current smokers aged ≥18 years who were not current e-cigarette users recruited from an online panel. Participants’ were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio using a least-fill randomiser function. INTERVENTIONS: Viewing 4 tweets in random order within one of four conditions: (1) e-cigarettes are just as or more harmful than smoking, (2) e-cigarettes are completely harmless, (3) e-cigarette harms are uncertain, and (4) a control condition of tweets about physical activity. PRIMARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Self-reported post-test intention to quit smoking cigarettes, intention to purchase e-cigarettes, and perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes compared with smoking. RESULTS: Among US and UK participants, after controlling for baseline measures of the outcome, exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes are as or more harmful than smoking versus control was associated with lower post-test intention to purchase e-cigarettes (β=−0.339, 95% CI −0.487 to –0.191, p<0.001) and increased post-test perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes (β=0.341, 95% CI 0.273 to 0.410, p<0.001). Among US smokers, exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes are completely harmless was associated with higher post-test intention to purchase e-cigarettes (β=0.229, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.456, p=0.048) and lower post-test perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes (β=−0.154, 95% CI −0.258 to –0.050, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: US and UK adult current smokers may be deterred from considering using e-cigarettes after brief exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes were just as or more harmful than smoking. Conversely, US adult current smokers may be encouraged to use e-cigarettes after exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes are completely harmless. These findings suggest that misinformation about e-cigarette harms may influence some adult smokers’ decisions to consider using e-cigarettes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16082420.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8413940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84139402021-09-22 Effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: a randomised controlled experiment Wright, Caroline Williams, Philippa Elizarova, Olga Dahne, Jennifer Bian, Jiang Zhao, Yunpeng Tan, Andy S L BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms found on Twitter on adult current smokers’ intention to quit smoking cigarettes, intention to purchase e-cigarettes and perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes compared with regular cigarettes. SETTING: An online randomised controlled experiment conducted in November 2019 among USA and UK current smokers. PARTICIPANTS: 2400 adult current smokers aged ≥18 years who were not current e-cigarette users recruited from an online panel. Participants’ were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio using a least-fill randomiser function. INTERVENTIONS: Viewing 4 tweets in random order within one of four conditions: (1) e-cigarettes are just as or more harmful than smoking, (2) e-cigarettes are completely harmless, (3) e-cigarette harms are uncertain, and (4) a control condition of tweets about physical activity. PRIMARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Self-reported post-test intention to quit smoking cigarettes, intention to purchase e-cigarettes, and perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes compared with smoking. RESULTS: Among US and UK participants, after controlling for baseline measures of the outcome, exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes are as or more harmful than smoking versus control was associated with lower post-test intention to purchase e-cigarettes (β=−0.339, 95% CI −0.487 to –0.191, p<0.001) and increased post-test perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes (β=0.341, 95% CI 0.273 to 0.410, p<0.001). Among US smokers, exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes are completely harmless was associated with higher post-test intention to purchase e-cigarettes (β=0.229, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.456, p=0.048) and lower post-test perceived relative harm of e-cigarettes (β=−0.154, 95% CI −0.258 to –0.050, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: US and UK adult current smokers may be deterred from considering using e-cigarettes after brief exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes were just as or more harmful than smoking. Conversely, US adult current smokers may be encouraged to use e-cigarettes after exposure to tweets that e-cigarettes are completely harmless. These findings suggest that misinformation about e-cigarette harms may influence some adult smokers’ decisions to consider using e-cigarettes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16082420. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8413940/ /pubmed/34470790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045445 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Wright, Caroline
Williams, Philippa
Elizarova, Olga
Dahne, Jennifer
Bian, Jiang
Zhao, Yunpeng
Tan, Andy S L
Effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: a randomised controlled experiment
title Effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: a randomised controlled experiment
title_full Effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: a randomised controlled experiment
title_fullStr Effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: a randomised controlled experiment
title_full_unstemmed Effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: a randomised controlled experiment
title_short Effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: a randomised controlled experiment
title_sort effects of brief exposure to misinformation about e-cigarette harms on twitter: a randomised controlled experiment
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34470790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045445
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightcaroline effectsofbriefexposuretomisinformationaboutecigaretteharmsontwitterarandomisedcontrolledexperiment
AT williamsphilippa effectsofbriefexposuretomisinformationaboutecigaretteharmsontwitterarandomisedcontrolledexperiment
AT elizarovaolga effectsofbriefexposuretomisinformationaboutecigaretteharmsontwitterarandomisedcontrolledexperiment
AT dahnejennifer effectsofbriefexposuretomisinformationaboutecigaretteharmsontwitterarandomisedcontrolledexperiment
AT bianjiang effectsofbriefexposuretomisinformationaboutecigaretteharmsontwitterarandomisedcontrolledexperiment
AT zhaoyunpeng effectsofbriefexposuretomisinformationaboutecigaretteharmsontwitterarandomisedcontrolledexperiment
AT tanandysl effectsofbriefexposuretomisinformationaboutecigaretteharmsontwitterarandomisedcontrolledexperiment