Cargando…
Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol
INTRODUCTION: Given the complex causal origins of many non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the complex landscapes in which policies designed to tackle them are made and unfold, the need for systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) in developing effective policy solutions has been emphasised....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049878 |
_version_ | 1783747737317015552 |
---|---|
author | Clifford Astbury, Chloe McGill, Elizabeth Egan, Matt Penney, Tarra L |
author_facet | Clifford Astbury, Chloe McGill, Elizabeth Egan, Matt Penney, Tarra L |
author_sort | Clifford Astbury, Chloe |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Given the complex causal origins of many non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the complex landscapes in which policies designed to tackle them are made and unfold, the need for systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) in developing effective policy solutions has been emphasised. While numerous methods informed by STCS have been applied to the policy process in NCD prevention, these applications have not been systematically catalogued. The aim of this scoping review is to identify existing applications of methods informed by STCS to the policy process for NCD prevention, documenting which domains of the policy process they have been applied to. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic scoping review methodology will be used. Identification: We will search Medline, SCOPUS, Embase and Web of Science using search terms combining STCS, NCD prevention and the policy process. All records published in English will be eligible for inclusion, regardless of study design. Selection: We will screen titles and abstracts and extract data according to published guidelines for scoping reviews. In order to determine the quality of the included studies, we will use the approach developed by Dixon-Woods et al, excluding studies identified as fatally flawed, and determining the credibility and contribution of included studies. Synthesis: We will identify relevant studies, summarising key data from each study and mapping applications of methods informed by STCS to different parts of the policy process. Review findings will provide a useful reference for policy-makers, outlining which domains of the policy process different methods have been applied to. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as the study does not involve primary data collection. The findings of this study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, presentations and summaries for key stakeholders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8413942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84139422021-09-22 Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol Clifford Astbury, Chloe McGill, Elizabeth Egan, Matt Penney, Tarra L BMJ Open Health Policy INTRODUCTION: Given the complex causal origins of many non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the complex landscapes in which policies designed to tackle them are made and unfold, the need for systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) in developing effective policy solutions has been emphasised. While numerous methods informed by STCS have been applied to the policy process in NCD prevention, these applications have not been systematically catalogued. The aim of this scoping review is to identify existing applications of methods informed by STCS to the policy process for NCD prevention, documenting which domains of the policy process they have been applied to. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic scoping review methodology will be used. Identification: We will search Medline, SCOPUS, Embase and Web of Science using search terms combining STCS, NCD prevention and the policy process. All records published in English will be eligible for inclusion, regardless of study design. Selection: We will screen titles and abstracts and extract data according to published guidelines for scoping reviews. In order to determine the quality of the included studies, we will use the approach developed by Dixon-Woods et al, excluding studies identified as fatally flawed, and determining the credibility and contribution of included studies. Synthesis: We will identify relevant studies, summarising key data from each study and mapping applications of methods informed by STCS to different parts of the policy process. Review findings will provide a useful reference for policy-makers, outlining which domains of the policy process different methods have been applied to. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as the study does not involve primary data collection. The findings of this study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, presentations and summaries for key stakeholders. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8413942/ /pubmed/34475176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049878 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Health Policy Clifford Astbury, Chloe McGill, Elizabeth Egan, Matt Penney, Tarra L Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title | Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title_full | Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title_fullStr | Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title_short | Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol |
title_sort | systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol |
topic | Health Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cliffordastburychloe systemsthinkingandcomplexitysciencemethodsandthepolicyprocessinnoncommunicablediseasepreventionasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT mcgillelizabeth systemsthinkingandcomplexitysciencemethodsandthepolicyprocessinnoncommunicablediseasepreventionasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT eganmatt systemsthinkingandcomplexitysciencemethodsandthepolicyprocessinnoncommunicablediseasepreventionasystematicscopingreviewprotocol AT penneytarral systemsthinkingandcomplexitysciencemethodsandthepolicyprocessinnoncommunicablediseasepreventionasystematicscopingreviewprotocol |