Cargando…

Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION: Given the complex causal origins of many non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the complex landscapes in which policies designed to tackle them are made and unfold, the need for systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) in developing effective policy solutions has been emphasised....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clifford Astbury, Chloe, McGill, Elizabeth, Egan, Matt, Penney, Tarra L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049878
_version_ 1783747737317015552
author Clifford Astbury, Chloe
McGill, Elizabeth
Egan, Matt
Penney, Tarra L
author_facet Clifford Astbury, Chloe
McGill, Elizabeth
Egan, Matt
Penney, Tarra L
author_sort Clifford Astbury, Chloe
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Given the complex causal origins of many non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the complex landscapes in which policies designed to tackle them are made and unfold, the need for systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) in developing effective policy solutions has been emphasised. While numerous methods informed by STCS have been applied to the policy process in NCD prevention, these applications have not been systematically catalogued. The aim of this scoping review is to identify existing applications of methods informed by STCS to the policy process for NCD prevention, documenting which domains of the policy process they have been applied to. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic scoping review methodology will be used. Identification: We will search Medline, SCOPUS, Embase and Web of Science using search terms combining STCS, NCD prevention and the policy process. All records published in English will be eligible for inclusion, regardless of study design. Selection: We will screen titles and abstracts and extract data according to published guidelines for scoping reviews. In order to determine the quality of the included studies, we will use the approach developed by Dixon-Woods et al, excluding studies identified as fatally flawed, and determining the credibility and contribution of included studies. Synthesis: We will identify relevant studies, summarising key data from each study and mapping applications of methods informed by STCS to different parts of the policy process. Review findings will provide a useful reference for policy-makers, outlining which domains of the policy process different methods have been applied to. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as the study does not involve primary data collection. The findings of this study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, presentations and summaries for key stakeholders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8413942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84139422021-09-22 Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol Clifford Astbury, Chloe McGill, Elizabeth Egan, Matt Penney, Tarra L BMJ Open Health Policy INTRODUCTION: Given the complex causal origins of many non-communicable diseases (NCDs), and the complex landscapes in which policies designed to tackle them are made and unfold, the need for systems thinking and complexity science (STCS) in developing effective policy solutions has been emphasised. While numerous methods informed by STCS have been applied to the policy process in NCD prevention, these applications have not been systematically catalogued. The aim of this scoping review is to identify existing applications of methods informed by STCS to the policy process for NCD prevention, documenting which domains of the policy process they have been applied to. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic scoping review methodology will be used. Identification: We will search Medline, SCOPUS, Embase and Web of Science using search terms combining STCS, NCD prevention and the policy process. All records published in English will be eligible for inclusion, regardless of study design. Selection: We will screen titles and abstracts and extract data according to published guidelines for scoping reviews. In order to determine the quality of the included studies, we will use the approach developed by Dixon-Woods et al, excluding studies identified as fatally flawed, and determining the credibility and contribution of included studies. Synthesis: We will identify relevant studies, summarising key data from each study and mapping applications of methods informed by STCS to different parts of the policy process. Review findings will provide a useful reference for policy-makers, outlining which domains of the policy process different methods have been applied to. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethical approval is not required, as the study does not involve primary data collection. The findings of this study will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication, presentations and summaries for key stakeholders. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8413942/ /pubmed/34475176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049878 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Policy
Clifford Astbury, Chloe
McGill, Elizabeth
Egan, Matt
Penney, Tarra L
Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol
title Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_full Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_short Systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol
title_sort systems thinking and complexity science methods and the policy process in non-communicable disease prevention: a systematic scoping review protocol
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8413942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475176
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049878
work_keys_str_mv AT cliffordastburychloe systemsthinkingandcomplexitysciencemethodsandthepolicyprocessinnoncommunicablediseasepreventionasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT mcgillelizabeth systemsthinkingandcomplexitysciencemethodsandthepolicyprocessinnoncommunicablediseasepreventionasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT eganmatt systemsthinkingandcomplexitysciencemethodsandthepolicyprocessinnoncommunicablediseasepreventionasystematicscopingreviewprotocol
AT penneytarral systemsthinkingandcomplexitysciencemethodsandthepolicyprocessinnoncommunicablediseasepreventionasystematicscopingreviewprotocol