Cargando…
A pandemic response to home delivery for ambulatory ECG monitoring: Development and validation
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a protocol was designed for mail-out devices and educational materials created to teach patients how to install a device for 2 weeks of continuous ambulatory ECG monitoring. We compared data collection from two sequential patient populations; one who received st...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33348137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.11.003 |
_version_ | 1783747763329040384 |
---|---|
author | Benjamin, Hallie Bischof, Michele Goldshtein, Daniel Fecteau, Pierre Newman, David |
author_facet | Benjamin, Hallie Bischof, Michele Goldshtein, Daniel Fecteau, Pierre Newman, David |
author_sort | Benjamin, Hallie |
collection | PubMed |
description | In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a protocol was designed for mail-out devices and educational materials created to teach patients how to install a device for 2 weeks of continuous ambulatory ECG monitoring. We compared data collection from two sequential patient populations; one who received standard device application in the same clinic in the months before the pandemic response, and another, who received their device by mail for self-installation. Patients received a single phone call when the device was mailed and were able to contact the manufacturer as needed for support. A total of 47 devices were assessed from each group. Each group was similar in age (70 vs 65 years), and clinical indication for monitoring. Noise signal magnitude (22.34 vs 26.28%), symptom based manual activation (10 vs 8 events) and APB/recorded hour burden measurements (37.05 vs 23.36%) were similar in both groups (all comparisons were statistically non-significant). Both groups had a similar mean of hours recorded (240.37 vs. 245.05 h). Zero patient kits were lost, and all reports were delivered. Overall, it was found that a mail-delivered home-based recording platform can be reliably used to acquire clinical data with similar data quality and patient compliance as a conventional in-clinic model for long term ambulatory ECG monitoring. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8414195 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84141952021-09-03 A pandemic response to home delivery for ambulatory ECG monitoring: Development and validation Benjamin, Hallie Bischof, Michele Goldshtein, Daniel Fecteau, Pierre Newman, David J Electrocardiol Article In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a protocol was designed for mail-out devices and educational materials created to teach patients how to install a device for 2 weeks of continuous ambulatory ECG monitoring. We compared data collection from two sequential patient populations; one who received standard device application in the same clinic in the months before the pandemic response, and another, who received their device by mail for self-installation. Patients received a single phone call when the device was mailed and were able to contact the manufacturer as needed for support. A total of 47 devices were assessed from each group. Each group was similar in age (70 vs 65 years), and clinical indication for monitoring. Noise signal magnitude (22.34 vs 26.28%), symptom based manual activation (10 vs 8 events) and APB/recorded hour burden measurements (37.05 vs 23.36%) were similar in both groups (all comparisons were statistically non-significant). Both groups had a similar mean of hours recorded (240.37 vs. 245.05 h). Zero patient kits were lost, and all reports were delivered. Overall, it was found that a mail-delivered home-based recording platform can be reliably used to acquire clinical data with similar data quality and patient compliance as a conventional in-clinic model for long term ambulatory ECG monitoring. Elsevier Inc. 2021 2020-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8414195/ /pubmed/33348137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.11.003 Text en © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Benjamin, Hallie Bischof, Michele Goldshtein, Daniel Fecteau, Pierre Newman, David A pandemic response to home delivery for ambulatory ECG monitoring: Development and validation |
title | A pandemic response to home delivery for ambulatory ECG monitoring: Development and validation |
title_full | A pandemic response to home delivery for ambulatory ECG monitoring: Development and validation |
title_fullStr | A pandemic response to home delivery for ambulatory ECG monitoring: Development and validation |
title_full_unstemmed | A pandemic response to home delivery for ambulatory ECG monitoring: Development and validation |
title_short | A pandemic response to home delivery for ambulatory ECG monitoring: Development and validation |
title_sort | pandemic response to home delivery for ambulatory ecg monitoring: development and validation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414195/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33348137 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.11.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benjaminhallie apandemicresponsetohomedeliveryforambulatoryecgmonitoringdevelopmentandvalidation AT bischofmichele apandemicresponsetohomedeliveryforambulatoryecgmonitoringdevelopmentandvalidation AT goldshteindaniel apandemicresponsetohomedeliveryforambulatoryecgmonitoringdevelopmentandvalidation AT fecteaupierre apandemicresponsetohomedeliveryforambulatoryecgmonitoringdevelopmentandvalidation AT newmandavid apandemicresponsetohomedeliveryforambulatoryecgmonitoringdevelopmentandvalidation AT benjaminhallie pandemicresponsetohomedeliveryforambulatoryecgmonitoringdevelopmentandvalidation AT bischofmichele pandemicresponsetohomedeliveryforambulatoryecgmonitoringdevelopmentandvalidation AT goldshteindaniel pandemicresponsetohomedeliveryforambulatoryecgmonitoringdevelopmentandvalidation AT fecteaupierre pandemicresponsetohomedeliveryforambulatoryecgmonitoringdevelopmentandvalidation AT newmandavid pandemicresponsetohomedeliveryforambulatoryecgmonitoringdevelopmentandvalidation |