Cargando…

eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Usability

BACKGROUND: eHealth has the potential to improve outcomes such as physical activity or balance in older adults receiving geriatric rehabilitation. However, several challenges such as scarce evidence on effectiveness, feasibility, and usability hinder the successful implementation of eHealth in geria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kraaijkamp, Jules J M, van Dam van Isselt, Eléonore F, Persoon, Anke, Versluis, Anke, Chavannes, Niels H, Achterberg, Wilco P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34420918
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24015
_version_ 1783747771553021952
author Kraaijkamp, Jules J M
van Dam van Isselt, Eléonore F
Persoon, Anke
Versluis, Anke
Chavannes, Niels H
Achterberg, Wilco P
author_facet Kraaijkamp, Jules J M
van Dam van Isselt, Eléonore F
Persoon, Anke
Versluis, Anke
Chavannes, Niels H
Achterberg, Wilco P
author_sort Kraaijkamp, Jules J M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: eHealth has the potential to improve outcomes such as physical activity or balance in older adults receiving geriatric rehabilitation. However, several challenges such as scarce evidence on effectiveness, feasibility, and usability hinder the successful implementation of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to assess evidence on the effectiveness, feasibility, and usability of eHealth interventions in older adults in geriatric rehabilitation. METHODS: We searched 7 databases for randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized studies, quantitative descriptive studies, qualitative research, and mixed methods studies that applied eHealth interventions during geriatric rehabilitation. Included studies investigated a combination of effectiveness, usability, and feasibility of eHealth in older patients who received geriatric rehabilitation, with a mean age of ≥70 years. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and a narrative synthesis was conducted using a harvest plot. RESULTS: In total, 40 studies were selected, with clinical heterogeneity across studies. Of 40 studies, 15 studies (38%) found eHealth was at least as effective as non-eHealth interventions (56% of the 27 studies with a control group), 11 studies (41%) found eHealth interventions were more effective than non-eHealth interventions, and 1 study (4%) reported beneficial outcomes in favor of the non-eHealth interventions. Of 17 studies, 16 (94%) concluded that eHealth was feasible. However, high exclusion rates were reported in 7 studies of 40 (18%). Of 40 studies, 4 (10%) included outcomes related to usability and indicated that there were certain aging-related barriers to cognitive ability, physical ability, or perception, which led to difficulties in using eHealth. CONCLUSIONS: eHealth can potentially improve rehabilitation outcomes for older patients receiving geriatric rehabilitation. Simple eHealth interventions were more likely to be feasible for older patients receiving geriatric rehabilitation, especially, in combination with another non-eHealth intervention. However, a lack of evidence on usability might hamper the implementation of eHealth. eHealth applications in geriatric rehabilitation show promise, but more research is required, including research with a focus on usability and participation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8414304
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84143042021-09-24 eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Usability Kraaijkamp, Jules J M van Dam van Isselt, Eléonore F Persoon, Anke Versluis, Anke Chavannes, Niels H Achterberg, Wilco P J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: eHealth has the potential to improve outcomes such as physical activity or balance in older adults receiving geriatric rehabilitation. However, several challenges such as scarce evidence on effectiveness, feasibility, and usability hinder the successful implementation of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to assess evidence on the effectiveness, feasibility, and usability of eHealth interventions in older adults in geriatric rehabilitation. METHODS: We searched 7 databases for randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized studies, quantitative descriptive studies, qualitative research, and mixed methods studies that applied eHealth interventions during geriatric rehabilitation. Included studies investigated a combination of effectiveness, usability, and feasibility of eHealth in older patients who received geriatric rehabilitation, with a mean age of ≥70 years. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and a narrative synthesis was conducted using a harvest plot. RESULTS: In total, 40 studies were selected, with clinical heterogeneity across studies. Of 40 studies, 15 studies (38%) found eHealth was at least as effective as non-eHealth interventions (56% of the 27 studies with a control group), 11 studies (41%) found eHealth interventions were more effective than non-eHealth interventions, and 1 study (4%) reported beneficial outcomes in favor of the non-eHealth interventions. Of 17 studies, 16 (94%) concluded that eHealth was feasible. However, high exclusion rates were reported in 7 studies of 40 (18%). Of 40 studies, 4 (10%) included outcomes related to usability and indicated that there were certain aging-related barriers to cognitive ability, physical ability, or perception, which led to difficulties in using eHealth. CONCLUSIONS: eHealth can potentially improve rehabilitation outcomes for older patients receiving geriatric rehabilitation. Simple eHealth interventions were more likely to be feasible for older patients receiving geriatric rehabilitation, especially, in combination with another non-eHealth intervention. However, a lack of evidence on usability might hamper the implementation of eHealth. eHealth applications in geriatric rehabilitation show promise, but more research is required, including research with a focus on usability and participation. JMIR Publications 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8414304/ /pubmed/34420918 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24015 Text en ©Jules J M Kraaijkamp, Eléonore F van Dam van Isselt, Anke Persoon, Anke Versluis, Niels H Chavannes, Wilco P Achterberg. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 19.08.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Kraaijkamp, Jules J M
van Dam van Isselt, Eléonore F
Persoon, Anke
Versluis, Anke
Chavannes, Niels H
Achterberg, Wilco P
eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Usability
title eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Usability
title_full eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Usability
title_fullStr eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Usability
title_full_unstemmed eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Usability
title_short eHealth in Geriatric Rehabilitation: Systematic Review of Effectiveness, Feasibility, and Usability
title_sort ehealth in geriatric rehabilitation: systematic review of effectiveness, feasibility, and usability
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414304/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34420918
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/24015
work_keys_str_mv AT kraaijkampjulesjm ehealthingeriatricrehabilitationsystematicreviewofeffectivenessfeasibilityandusability
AT vandamvanisselteleonoref ehealthingeriatricrehabilitationsystematicreviewofeffectivenessfeasibilityandusability
AT persoonanke ehealthingeriatricrehabilitationsystematicreviewofeffectivenessfeasibilityandusability
AT versluisanke ehealthingeriatricrehabilitationsystematicreviewofeffectivenessfeasibilityandusability
AT chavannesnielsh ehealthingeriatricrehabilitationsystematicreviewofeffectivenessfeasibilityandusability
AT achterbergwilcop ehealthingeriatricrehabilitationsystematicreviewofeffectivenessfeasibilityandusability