Cargando…
Laboratory Testing Implications of Risk-Stratification and Management of COVID-19 Patients
Objective: To distinguish COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia patients and classify COVID-19 patients into low-risk and high-risk at admission by laboratory indicators. Materials and methods: In this retrospective cohort, a total of 3,563 COVID-19 patients and 118 non-COVID-19 pneumon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.699706 |
_version_ | 1783747799971528704 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Caidong Wang, Ziyu Wu, Wei Xiang, Changgang Wu, Lingxiang Li, Jie Hou, Weiye Sun, Huiling Wang, Youli Nie, Zhenling Gao, Yingdong Zhang, Ruisheng Tang, Haixia Wang, Qianghu Li, Kening Xia, Xinyi Li, Pengping Wang, Shukui |
author_facet | Liu, Caidong Wang, Ziyu Wu, Wei Xiang, Changgang Wu, Lingxiang Li, Jie Hou, Weiye Sun, Huiling Wang, Youli Nie, Zhenling Gao, Yingdong Zhang, Ruisheng Tang, Haixia Wang, Qianghu Li, Kening Xia, Xinyi Li, Pengping Wang, Shukui |
author_sort | Liu, Caidong |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To distinguish COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia patients and classify COVID-19 patients into low-risk and high-risk at admission by laboratory indicators. Materials and methods: In this retrospective cohort, a total of 3,563 COVID-19 patients and 118 non-COVID-19 pneumonia patients were included. There are two cohorts of COVID-19 patients, including 548 patients in the training dataset, and 3,015 patients in the testing dataset. Laboratory indicators were measured during hospitalization for all patients. Based on laboratory indicators, we used the support vector machine and joint random sampling to risk stratification for COVID-19 patients at admission. Based on laboratory indicators detected within the 1st week after admission, we used logistic regression and joint random sampling to develop the survival mode. The laboratory indicators of COVID-10 and non-COVID-19 were also compared. Results: We first identified the significant laboratory indicators related to the severity of COVID-19 in the training dataset. Neutrophils percentage, lymphocytes percentage, creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen with AUC >0.7 were included in the model. These indicators were further used to build a support vector machine model to classify patients into low-risk and high-risk at admission in the testing dataset. Results showed that this model could stratify the patients in the testing dataset effectively (AUC = 0.89). Our model still has good performance at different times (Mean AUC: 0.71, 0.72, 0.72, respectively for 3, 5, and 7 days after admission). Moreover, laboratory indicators detected within the 1st week after admission were able to estimate the probability of death (AUC = 0.95). We identified six indicators with permutation p < 0.05, including eosinophil percentage (p = 0.007), white blood cell count (p = 0.045), albumin (p = 0.041), aspartate transaminase (p = 0.043), lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.002), and hemoglobin (p = 0.031). We could diagnose COVID-19 and differentiate it from other kinds of viral pneumonia based on these laboratory indicators. Conclusions: Our risk-stratification model based on laboratory indicators could help to diagnose, monitor, and predict severity at an early stage of COVID-19. In addition, laboratory findings could be used to distinguish COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8414546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84145462021-09-04 Laboratory Testing Implications of Risk-Stratification and Management of COVID-19 Patients Liu, Caidong Wang, Ziyu Wu, Wei Xiang, Changgang Wu, Lingxiang Li, Jie Hou, Weiye Sun, Huiling Wang, Youli Nie, Zhenling Gao, Yingdong Zhang, Ruisheng Tang, Haixia Wang, Qianghu Li, Kening Xia, Xinyi Li, Pengping Wang, Shukui Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Objective: To distinguish COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia patients and classify COVID-19 patients into low-risk and high-risk at admission by laboratory indicators. Materials and methods: In this retrospective cohort, a total of 3,563 COVID-19 patients and 118 non-COVID-19 pneumonia patients were included. There are two cohorts of COVID-19 patients, including 548 patients in the training dataset, and 3,015 patients in the testing dataset. Laboratory indicators were measured during hospitalization for all patients. Based on laboratory indicators, we used the support vector machine and joint random sampling to risk stratification for COVID-19 patients at admission. Based on laboratory indicators detected within the 1st week after admission, we used logistic regression and joint random sampling to develop the survival mode. The laboratory indicators of COVID-10 and non-COVID-19 were also compared. Results: We first identified the significant laboratory indicators related to the severity of COVID-19 in the training dataset. Neutrophils percentage, lymphocytes percentage, creatinine, and blood urea nitrogen with AUC >0.7 were included in the model. These indicators were further used to build a support vector machine model to classify patients into low-risk and high-risk at admission in the testing dataset. Results showed that this model could stratify the patients in the testing dataset effectively (AUC = 0.89). Our model still has good performance at different times (Mean AUC: 0.71, 0.72, 0.72, respectively for 3, 5, and 7 days after admission). Moreover, laboratory indicators detected within the 1st week after admission were able to estimate the probability of death (AUC = 0.95). We identified six indicators with permutation p < 0.05, including eosinophil percentage (p = 0.007), white blood cell count (p = 0.045), albumin (p = 0.041), aspartate transaminase (p = 0.043), lactate dehydrogenase (p = 0.002), and hemoglobin (p = 0.031). We could diagnose COVID-19 and differentiate it from other kinds of viral pneumonia based on these laboratory indicators. Conclusions: Our risk-stratification model based on laboratory indicators could help to diagnose, monitor, and predict severity at an early stage of COVID-19. In addition, laboratory findings could be used to distinguish COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8414546/ /pubmed/34485335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.699706 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liu, Wang, Wu, Xiang, Wu, Li, Hou, Sun, Wang, Nie, Gao, Zhang, Tang, Wang, Li, Xia, Li and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Liu, Caidong Wang, Ziyu Wu, Wei Xiang, Changgang Wu, Lingxiang Li, Jie Hou, Weiye Sun, Huiling Wang, Youli Nie, Zhenling Gao, Yingdong Zhang, Ruisheng Tang, Haixia Wang, Qianghu Li, Kening Xia, Xinyi Li, Pengping Wang, Shukui Laboratory Testing Implications of Risk-Stratification and Management of COVID-19 Patients |
title | Laboratory Testing Implications of Risk-Stratification and Management of COVID-19 Patients |
title_full | Laboratory Testing Implications of Risk-Stratification and Management of COVID-19 Patients |
title_fullStr | Laboratory Testing Implications of Risk-Stratification and Management of COVID-19 Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Laboratory Testing Implications of Risk-Stratification and Management of COVID-19 Patients |
title_short | Laboratory Testing Implications of Risk-Stratification and Management of COVID-19 Patients |
title_sort | laboratory testing implications of risk-stratification and management of covid-19 patients |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485335 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.699706 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liucaidong laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT wangziyu laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT wuwei laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT xiangchanggang laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT wulingxiang laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT lijie laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT houweiye laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT sunhuiling laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT wangyouli laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT niezhenling laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT gaoyingdong laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT zhangruisheng laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT tanghaixia laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT wangqianghu laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT likening laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT xiaxinyi laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT lipengping laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients AT wangshukui laboratorytestingimplicationsofriskstratificationandmanagementofcovid19patients |