Cargando…

Longitudinal trends in screening males and females for intimate partner violence as part of a systemic multi-specialty health system intervention

OBJECTIVE: To assess intimate partner violence screening for males and females in a health system that underwent a systemic intervention to improve survivor identification and response. Electronic health record data from 13 clinics were accessed for February of 2017, 2018, and 2019 to calculate scre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Cari Jo, Renner, Lynette M., Wang, Qi, Flowers, Nyla I., Morrow, Grace, Logeais, Mary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34479644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05754-x
_version_ 1783747836369698816
author Clark, Cari Jo
Renner, Lynette M.
Wang, Qi
Flowers, Nyla I.
Morrow, Grace
Logeais, Mary
author_facet Clark, Cari Jo
Renner, Lynette M.
Wang, Qi
Flowers, Nyla I.
Morrow, Grace
Logeais, Mary
author_sort Clark, Cari Jo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess intimate partner violence screening for males and females in a health system that underwent a systemic intervention to improve survivor identification and response. Electronic health record data from 13 clinics were accessed for February of 2017, 2018, and 2019 to calculate screening rates and positive screening rates for intimate partner violence by clinic and sex-race groups (n  =  11,693 non-Hispanic White females; n  =  4318 Other females; n  =  9184 non-Hispanic White males; n  =  3441 Other males). Linear mixed effects models were used to examine whether screening rates differed significantly over time and by sex-race group. RESULTS: Screening rates were 31% for the first 2 years and 16% for 2019. Screening rates varied greatly by clinic. Dermatology, psychiatry, and otolaryngology clinics had average or above screening rates all 3 years. Differences in screening rates across sex-race groups were minimal. Average positive screen rates were 1.3%, 0.4%, and 2.6% in 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively, with psychiatry having the highest positive screen rate. Positive screen rates were highest for non-Hispanic White females (3.5%). Universal screening in this health system was not yielding survivors comparable to existing estimates among clinic-based populations. Other identification approaches require testing to effectively identify survivors within the health sector.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8414722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84147222021-09-09 Longitudinal trends in screening males and females for intimate partner violence as part of a systemic multi-specialty health system intervention Clark, Cari Jo Renner, Lynette M. Wang, Qi Flowers, Nyla I. Morrow, Grace Logeais, Mary BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: To assess intimate partner violence screening for males and females in a health system that underwent a systemic intervention to improve survivor identification and response. Electronic health record data from 13 clinics were accessed for February of 2017, 2018, and 2019 to calculate screening rates and positive screening rates for intimate partner violence by clinic and sex-race groups (n  =  11,693 non-Hispanic White females; n  =  4318 Other females; n  =  9184 non-Hispanic White males; n  =  3441 Other males). Linear mixed effects models were used to examine whether screening rates differed significantly over time and by sex-race group. RESULTS: Screening rates were 31% for the first 2 years and 16% for 2019. Screening rates varied greatly by clinic. Dermatology, psychiatry, and otolaryngology clinics had average or above screening rates all 3 years. Differences in screening rates across sex-race groups were minimal. Average positive screen rates were 1.3%, 0.4%, and 2.6% in 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively, with psychiatry having the highest positive screen rate. Positive screen rates were highest for non-Hispanic White females (3.5%). Universal screening in this health system was not yielding survivors comparable to existing estimates among clinic-based populations. Other identification approaches require testing to effectively identify survivors within the health sector. BioMed Central 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8414722/ /pubmed/34479644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05754-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Note
Clark, Cari Jo
Renner, Lynette M.
Wang, Qi
Flowers, Nyla I.
Morrow, Grace
Logeais, Mary
Longitudinal trends in screening males and females for intimate partner violence as part of a systemic multi-specialty health system intervention
title Longitudinal trends in screening males and females for intimate partner violence as part of a systemic multi-specialty health system intervention
title_full Longitudinal trends in screening males and females for intimate partner violence as part of a systemic multi-specialty health system intervention
title_fullStr Longitudinal trends in screening males and females for intimate partner violence as part of a systemic multi-specialty health system intervention
title_full_unstemmed Longitudinal trends in screening males and females for intimate partner violence as part of a systemic multi-specialty health system intervention
title_short Longitudinal trends in screening males and females for intimate partner violence as part of a systemic multi-specialty health system intervention
title_sort longitudinal trends in screening males and females for intimate partner violence as part of a systemic multi-specialty health system intervention
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34479644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05754-x
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkcarijo longitudinaltrendsinscreeningmalesandfemalesforintimatepartnerviolenceaspartofasystemicmultispecialtyhealthsystemintervention
AT rennerlynettem longitudinaltrendsinscreeningmalesandfemalesforintimatepartnerviolenceaspartofasystemicmultispecialtyhealthsystemintervention
AT wangqi longitudinaltrendsinscreeningmalesandfemalesforintimatepartnerviolenceaspartofasystemicmultispecialtyhealthsystemintervention
AT flowersnylai longitudinaltrendsinscreeningmalesandfemalesforintimatepartnerviolenceaspartofasystemicmultispecialtyhealthsystemintervention
AT morrowgrace longitudinaltrendsinscreeningmalesandfemalesforintimatepartnerviolenceaspartofasystemicmultispecialtyhealthsystemintervention
AT logeaismary longitudinaltrendsinscreeningmalesandfemalesforintimatepartnerviolenceaspartofasystemicmultispecialtyhealthsystemintervention