Cargando…
Computer-Assisted Versus Manual Planning for Stereotactic Brain Biopsy: A Retrospective Comparative Pilot Study
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic brain biopsy is among the most common neurosurgical procedures. Planning an optimally safe surgical trajectory requires careful attention to a number of features including the following: (1) traversing the skull perpendicularly; (2) minimizing trajectory length; and (3) avoi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31381800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz177 |
_version_ | 1783747871794790400 |
---|---|
author | Marcus, Hani J Vakharia, Vejay N Sparks, Rachel Rodionov, Roman Kitchen, Neil McEvoy, Andrew W Miserocchi, Anna Thorne, Lewis Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, John S |
author_facet | Marcus, Hani J Vakharia, Vejay N Sparks, Rachel Rodionov, Roman Kitchen, Neil McEvoy, Andrew W Miserocchi, Anna Thorne, Lewis Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, John S |
author_sort | Marcus, Hani J |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Stereotactic brain biopsy is among the most common neurosurgical procedures. Planning an optimally safe surgical trajectory requires careful attention to a number of features including the following: (1) traversing the skull perpendicularly; (2) minimizing trajectory length; and (3) avoiding critical neurovascular structures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a platform, SurgiNav, for automated trajectory planning in stereotactic brain biopsy. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was searched between February and August 2017 to identify all adult patients who underwent stereotactic brain biopsy and for whom postoperative imaging was available. In each case, the standard preoperative, T1-weighted, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was used to generate a model of the cortex. A surgical trajectory was then generated using computer-assisted planning (CAP) , and metrics of the trajectory were compared to the trajectory of the previously implemented manual plan (MP). RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients were identified. Feasible trajectories were generated using CAP in all patients, and the mean angle determined using CAP was more perpendicular to the skull than using MP (10.0° vs 14.6° from orthogonal; P = .07), the mean trajectory length was shorter (38.5 vs 43.5 mm; P = .01), and the risk score was lower (0.27 vs 0.52; P = .03). CONCLUSION: CAP for stereotactic brain biopsy appears feasible and may be safer in selected cases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8414905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84149052021-09-09 Computer-Assisted Versus Manual Planning for Stereotactic Brain Biopsy: A Retrospective Comparative Pilot Study Marcus, Hani J Vakharia, Vejay N Sparks, Rachel Rodionov, Roman Kitchen, Neil McEvoy, Andrew W Miserocchi, Anna Thorne, Lewis Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, John S Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Technique Assessment BACKGROUND: Stereotactic brain biopsy is among the most common neurosurgical procedures. Planning an optimally safe surgical trajectory requires careful attention to a number of features including the following: (1) traversing the skull perpendicularly; (2) minimizing trajectory length; and (3) avoiding critical neurovascular structures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a platform, SurgiNav, for automated trajectory planning in stereotactic brain biopsy. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was searched between February and August 2017 to identify all adult patients who underwent stereotactic brain biopsy and for whom postoperative imaging was available. In each case, the standard preoperative, T1-weighted, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was used to generate a model of the cortex. A surgical trajectory was then generated using computer-assisted planning (CAP) , and metrics of the trajectory were compared to the trajectory of the previously implemented manual plan (MP). RESULTS: Fifteen consecutive patients were identified. Feasible trajectories were generated using CAP in all patients, and the mean angle determined using CAP was more perpendicular to the skull than using MP (10.0° vs 14.6° from orthogonal; P = .07), the mean trajectory length was shorter (38.5 vs 43.5 mm; P = .01), and the risk score was lower (0.27 vs 0.52; P = .03). CONCLUSION: CAP for stereotactic brain biopsy appears feasible and may be safer in selected cases. Oxford University Press 2019-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8414905/ /pubmed/31381800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz177 Text en © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Technique Assessment Marcus, Hani J Vakharia, Vejay N Sparks, Rachel Rodionov, Roman Kitchen, Neil McEvoy, Andrew W Miserocchi, Anna Thorne, Lewis Ourselin, Sebastien Duncan, John S Computer-Assisted Versus Manual Planning for Stereotactic Brain Biopsy: A Retrospective Comparative Pilot Study |
title | Computer-Assisted Versus Manual Planning for Stereotactic Brain Biopsy: A
Retrospective Comparative Pilot Study |
title_full | Computer-Assisted Versus Manual Planning for Stereotactic Brain Biopsy: A
Retrospective Comparative Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Computer-Assisted Versus Manual Planning for Stereotactic Brain Biopsy: A
Retrospective Comparative Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Computer-Assisted Versus Manual Planning for Stereotactic Brain Biopsy: A
Retrospective Comparative Pilot Study |
title_short | Computer-Assisted Versus Manual Planning for Stereotactic Brain Biopsy: A
Retrospective Comparative Pilot Study |
title_sort | computer-assisted versus manual planning for stereotactic brain biopsy: a
retrospective comparative pilot study |
topic | Technique Assessment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8414905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31381800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ons/opz177 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcushanij computerassistedversusmanualplanningforstereotacticbrainbiopsyaretrospectivecomparativepilotstudy AT vakhariavejayn computerassistedversusmanualplanningforstereotacticbrainbiopsyaretrospectivecomparativepilotstudy AT sparksrachel computerassistedversusmanualplanningforstereotacticbrainbiopsyaretrospectivecomparativepilotstudy AT rodionovroman computerassistedversusmanualplanningforstereotacticbrainbiopsyaretrospectivecomparativepilotstudy AT kitchenneil computerassistedversusmanualplanningforstereotacticbrainbiopsyaretrospectivecomparativepilotstudy AT mcevoyandreww computerassistedversusmanualplanningforstereotacticbrainbiopsyaretrospectivecomparativepilotstudy AT miserocchianna computerassistedversusmanualplanningforstereotacticbrainbiopsyaretrospectivecomparativepilotstudy AT thornelewis computerassistedversusmanualplanningforstereotacticbrainbiopsyaretrospectivecomparativepilotstudy AT ourselinsebastien computerassistedversusmanualplanningforstereotacticbrainbiopsyaretrospectivecomparativepilotstudy AT duncanjohns computerassistedversusmanualplanningforstereotacticbrainbiopsyaretrospectivecomparativepilotstudy |