Cargando…
Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection
Intense micro-focus X-ray beamlines available at synchrotron facilities have achieved high-quality data collection even from the microcrystals of membrane proteins. The automatic data collection system developed at SPring-8, named ZOO, has contributed to many structure determinations of membrane pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521008067 |
_version_ | 1783747946435575808 |
---|---|
author | Baba, Seiki Matsuura, Hiroaki Kawamura, Takashi Sakai, Naoki Nakamura, Yuki Kawano, Yoshiaki Mizuno, Nobuhiro Kumasaka, Takashi Yamamoto, Masaki Hirata, Kunio |
author_facet | Baba, Seiki Matsuura, Hiroaki Kawamura, Takashi Sakai, Naoki Nakamura, Yuki Kawano, Yoshiaki Mizuno, Nobuhiro Kumasaka, Takashi Yamamoto, Masaki Hirata, Kunio |
author_sort | Baba, Seiki |
collection | PubMed |
description | Intense micro-focus X-ray beamlines available at synchrotron facilities have achieved high-quality data collection even from the microcrystals of membrane proteins. The automatic data collection system developed at SPring-8, named ZOO, has contributed to many structure determinations of membrane proteins using small-wedge synchrotron crystallography (SWSX) datasets. The ‘small-wedge’ (5–20°) datasets are collected from multiple crystals and then merged to obtain the final structure factors. To our knowledge, no systematic investigation on the dose dependence of data accuracy has so far been reported for SWSX, which is between ‘serial crystallography’ and ‘rotation crystallography’. Thus, herein, we investigated the optimal dose conditions for experimental phasing with SWSX. Phase determination using anomalous scattering signals was found to be more difficult at higher doses. Furthermore, merging more homogeneous datasets grouped by hierarchical clustering with controlled doses mildly reduced the negative factors in data collection, such as ‘lack of signal’ and ‘radiation damage’. In turn, as more datasets were merged, more probable phases could be obtained across a wider range of doses. Therefore, our findings show that it is essential to choose a lower dose than 10 MGy for de novo structure determination by SWSX. In particular, data collection using a dose of 5 MGy proved to be optimal in balancing the amount of signal available while reducing the amount of damage as much as possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8415328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | International Union of Crystallography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84153282021-09-16 Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection Baba, Seiki Matsuura, Hiroaki Kawamura, Takashi Sakai, Naoki Nakamura, Yuki Kawano, Yoshiaki Mizuno, Nobuhiro Kumasaka, Takashi Yamamoto, Masaki Hirata, Kunio J Synchrotron Radiat Radiation Damage Intense micro-focus X-ray beamlines available at synchrotron facilities have achieved high-quality data collection even from the microcrystals of membrane proteins. The automatic data collection system developed at SPring-8, named ZOO, has contributed to many structure determinations of membrane proteins using small-wedge synchrotron crystallography (SWSX) datasets. The ‘small-wedge’ (5–20°) datasets are collected from multiple crystals and then merged to obtain the final structure factors. To our knowledge, no systematic investigation on the dose dependence of data accuracy has so far been reported for SWSX, which is between ‘serial crystallography’ and ‘rotation crystallography’. Thus, herein, we investigated the optimal dose conditions for experimental phasing with SWSX. Phase determination using anomalous scattering signals was found to be more difficult at higher doses. Furthermore, merging more homogeneous datasets grouped by hierarchical clustering with controlled doses mildly reduced the negative factors in data collection, such as ‘lack of signal’ and ‘radiation damage’. In turn, as more datasets were merged, more probable phases could be obtained across a wider range of doses. Therefore, our findings show that it is essential to choose a lower dose than 10 MGy for de novo structure determination by SWSX. In particular, data collection using a dose of 5 MGy proved to be optimal in balancing the amount of signal available while reducing the amount of damage as much as possible. International Union of Crystallography 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8415328/ /pubmed/34475278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521008067 Text en © Seiki Baba et al. 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Damage Baba, Seiki Matsuura, Hiroaki Kawamura, Takashi Sakai, Naoki Nakamura, Yuki Kawano, Yoshiaki Mizuno, Nobuhiro Kumasaka, Takashi Yamamoto, Masaki Hirata, Kunio Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection |
title | Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection |
title_full | Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection |
title_fullStr | Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection |
title_full_unstemmed | Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection |
title_short | Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection |
title_sort | guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection |
topic | Radiation Damage |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521008067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT babaseiki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection AT matsuurahiroaki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection AT kawamuratakashi guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection AT sakainaoki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection AT nakamurayuki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection AT kawanoyoshiaki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection AT mizunonobuhiro guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection AT kumasakatakashi guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection AT yamamotomasaki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection AT hiratakunio guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection |