Cargando…

Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection

Intense micro-focus X-ray beamlines available at synchrotron facilities have achieved high-quality data collection even from the microcrystals of membrane proteins. The automatic data collection system developed at SPring-8, named ZOO, has contributed to many structure determinations of membrane pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baba, Seiki, Matsuura, Hiroaki, Kawamura, Takashi, Sakai, Naoki, Nakamura, Yuki, Kawano, Yoshiaki, Mizuno, Nobuhiro, Kumasaka, Takashi, Yamamoto, Masaki, Hirata, Kunio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521008067
_version_ 1783747946435575808
author Baba, Seiki
Matsuura, Hiroaki
Kawamura, Takashi
Sakai, Naoki
Nakamura, Yuki
Kawano, Yoshiaki
Mizuno, Nobuhiro
Kumasaka, Takashi
Yamamoto, Masaki
Hirata, Kunio
author_facet Baba, Seiki
Matsuura, Hiroaki
Kawamura, Takashi
Sakai, Naoki
Nakamura, Yuki
Kawano, Yoshiaki
Mizuno, Nobuhiro
Kumasaka, Takashi
Yamamoto, Masaki
Hirata, Kunio
author_sort Baba, Seiki
collection PubMed
description Intense micro-focus X-ray beamlines available at synchrotron facilities have achieved high-quality data collection even from the microcrystals of membrane proteins. The automatic data collection system developed at SPring-8, named ZOO, has contributed to many structure determinations of membrane proteins using small-wedge synchrotron crystallography (SWSX) datasets. The ‘small-wedge’ (5–20°) datasets are collected from multiple crystals and then merged to obtain the final structure factors. To our knowledge, no systematic investigation on the dose dependence of data accuracy has so far been reported for SWSX, which is between ‘serial crystallography’ and ‘rotation crystallography’. Thus, herein, we investigated the optimal dose conditions for experimental phasing with SWSX. Phase determination using anomalous scattering signals was found to be more difficult at higher doses. Furthermore, merging more homogeneous datasets grouped by hierarchical clustering with controlled doses mildly reduced the negative factors in data collection, such as ‘lack of signal’ and ‘radiation damage’. In turn, as more datasets were merged, more probable phases could be obtained across a wider range of doses. Therefore, our findings show that it is essential to choose a lower dose than 10 MGy for de novo structure determination by SWSX. In particular, data collection using a dose of 5 MGy proved to be optimal in balancing the amount of signal available while reducing the amount of damage as much as possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8415328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84153282021-09-16 Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection Baba, Seiki Matsuura, Hiroaki Kawamura, Takashi Sakai, Naoki Nakamura, Yuki Kawano, Yoshiaki Mizuno, Nobuhiro Kumasaka, Takashi Yamamoto, Masaki Hirata, Kunio J Synchrotron Radiat Radiation Damage Intense micro-focus X-ray beamlines available at synchrotron facilities have achieved high-quality data collection even from the microcrystals of membrane proteins. The automatic data collection system developed at SPring-8, named ZOO, has contributed to many structure determinations of membrane proteins using small-wedge synchrotron crystallography (SWSX) datasets. The ‘small-wedge’ (5–20°) datasets are collected from multiple crystals and then merged to obtain the final structure factors. To our knowledge, no systematic investigation on the dose dependence of data accuracy has so far been reported for SWSX, which is between ‘serial crystallography’ and ‘rotation crystallography’. Thus, herein, we investigated the optimal dose conditions for experimental phasing with SWSX. Phase determination using anomalous scattering signals was found to be more difficult at higher doses. Furthermore, merging more homogeneous datasets grouped by hierarchical clustering with controlled doses mildly reduced the negative factors in data collection, such as ‘lack of signal’ and ‘radiation damage’. In turn, as more datasets were merged, more probable phases could be obtained across a wider range of doses. Therefore, our findings show that it is essential to choose a lower dose than 10 MGy for de novo structure determination by SWSX. In particular, data collection using a dose of 5 MGy proved to be optimal in balancing the amount of signal available while reducing the amount of damage as much as possible. International Union of Crystallography 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8415328/ /pubmed/34475278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521008067 Text en © Seiki Baba et al. 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Damage
Baba, Seiki
Matsuura, Hiroaki
Kawamura, Takashi
Sakai, Naoki
Nakamura, Yuki
Kawano, Yoshiaki
Mizuno, Nobuhiro
Kumasaka, Takashi
Yamamoto, Masaki
Hirata, Kunio
Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection
title Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection
title_full Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection
title_fullStr Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection
title_short Guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection
title_sort guidelines for de novo phasing using multiple small-wedge data collection
topic Radiation Damage
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34475278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577521008067
work_keys_str_mv AT babaseiki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection
AT matsuurahiroaki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection
AT kawamuratakashi guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection
AT sakainaoki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection
AT nakamurayuki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection
AT kawanoyoshiaki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection
AT mizunonobuhiro guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection
AT kumasakatakashi guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection
AT yamamotomasaki guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection
AT hiratakunio guidelinesfordenovophasingusingmultiplesmallwedgedatacollection