Cargando…

Facial Cartilaginous Reconstruction—A Historical Perspective, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions

Importance: Reconstruction of facial deformity poses a significant surgical challenge due to the psychological, functional, and aesthetic importance of this anatomical area. There is a need to provide not only an excellent colour and contour match for skin defects, but also a durable cartilaginous s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jessop, Zita M., Hague, Adam, Dobbs, Thomas D., Stewart, Kenneth J., Whitaker, Iain S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.680186
_version_ 1783747971434676224
author Jessop, Zita M.
Hague, Adam
Dobbs, Thomas D.
Stewart, Kenneth J.
Whitaker, Iain S.
author_facet Jessop, Zita M.
Hague, Adam
Dobbs, Thomas D.
Stewart, Kenneth J.
Whitaker, Iain S.
author_sort Jessop, Zita M.
collection PubMed
description Importance: Reconstruction of facial deformity poses a significant surgical challenge due to the psychological, functional, and aesthetic importance of this anatomical area. There is a need to provide not only an excellent colour and contour match for skin defects, but also a durable cartilaginous structural replacement for nasal or auricular defects. The purpose of this review is to describe the history of, and state-of-the-art techniques within, facial cartilaginous surgery, whilst highlighting recent advances and future directions for this continually advancing specialty. Observations: Limitations of synthetic implants for nasal and auricular reconstruction, such as silicone and porous polyethylene, have meant that autologous cartilage tissue for such cases remains the current gold standard. Similarly, tissue engineering approaches using unrelated cells and synthetic scaffolds have shown limited in vivo success. There is increasing recognition that both the intrinsic and extrinsic microenvironment are important for tissue engineering and synthetic scaffolds fail to provide the necessary cues for cartilage matrix secretion. Conclusions and Relevance: We discuss the first-in-man studies in the context of biomimetic and developmental approaches to engineering durable cartilage for clinical translation. Implementation of engineered autologous tissue into clinical practise could eliminate donor site morbidity and represent the next phase of the facial reconstruction evolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8415446
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84154462021-09-04 Facial Cartilaginous Reconstruction—A Historical Perspective, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions Jessop, Zita M. Hague, Adam Dobbs, Thomas D. Stewart, Kenneth J. Whitaker, Iain S. Front Surg Surgery Importance: Reconstruction of facial deformity poses a significant surgical challenge due to the psychological, functional, and aesthetic importance of this anatomical area. There is a need to provide not only an excellent colour and contour match for skin defects, but also a durable cartilaginous structural replacement for nasal or auricular defects. The purpose of this review is to describe the history of, and state-of-the-art techniques within, facial cartilaginous surgery, whilst highlighting recent advances and future directions for this continually advancing specialty. Observations: Limitations of synthetic implants for nasal and auricular reconstruction, such as silicone and porous polyethylene, have meant that autologous cartilage tissue for such cases remains the current gold standard. Similarly, tissue engineering approaches using unrelated cells and synthetic scaffolds have shown limited in vivo success. There is increasing recognition that both the intrinsic and extrinsic microenvironment are important for tissue engineering and synthetic scaffolds fail to provide the necessary cues for cartilage matrix secretion. Conclusions and Relevance: We discuss the first-in-man studies in the context of biomimetic and developmental approaches to engineering durable cartilage for clinical translation. Implementation of engineered autologous tissue into clinical practise could eliminate donor site morbidity and represent the next phase of the facial reconstruction evolution. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8415446/ /pubmed/34485372 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.680186 Text en Copyright © 2021 Jessop, Hague, Dobbs, Stewart and Whitaker. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Jessop, Zita M.
Hague, Adam
Dobbs, Thomas D.
Stewart, Kenneth J.
Whitaker, Iain S.
Facial Cartilaginous Reconstruction—A Historical Perspective, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions
title Facial Cartilaginous Reconstruction—A Historical Perspective, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions
title_full Facial Cartilaginous Reconstruction—A Historical Perspective, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions
title_fullStr Facial Cartilaginous Reconstruction—A Historical Perspective, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions
title_full_unstemmed Facial Cartilaginous Reconstruction—A Historical Perspective, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions
title_short Facial Cartilaginous Reconstruction—A Historical Perspective, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions
title_sort facial cartilaginous reconstruction—a historical perspective, state-of-the-art, and future directions
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415446/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485372
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.680186
work_keys_str_mv AT jessopzitam facialcartilaginousreconstructionahistoricalperspectivestateoftheartandfuturedirections
AT hagueadam facialcartilaginousreconstructionahistoricalperspectivestateoftheartandfuturedirections
AT dobbsthomasd facialcartilaginousreconstructionahistoricalperspectivestateoftheartandfuturedirections
AT stewartkennethj facialcartilaginousreconstructionahistoricalperspectivestateoftheartandfuturedirections
AT whitakeriains facialcartilaginousreconstructionahistoricalperspectivestateoftheartandfuturedirections