Cargando…

Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Hemorrhoidectomy in Outpatients Setting

Introduction: Single or double prolapsed pile instead of full muco-hemorrhoidal prolapse is a common finding in patients with symptomatic III or IV degree hemorrhoids. For this selected group of patients, relief of symptoms could be achieved by managing the single/double prolapsed piles instead of p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomasicchio, Giovanni, Martines, Gennaro, Lantone, Giuliano, Dibra, Rigers, Trigiante, Giuseppe, De Fazio, Michele, Picciariello, Arcangelo, Altomare, Donato Francesco, Rinaldi, Marcella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.708051
_version_ 1783747972380491776
author Tomasicchio, Giovanni
Martines, Gennaro
Lantone, Giuliano
Dibra, Rigers
Trigiante, Giuseppe
De Fazio, Michele
Picciariello, Arcangelo
Altomare, Donato Francesco
Rinaldi, Marcella
author_facet Tomasicchio, Giovanni
Martines, Gennaro
Lantone, Giuliano
Dibra, Rigers
Trigiante, Giuseppe
De Fazio, Michele
Picciariello, Arcangelo
Altomare, Donato Francesco
Rinaldi, Marcella
author_sort Tomasicchio, Giovanni
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Single or double prolapsed pile instead of full muco-hemorrhoidal prolapse is a common finding in patients with symptomatic III or IV degree hemorrhoids. For this selected group of patients, relief of symptoms could be achieved by managing the single/double prolapsed piles instead of performing traditional hemorrhoidectomy. The aim of this single-center study was to evaluate the safety and medium- and long-term effectiveness of an outpatient tailored Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) performed under local anesthesia (LA). Material and methods: Clinical records of 202 patients submitted to outpatient tailored MMH, under LA and without anal dilation, treated between 2013 and 2020, were retrospectively reviewed using a prospectively maintained database and completed by a telephone interview or outpatient consultation. Postoperative pain score, the need for painkillers, postoperative complications and symptoms recurrence, return to working activities, and patient grading assessment scale were recorded. Results: Thirty-five (17%) out of 202 patients recruited were lost to the follow-up. One hundred and fifty-two and 15 patients underwent a single and double pile hemorrhoidectomy, respectively. With regard to postoperative outcomes, visual analogue scale (VAS) decreased from a median value of 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–6] on the day of surgery to 1 (IQR 0–4) on the 10th postoperative day (p < 0.001). Sixty-one patients (37%) needed oral painkillers during the 1st week after surgery. There was no mortality or major postoperative complication. Bleeding requiring hospital readmission was reported in seven (4%) patients, and one patient underwent emergency surgery with no need for blood transfusion. No postoperative urinary retention, anal incontinence, or stricture occurred in the series. During the median follow-up of 39 (IQR 12–60) months, 26 patients (16%) reported symptoms of recurrence but only six underwent traditional MMH. Recovery to normal activity occurred within a median period of 6 days (IQR 3–10) and the Clinical Patient Grading Assessment Scale (CPGAS) at 1 year after surgery was reported to be a “good deal better.” Conclusions: Tailored MMH performed under LA in an ambulatory setting can be considered a safe and effective technique with high compliance and satisfaction of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8415450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84154502021-09-04 Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Hemorrhoidectomy in Outpatients Setting Tomasicchio, Giovanni Martines, Gennaro Lantone, Giuliano Dibra, Rigers Trigiante, Giuseppe De Fazio, Michele Picciariello, Arcangelo Altomare, Donato Francesco Rinaldi, Marcella Front Surg Surgery Introduction: Single or double prolapsed pile instead of full muco-hemorrhoidal prolapse is a common finding in patients with symptomatic III or IV degree hemorrhoids. For this selected group of patients, relief of symptoms could be achieved by managing the single/double prolapsed piles instead of performing traditional hemorrhoidectomy. The aim of this single-center study was to evaluate the safety and medium- and long-term effectiveness of an outpatient tailored Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) performed under local anesthesia (LA). Material and methods: Clinical records of 202 patients submitted to outpatient tailored MMH, under LA and without anal dilation, treated between 2013 and 2020, were retrospectively reviewed using a prospectively maintained database and completed by a telephone interview or outpatient consultation. Postoperative pain score, the need for painkillers, postoperative complications and symptoms recurrence, return to working activities, and patient grading assessment scale were recorded. Results: Thirty-five (17%) out of 202 patients recruited were lost to the follow-up. One hundred and fifty-two and 15 patients underwent a single and double pile hemorrhoidectomy, respectively. With regard to postoperative outcomes, visual analogue scale (VAS) decreased from a median value of 4 [interquartile range (IQR) 2–6] on the day of surgery to 1 (IQR 0–4) on the 10th postoperative day (p < 0.001). Sixty-one patients (37%) needed oral painkillers during the 1st week after surgery. There was no mortality or major postoperative complication. Bleeding requiring hospital readmission was reported in seven (4%) patients, and one patient underwent emergency surgery with no need for blood transfusion. No postoperative urinary retention, anal incontinence, or stricture occurred in the series. During the median follow-up of 39 (IQR 12–60) months, 26 patients (16%) reported symptoms of recurrence but only six underwent traditional MMH. Recovery to normal activity occurred within a median period of 6 days (IQR 3–10) and the Clinical Patient Grading Assessment Scale (CPGAS) at 1 year after surgery was reported to be a “good deal better.” Conclusions: Tailored MMH performed under LA in an ambulatory setting can be considered a safe and effective technique with high compliance and satisfaction of patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8415450/ /pubmed/34485375 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.708051 Text en Copyright © 2021 Tomasicchio, Martines, Lantone, Dibra, Trigiante, De Fazio, Picciariello, Altomare and Rinaldi. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Tomasicchio, Giovanni
Martines, Gennaro
Lantone, Giuliano
Dibra, Rigers
Trigiante, Giuseppe
De Fazio, Michele
Picciariello, Arcangelo
Altomare, Donato Francesco
Rinaldi, Marcella
Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Hemorrhoidectomy in Outpatients Setting
title Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Hemorrhoidectomy in Outpatients Setting
title_full Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Hemorrhoidectomy in Outpatients Setting
title_fullStr Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Hemorrhoidectomy in Outpatients Setting
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Hemorrhoidectomy in Outpatients Setting
title_short Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Hemorrhoidectomy in Outpatients Setting
title_sort safety and effectiveness of tailored hemorrhoidectomy in outpatients setting
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34485375
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.708051
work_keys_str_mv AT tomasicchiogiovanni safetyandeffectivenessoftailoredhemorrhoidectomyinoutpatientssetting
AT martinesgennaro safetyandeffectivenessoftailoredhemorrhoidectomyinoutpatientssetting
AT lantonegiuliano safetyandeffectivenessoftailoredhemorrhoidectomyinoutpatientssetting
AT dibrarigers safetyandeffectivenessoftailoredhemorrhoidectomyinoutpatientssetting
AT trigiantegiuseppe safetyandeffectivenessoftailoredhemorrhoidectomyinoutpatientssetting
AT defaziomichele safetyandeffectivenessoftailoredhemorrhoidectomyinoutpatientssetting
AT picciarielloarcangelo safetyandeffectivenessoftailoredhemorrhoidectomyinoutpatientssetting
AT altomaredonatofrancesco safetyandeffectivenessoftailoredhemorrhoidectomyinoutpatientssetting
AT rinaldimarcella safetyandeffectivenessoftailoredhemorrhoidectomyinoutpatientssetting