Cargando…

Environmental and Occupational Considerations of Anesthesia: A Narrative Review and Update

With an estimated worldwide volume of 266 million surgeries in 2015, the call for general inhalation anesthesia is considerable. However, widely used volatile anesthetics such as N(2)O and the highly fluorinated gases sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane are greenhouse gases, ozone-depleting agen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varughese, Shane, Ahmed, Raza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkin 2021
Materias:
48
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33857027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005504
_version_ 1783748027040661504
author Varughese, Shane
Ahmed, Raza
author_facet Varughese, Shane
Ahmed, Raza
author_sort Varughese, Shane
collection PubMed
description With an estimated worldwide volume of 266 million surgeries in 2015, the call for general inhalation anesthesia is considerable. However, widely used volatile anesthetics such as N(2)O and the highly fluorinated gases sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane are greenhouse gases, ozone-depleting agents, or both. Because these agents undergo minimal metabolism in the body during clinical use and are primarily (≥95%) eliminated unchanged via exhalation, waste anesthetic gases (WAGs) in operating rooms and postanesthesia care units can pose a challenge for overall elimination and occupational exposure. The chemical properties and global warming impacts of these gases vary, with atmospheric lifetimes of 1−5 years for sevoflurane, 3−6 years for isoflurane, 9−21 years for desflurane, and 114 years for N(2)O. Additionally, the use of N(2)O as a carrier gas for the inhalation anesthetics and as a supplement to intravenous (IV) anesthetics further contributes to these impacts. At the same time, unscavenged WAGs can result in chronic occupational exposure of health care workers to potential associated adverse health effects. Few adverse effects associated with WAGs have been documented, however, when workplace exposure limits are implemented. Specific measures that can help reduce occupational exposure and the environmental impact of inhaled anesthetics include efficient ventilation and scavenging systems, regular monitoring of airborne concentrations of waste gases to remain below recommended limits, ensuring that anesthesia equipment is well maintained, avoiding desflurane and N(2)O if possible, and minimizing fresh gas flow rates (eg, use of low-flow anesthesia). One alternative to volatile anesthetics may be total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). While TIVA is not associated with the risks of occupational exposure or atmospheric pollution that are inherent to volatile anesthetic gases, clinical considerations should be weighed in the choice of agent. Appropriate procedures for the disposal of IV anesthetics must be followed to minimize any potential for negative environmental effects. Overall, although their contributions are relatively low compared with those of other human-produced substances, inhaled anesthetics are intrinsically potent greenhouse gases and pose a risk to operating-room personnel if not properly managed and scavenged. Factors to reduce waste and minimize the future impact of these substances should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8415729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84157292021-09-13 Environmental and Occupational Considerations of Anesthesia: A Narrative Review and Update Varughese, Shane Ahmed, Raza Anesth Analg 48 With an estimated worldwide volume of 266 million surgeries in 2015, the call for general inhalation anesthesia is considerable. However, widely used volatile anesthetics such as N(2)O and the highly fluorinated gases sevoflurane, desflurane, and isoflurane are greenhouse gases, ozone-depleting agents, or both. Because these agents undergo minimal metabolism in the body during clinical use and are primarily (≥95%) eliminated unchanged via exhalation, waste anesthetic gases (WAGs) in operating rooms and postanesthesia care units can pose a challenge for overall elimination and occupational exposure. The chemical properties and global warming impacts of these gases vary, with atmospheric lifetimes of 1−5 years for sevoflurane, 3−6 years for isoflurane, 9−21 years for desflurane, and 114 years for N(2)O. Additionally, the use of N(2)O as a carrier gas for the inhalation anesthetics and as a supplement to intravenous (IV) anesthetics further contributes to these impacts. At the same time, unscavenged WAGs can result in chronic occupational exposure of health care workers to potential associated adverse health effects. Few adverse effects associated with WAGs have been documented, however, when workplace exposure limits are implemented. Specific measures that can help reduce occupational exposure and the environmental impact of inhaled anesthetics include efficient ventilation and scavenging systems, regular monitoring of airborne concentrations of waste gases to remain below recommended limits, ensuring that anesthesia equipment is well maintained, avoiding desflurane and N(2)O if possible, and minimizing fresh gas flow rates (eg, use of low-flow anesthesia). One alternative to volatile anesthetics may be total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). While TIVA is not associated with the risks of occupational exposure or atmospheric pollution that are inherent to volatile anesthetic gases, clinical considerations should be weighed in the choice of agent. Appropriate procedures for the disposal of IV anesthetics must be followed to minimize any potential for negative environmental effects. Overall, although their contributions are relatively low compared with those of other human-produced substances, inhaled anesthetics are intrinsically potent greenhouse gases and pose a risk to operating-room personnel if not properly managed and scavenged. Factors to reduce waste and minimize the future impact of these substances should be considered. Lippincott Williams & Wilkin 2021-04-15 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8415729/ /pubmed/33857027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005504 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc on behalf of the International Anesthesia Research Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 48
Varughese, Shane
Ahmed, Raza
Environmental and Occupational Considerations of Anesthesia: A Narrative Review and Update
title Environmental and Occupational Considerations of Anesthesia: A Narrative Review and Update
title_full Environmental and Occupational Considerations of Anesthesia: A Narrative Review and Update
title_fullStr Environmental and Occupational Considerations of Anesthesia: A Narrative Review and Update
title_full_unstemmed Environmental and Occupational Considerations of Anesthesia: A Narrative Review and Update
title_short Environmental and Occupational Considerations of Anesthesia: A Narrative Review and Update
title_sort environmental and occupational considerations of anesthesia: a narrative review and update
topic 48
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33857027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005504
work_keys_str_mv AT varugheseshane environmentalandoccupationalconsiderationsofanesthesiaanarrativereviewandupdate
AT ahmedraza environmentalandoccupationalconsiderationsofanesthesiaanarrativereviewandupdate