Cargando…

Clinical characteristics of cirrhosis patients with umbilical vein recanalization: A retrospective analysis

Umbilical Vein Recanalization (UVR) may occur in patients with long-standing portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of UVR. Medical records of a cohort of patients with cirrhosis (n = 247) who were hospitalized at the Digestive Medicine Cen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Qing, Xiong, Kai, Ding, Bin, Ye, XiaoLing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34477116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026774
_version_ 1783748083881869312
author Shi, Qing
Xiong, Kai
Ding, Bin
Ye, XiaoLing
author_facet Shi, Qing
Xiong, Kai
Ding, Bin
Ye, XiaoLing
author_sort Shi, Qing
collection PubMed
description Umbilical Vein Recanalization (UVR) may occur in patients with long-standing portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of UVR. Medical records of a cohort of patients with cirrhosis (n = 247) who were hospitalized at the Digestive Medicine Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2012 to October 2015 were accessed. The UVR diagnosis was made by ultrasound examination and was confirmed by computerized tomography scan. The UVR incidence was 20.2% (50/247) in the cohort. The size of UVR was 9.9 ± 4.7 mm (range: 5–26.5 mm) in diameter. The UVR and non-UVR groups showed no difference in grades of hepatic encephalopathy (P = .496), Child-Pugh classification (P = .401), the incidence of moderately severe ascites (26% vs 26%, P = 1), the esophageal variceal bleeding rate (32% vs 39%, P = .402), or portal vein thrombosis (8% vs 12%, P = .580). However, the incidence of cavernous transformation of the portal vein was statistically different, that there was 0 case in the UVR group and 8 cases in the non-UVR group (P < .05). Our results suggested that UVR had little impact on the clinical manifestations of patients with liver cirrhosis, the significance of UVR as an intervention method requires further studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8415999
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84159992021-09-07 Clinical characteristics of cirrhosis patients with umbilical vein recanalization: A retrospective analysis Shi, Qing Xiong, Kai Ding, Bin Ye, XiaoLing Medicine (Baltimore) 4500 Umbilical Vein Recanalization (UVR) may occur in patients with long-standing portal hypertension and liver cirrhosis. This study aimed to investigate the clinical significance of UVR. Medical records of a cohort of patients with cirrhosis (n = 247) who were hospitalized at the Digestive Medicine Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University from January 2012 to October 2015 were accessed. The UVR diagnosis was made by ultrasound examination and was confirmed by computerized tomography scan. The UVR incidence was 20.2% (50/247) in the cohort. The size of UVR was 9.9 ± 4.7 mm (range: 5–26.5 mm) in diameter. The UVR and non-UVR groups showed no difference in grades of hepatic encephalopathy (P = .496), Child-Pugh classification (P = .401), the incidence of moderately severe ascites (26% vs 26%, P = 1), the esophageal variceal bleeding rate (32% vs 39%, P = .402), or portal vein thrombosis (8% vs 12%, P = .580). However, the incidence of cavernous transformation of the portal vein was statistically different, that there was 0 case in the UVR group and 8 cases in the non-UVR group (P < .05). Our results suggested that UVR had little impact on the clinical manifestations of patients with liver cirrhosis, the significance of UVR as an intervention method requires further studies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2021-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8415999/ /pubmed/34477116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026774 Text en Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle 4500
Shi, Qing
Xiong, Kai
Ding, Bin
Ye, XiaoLing
Clinical characteristics of cirrhosis patients with umbilical vein recanalization: A retrospective analysis
title Clinical characteristics of cirrhosis patients with umbilical vein recanalization: A retrospective analysis
title_full Clinical characteristics of cirrhosis patients with umbilical vein recanalization: A retrospective analysis
title_fullStr Clinical characteristics of cirrhosis patients with umbilical vein recanalization: A retrospective analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical characteristics of cirrhosis patients with umbilical vein recanalization: A retrospective analysis
title_short Clinical characteristics of cirrhosis patients with umbilical vein recanalization: A retrospective analysis
title_sort clinical characteristics of cirrhosis patients with umbilical vein recanalization: a retrospective analysis
topic 4500
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415999/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34477116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026774
work_keys_str_mv AT shiqing clinicalcharacteristicsofcirrhosispatientswithumbilicalveinrecanalizationaretrospectiveanalysis
AT xiongkai clinicalcharacteristicsofcirrhosispatientswithumbilicalveinrecanalizationaretrospectiveanalysis
AT dingbin clinicalcharacteristicsofcirrhosispatientswithumbilicalveinrecanalizationaretrospectiveanalysis
AT yexiaoling clinicalcharacteristicsofcirrhosispatientswithumbilicalveinrecanalizationaretrospectiveanalysis