Cargando…
Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems
Objectives : To highlight the role of technology assessment in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method : An overview of existing research and evaluation approaches along with expert perspectives drawn from the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Working Group on Technology A...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8416188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726490 |
_version_ | 1783748128205176832 |
---|---|
author | Magrabi, Farah Ammenwerth, Elske Craven, Catherine K. Cresswell, Kathrin De Keizer, Nicolet F. Medlock, Stephanie K. Scott, Philip J. Wong, Zoie Shui-Yee Georgiou, Andrew |
author_facet | Magrabi, Farah Ammenwerth, Elske Craven, Catherine K. Cresswell, Kathrin De Keizer, Nicolet F. Medlock, Stephanie K. Scott, Philip J. Wong, Zoie Shui-Yee Georgiou, Andrew |
author_sort | Magrabi, Farah |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives : To highlight the role of technology assessment in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method : An overview of existing research and evaluation approaches along with expert perspectives drawn from the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Working Group on Technology Assessment and Quality Development in Health Informatics and the European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems. Results : Evaluation of digital health technologies for COVID-19 should be based on their technical maturity as well as the scale of implementation. For mature technologies like telehealth whose efficacy has been previously demonstrated, pragmatic, rapid evaluation using the complex systems paradigm which accounts for multiple sociotechnical factors, might be more suitable to examine their effectiveness and emerging safety concerns in new settings. New technologies, particularly those intended for use on a large scale such as digital contract tracing, will require assessment of their usability as well as performance prior to deployment, after which evaluation should shift to using a complex systems paradigm to examine the value of information provided. The success of a digital health technology is dependent on the value of information it provides relative to the sociotechnical context of the setting where it is implemented. Conclusion : Commitment to evaluation using the evidence-based medicine and complex systems paradigms will be critical to ensuring safe and effective use of digital health technologies for COVID-19 and future pandemics. There is an inherent tension between evaluation and the imperative to urgently deploy solutions that needs to be negotiated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8416188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84161882021-09-07 Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems Magrabi, Farah Ammenwerth, Elske Craven, Catherine K. Cresswell, Kathrin De Keizer, Nicolet F. Medlock, Stephanie K. Scott, Philip J. Wong, Zoie Shui-Yee Georgiou, Andrew Yearb Med Inform Objectives : To highlight the role of technology assessment in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method : An overview of existing research and evaluation approaches along with expert perspectives drawn from the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Working Group on Technology Assessment and Quality Development in Health Informatics and the European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems. Results : Evaluation of digital health technologies for COVID-19 should be based on their technical maturity as well as the scale of implementation. For mature technologies like telehealth whose efficacy has been previously demonstrated, pragmatic, rapid evaluation using the complex systems paradigm which accounts for multiple sociotechnical factors, might be more suitable to examine their effectiveness and emerging safety concerns in new settings. New technologies, particularly those intended for use on a large scale such as digital contract tracing, will require assessment of their usability as well as performance prior to deployment, after which evaluation should shift to using a complex systems paradigm to examine the value of information provided. The success of a digital health technology is dependent on the value of information it provides relative to the sociotechnical context of the setting where it is implemented. Conclusion : Commitment to evaluation using the evidence-based medicine and complex systems paradigms will be critical to ensuring safe and effective use of digital health technologies for COVID-19 and future pandemics. There is an inherent tension between evaluation and the imperative to urgently deploy solutions that needs to be negotiated. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-08 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8416188/ /pubmed/33882604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726490 Text en IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Magrabi, Farah Ammenwerth, Elske Craven, Catherine K. Cresswell, Kathrin De Keizer, Nicolet F. Medlock, Stephanie K. Scott, Philip J. Wong, Zoie Shui-Yee Georgiou, Andrew Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems |
title | Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems |
title_full | Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems |
title_fullStr | Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems |
title_short | Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems |
title_sort | managing pandemic responses with health informatics – challenges for assessing digital health technologies: a joint position paper from the imia technology assessment & quality development in health informatics working group and efmi working group for assessment of health information systems |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8416188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT magrabifarah managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems AT ammenwerthelske managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems AT cravencatherinek managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems AT cresswellkathrin managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems AT dekeizernicoletf managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems AT medlockstephaniek managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems AT scottphilipj managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems AT wongzoieshuiyee managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems AT georgiouandrew managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems |