Cargando…

Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems

Objectives : To highlight the role of technology assessment in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method : An overview of existing research and evaluation approaches along with expert perspectives drawn from the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Working Group on Technology A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Magrabi, Farah, Ammenwerth, Elske, Craven, Catherine K., Cresswell, Kathrin, De Keizer, Nicolet F., Medlock, Stephanie K., Scott, Philip J., Wong, Zoie Shui-Yee, Georgiou, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8416188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726490
_version_ 1783748128205176832
author Magrabi, Farah
Ammenwerth, Elske
Craven, Catherine K.
Cresswell, Kathrin
De Keizer, Nicolet F.
Medlock, Stephanie K.
Scott, Philip J.
Wong, Zoie Shui-Yee
Georgiou, Andrew
author_facet Magrabi, Farah
Ammenwerth, Elske
Craven, Catherine K.
Cresswell, Kathrin
De Keizer, Nicolet F.
Medlock, Stephanie K.
Scott, Philip J.
Wong, Zoie Shui-Yee
Georgiou, Andrew
author_sort Magrabi, Farah
collection PubMed
description Objectives : To highlight the role of technology assessment in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method : An overview of existing research and evaluation approaches along with expert perspectives drawn from the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Working Group on Technology Assessment and Quality Development in Health Informatics and the European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems. Results : Evaluation of digital health technologies for COVID-19 should be based on their technical maturity as well as the scale of implementation. For mature technologies like telehealth whose efficacy has been previously demonstrated, pragmatic, rapid evaluation using the complex systems paradigm which accounts for multiple sociotechnical factors, might be more suitable to examine their effectiveness and emerging safety concerns in new settings. New technologies, particularly those intended for use on a large scale such as digital contract tracing, will require assessment of their usability as well as performance prior to deployment, after which evaluation should shift to using a complex systems paradigm to examine the value of information provided. The success of a digital health technology is dependent on the value of information it provides relative to the sociotechnical context of the setting where it is implemented. Conclusion : Commitment to evaluation using the evidence-based medicine and complex systems paradigms will be critical to ensuring safe and effective use of digital health technologies for COVID-19 and future pandemics. There is an inherent tension between evaluation and the imperative to urgently deploy solutions that needs to be negotiated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8416188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84161882021-09-07 Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems Magrabi, Farah Ammenwerth, Elske Craven, Catherine K. Cresswell, Kathrin De Keizer, Nicolet F. Medlock, Stephanie K. Scott, Philip J. Wong, Zoie Shui-Yee Georgiou, Andrew Yearb Med Inform Objectives : To highlight the role of technology assessment in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Method : An overview of existing research and evaluation approaches along with expert perspectives drawn from the International Medical Informatics Association (IMIA) Working Group on Technology Assessment and Quality Development in Health Informatics and the European Federation for Medical Informatics (EFMI) Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems. Results : Evaluation of digital health technologies for COVID-19 should be based on their technical maturity as well as the scale of implementation. For mature technologies like telehealth whose efficacy has been previously demonstrated, pragmatic, rapid evaluation using the complex systems paradigm which accounts for multiple sociotechnical factors, might be more suitable to examine their effectiveness and emerging safety concerns in new settings. New technologies, particularly those intended for use on a large scale such as digital contract tracing, will require assessment of their usability as well as performance prior to deployment, after which evaluation should shift to using a complex systems paradigm to examine the value of information provided. The success of a digital health technology is dependent on the value of information it provides relative to the sociotechnical context of the setting where it is implemented. Conclusion : Commitment to evaluation using the evidence-based medicine and complex systems paradigms will be critical to ensuring safe and effective use of digital health technologies for COVID-19 and future pandemics. There is an inherent tension between evaluation and the imperative to urgently deploy solutions that needs to be negotiated. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-08 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8416188/ /pubmed/33882604 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726490 Text en IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Magrabi, Farah
Ammenwerth, Elske
Craven, Catherine K.
Cresswell, Kathrin
De Keizer, Nicolet F.
Medlock, Stephanie K.
Scott, Philip J.
Wong, Zoie Shui-Yee
Georgiou, Andrew
Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems
title Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems
title_full Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems
title_fullStr Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems
title_full_unstemmed Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems
title_short Managing Pandemic Responses with Health Informatics – Challenges for Assessing Digital Health Technologies: A Joint Position Paper from the IMIA Technology Assessment & Quality Development in Health Informatics Working Group and EFMI Working Group for Assessment of Health Information Systems
title_sort managing pandemic responses with health informatics – challenges for assessing digital health technologies: a joint position paper from the imia technology assessment & quality development in health informatics working group and efmi working group for assessment of health information systems
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8416188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882604
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726490
work_keys_str_mv AT magrabifarah managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems
AT ammenwerthelske managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems
AT cravencatherinek managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems
AT cresswellkathrin managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems
AT dekeizernicoletf managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems
AT medlockstephaniek managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems
AT scottphilipj managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems
AT wongzoieshuiyee managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems
AT georgiouandrew managingpandemicresponseswithhealthinformaticschallengesforassessingdigitalhealthtechnologiesajointpositionpaperfromtheimiatechnologyassessmentqualitydevelopmentinhealthinformaticsworkinggroupandefmiworkinggroupforassessmentofhealthinformationsystems