Cargando…

New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation

Objectives: To review the current state of research on designing and implementing clinical decision support (CDS) using four current interoperability standards: Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR); Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies (SMART); Clinical Quality L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taber, Peter, Radloff, Christina, Del Fiol, Guilherme, Staes, Catherine, Kawamoto, Kensaku
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8416232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34479387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726502
_version_ 1783748136403992576
author Taber, Peter
Radloff, Christina
Del Fiol, Guilherme
Staes, Catherine
Kawamoto, Kensaku
author_facet Taber, Peter
Radloff, Christina
Del Fiol, Guilherme
Staes, Catherine
Kawamoto, Kensaku
author_sort Taber, Peter
collection PubMed
description Objectives: To review the current state of research on designing and implementing clinical decision support (CDS) using four current interoperability standards: Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR); Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies (SMART); Clinical Quality Language (CQL); and CDS Hooks. Methods: We conducted a review of original studies describing development of specific CDS tools or infrastructures using one of the four targeted standards, regardless of implementation stage. Citations published any time before the literature search was executed on October 21, 2020 were retrieved from PubMed. Two reviewers independently screened articles and abstracted data according to a protocol designed by team consensus. Results: Of 290 articles identified via PubMed search, 44 were included in this study. More than three quarters were published since 2018. Forty-three (98%) used FHIR; 22 (50%) used SMART; two (5%) used CQL; and eight (18%) used CDS Hooks. Twenty-four (55%) were in the design stage, 15 (34%) in the piloting stage, and five (11%) were deployed in a real-world setting. Only 12 (27%) of the articles reported an evaluation of the technology under development. Three of the four articles describing a deployed technology reported an evaluation. Only two evaluations with randomized study components were identified. Conclusion: The diversity of topics and approaches identified in the literature highlights the utility of these standards. The infrequency of reported evaluations, as well as the high number of studies in the design or piloting stage, indicate that these technologies are still early in their life cycles. Informaticists will require a stronger evidence base to understand the implications of using these standards in CDS design and implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8416232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84162322021-09-07 New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation Taber, Peter Radloff, Christina Del Fiol, Guilherme Staes, Catherine Kawamoto, Kensaku Yearb Med Inform Objectives: To review the current state of research on designing and implementing clinical decision support (CDS) using four current interoperability standards: Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR); Substitutable Medical Applications and Reusable Technologies (SMART); Clinical Quality Language (CQL); and CDS Hooks. Methods: We conducted a review of original studies describing development of specific CDS tools or infrastructures using one of the four targeted standards, regardless of implementation stage. Citations published any time before the literature search was executed on October 21, 2020 were retrieved from PubMed. Two reviewers independently screened articles and abstracted data according to a protocol designed by team consensus. Results: Of 290 articles identified via PubMed search, 44 were included in this study. More than three quarters were published since 2018. Forty-three (98%) used FHIR; 22 (50%) used SMART; two (5%) used CQL; and eight (18%) used CDS Hooks. Twenty-four (55%) were in the design stage, 15 (34%) in the piloting stage, and five (11%) were deployed in a real-world setting. Only 12 (27%) of the articles reported an evaluation of the technology under development. Three of the four articles describing a deployed technology reported an evaluation. Only two evaluations with randomized study components were identified. Conclusion: The diversity of topics and approaches identified in the literature highlights the utility of these standards. The infrequency of reported evaluations, as well as the high number of studies in the design or piloting stage, indicate that these technologies are still early in their life cycles. Informaticists will require a stronger evidence base to understand the implications of using these standards in CDS design and implementation. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-08 2021-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8416232/ /pubmed/34479387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726502 Text en IMIA and Thieme. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Taber, Peter
Radloff, Christina
Del Fiol, Guilherme
Staes, Catherine
Kawamoto, Kensaku
New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation
title New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation
title_full New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation
title_fullStr New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation
title_full_unstemmed New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation
title_short New Standards for Clinical Decision Support: A Survey of The State of Implementation
title_sort new standards for clinical decision support: a survey of the state of implementation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8416232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34479387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726502
work_keys_str_mv AT taberpeter newstandardsforclinicaldecisionsupportasurveyofthestateofimplementation
AT radloffchristina newstandardsforclinicaldecisionsupportasurveyofthestateofimplementation
AT delfiolguilherme newstandardsforclinicaldecisionsupportasurveyofthestateofimplementation
AT staescatherine newstandardsforclinicaldecisionsupportasurveyofthestateofimplementation
AT kawamotokensaku newstandardsforclinicaldecisionsupportasurveyofthestateofimplementation