Cargando…

A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface

In an electroencephalogram- (EEG-) based brain–computer interface (BCI), a subject can directly communicate with an electronic device using his EEG signals in a safe and convenient way. However, the sensitivity to noise/artifact and the non-stationarity of EEG signals result in high inter-subject/se...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Xin, Xu, Yilu, Hua, Jing, Yi, Wenlong, Yin, Hua, Hu, Ronghua, Wang, Shiyi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489636
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.733546
_version_ 1783748312380211200
author Huang, Xin
Xu, Yilu
Hua, Jing
Yi, Wenlong
Yin, Hua
Hu, Ronghua
Wang, Shiyi
author_facet Huang, Xin
Xu, Yilu
Hua, Jing
Yi, Wenlong
Yin, Hua
Hu, Ronghua
Wang, Shiyi
author_sort Huang, Xin
collection PubMed
description In an electroencephalogram- (EEG-) based brain–computer interface (BCI), a subject can directly communicate with an electronic device using his EEG signals in a safe and convenient way. However, the sensitivity to noise/artifact and the non-stationarity of EEG signals result in high inter-subject/session variability. Therefore, each subject usually spends long and tedious calibration time in building a subject-specific classifier. To solve this problem, we review existing signal processing approaches, including transfer learning (TL), semi-supervised learning (SSL), and a combination of TL and SSL. Cross-subject TL can transfer amounts of labeled samples from different source subjects for the target subject. Moreover, Cross-session/task/device TL can reduce the calibration time of the subject for the target session, task, or device by importing the labeled samples from the source sessions, tasks, or devices. SSL simultaneously utilizes the labeled and unlabeled samples from the target subject. The combination of TL and SSL can take advantage of each other. For each kind of signal processing approaches, we introduce their concepts and representative methods. The experimental results show that TL, SSL, and their combination can obtain good classification performance by effectively utilizing the samples available. In the end, we draw a conclusion and point to research directions in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8417074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84170742021-09-05 A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface Huang, Xin Xu, Yilu Hua, Jing Yi, Wenlong Yin, Hua Hu, Ronghua Wang, Shiyi Front Neurosci Neuroscience In an electroencephalogram- (EEG-) based brain–computer interface (BCI), a subject can directly communicate with an electronic device using his EEG signals in a safe and convenient way. However, the sensitivity to noise/artifact and the non-stationarity of EEG signals result in high inter-subject/session variability. Therefore, each subject usually spends long and tedious calibration time in building a subject-specific classifier. To solve this problem, we review existing signal processing approaches, including transfer learning (TL), semi-supervised learning (SSL), and a combination of TL and SSL. Cross-subject TL can transfer amounts of labeled samples from different source subjects for the target subject. Moreover, Cross-session/task/device TL can reduce the calibration time of the subject for the target session, task, or device by importing the labeled samples from the source sessions, tasks, or devices. SSL simultaneously utilizes the labeled and unlabeled samples from the target subject. The combination of TL and SSL can take advantage of each other. For each kind of signal processing approaches, we introduce their concepts and representative methods. The experimental results show that TL, SSL, and their combination can obtain good classification performance by effectively utilizing the samples available. In the end, we draw a conclusion and point to research directions in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8417074/ /pubmed/34489636 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.733546 Text en Copyright © 2021 Huang, Xu, Hua, Yi, Yin, Hu and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Huang, Xin
Xu, Yilu
Hua, Jing
Yi, Wenlong
Yin, Hua
Hu, Ronghua
Wang, Shiyi
A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface
title A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface
title_full A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface
title_fullStr A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface
title_full_unstemmed A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface
title_short A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface
title_sort review on signal processing approaches to reduce calibration time in eeg-based brain–computer interface
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489636
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.733546
work_keys_str_mv AT huangxin areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT xuyilu areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT huajing areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT yiwenlong areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT yinhua areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT huronghua areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT wangshiyi areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT huangxin reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT xuyilu reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT huajing reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT yiwenlong reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT yinhua reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT huronghua reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface
AT wangshiyi reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface