Cargando…
A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface
In an electroencephalogram- (EEG-) based brain–computer interface (BCI), a subject can directly communicate with an electronic device using his EEG signals in a safe and convenient way. However, the sensitivity to noise/artifact and the non-stationarity of EEG signals result in high inter-subject/se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489636 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.733546 |
_version_ | 1783748312380211200 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Xin Xu, Yilu Hua, Jing Yi, Wenlong Yin, Hua Hu, Ronghua Wang, Shiyi |
author_facet | Huang, Xin Xu, Yilu Hua, Jing Yi, Wenlong Yin, Hua Hu, Ronghua Wang, Shiyi |
author_sort | Huang, Xin |
collection | PubMed |
description | In an electroencephalogram- (EEG-) based brain–computer interface (BCI), a subject can directly communicate with an electronic device using his EEG signals in a safe and convenient way. However, the sensitivity to noise/artifact and the non-stationarity of EEG signals result in high inter-subject/session variability. Therefore, each subject usually spends long and tedious calibration time in building a subject-specific classifier. To solve this problem, we review existing signal processing approaches, including transfer learning (TL), semi-supervised learning (SSL), and a combination of TL and SSL. Cross-subject TL can transfer amounts of labeled samples from different source subjects for the target subject. Moreover, Cross-session/task/device TL can reduce the calibration time of the subject for the target session, task, or device by importing the labeled samples from the source sessions, tasks, or devices. SSL simultaneously utilizes the labeled and unlabeled samples from the target subject. The combination of TL and SSL can take advantage of each other. For each kind of signal processing approaches, we introduce their concepts and representative methods. The experimental results show that TL, SSL, and their combination can obtain good classification performance by effectively utilizing the samples available. In the end, we draw a conclusion and point to research directions in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8417074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84170742021-09-05 A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface Huang, Xin Xu, Yilu Hua, Jing Yi, Wenlong Yin, Hua Hu, Ronghua Wang, Shiyi Front Neurosci Neuroscience In an electroencephalogram- (EEG-) based brain–computer interface (BCI), a subject can directly communicate with an electronic device using his EEG signals in a safe and convenient way. However, the sensitivity to noise/artifact and the non-stationarity of EEG signals result in high inter-subject/session variability. Therefore, each subject usually spends long and tedious calibration time in building a subject-specific classifier. To solve this problem, we review existing signal processing approaches, including transfer learning (TL), semi-supervised learning (SSL), and a combination of TL and SSL. Cross-subject TL can transfer amounts of labeled samples from different source subjects for the target subject. Moreover, Cross-session/task/device TL can reduce the calibration time of the subject for the target session, task, or device by importing the labeled samples from the source sessions, tasks, or devices. SSL simultaneously utilizes the labeled and unlabeled samples from the target subject. The combination of TL and SSL can take advantage of each other. For each kind of signal processing approaches, we introduce their concepts and representative methods. The experimental results show that TL, SSL, and their combination can obtain good classification performance by effectively utilizing the samples available. In the end, we draw a conclusion and point to research directions in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8417074/ /pubmed/34489636 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.733546 Text en Copyright © 2021 Huang, Xu, Hua, Yi, Yin, Hu and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Huang, Xin Xu, Yilu Hua, Jing Yi, Wenlong Yin, Hua Hu, Ronghua Wang, Shiyi A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface |
title | A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface |
title_full | A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface |
title_fullStr | A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface |
title_short | A Review on Signal Processing Approaches to Reduce Calibration Time in EEG-Based Brain–Computer Interface |
title_sort | review on signal processing approaches to reduce calibration time in eeg-based brain–computer interface |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489636 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.733546 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangxin areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT xuyilu areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT huajing areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT yiwenlong areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT yinhua areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT huronghua areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT wangshiyi areviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT huangxin reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT xuyilu reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT huajing reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT yiwenlong reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT yinhua reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT huronghua reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface AT wangshiyi reviewonsignalprocessingapproachestoreducecalibrationtimeineegbasedbraincomputerinterface |