Cargando…

Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma Compared With FIGO Staging System: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND: Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare tumor that lacks a prognostic prediction model. Our study aims to develop a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) of PPSC patients. METHODS: Patients confirmed to have PPSC between 2004 and 2012 were selected from the Surveillance,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Ming, Wen, Zhenzhen, Qi, Zhengwei, Gao, Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.651969
_version_ 1783748335504457728
author Chen, Ming
Wen, Zhenzhen
Qi, Zhengwei
Gao, Min
author_facet Chen, Ming
Wen, Zhenzhen
Qi, Zhengwei
Gao, Min
author_sort Chen, Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare tumor that lacks a prognostic prediction model. Our study aims to develop a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) of PPSC patients. METHODS: Patients confirmed to have PPSC between 2004 and 2012 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to screen for meaningful independent prognostic factors to construct a nomogram model for 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS among patients with PPSC. The nomogram compared the discrimination, calibration, and net benefits with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system of PPSC patients. RESULTS: Eight variables were selected to establish the nomogram for PPSC. The established nomogram performed significantly better than the FIGO staging system (p < 0.05). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS of PPSC was 0.498, 0.306, and 0.152, respectively. Patients of old age, widowed marital status, grade high, FIGO IIIB, IIIC, or IV, lymph node metastasis, no lymphadenectomy, no surgery, and no chemotherapy got higher score which corresponds with higher risk and lower OS. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, histological grade, FIGO staging, lymph node metastasis, and lymphadenectomy (four or more) were identified as independent prognostic factors for PPSC. CONCLUSIONS: PPSC patients have distinct characteristics with respect to their presentation and survival outcomes. A prognostic nomogram constructed by various clinical indicators can provide better and more accurate predictions for patients with PPSC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8417239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84172392021-09-05 Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma Compared With FIGO Staging System: A Population-Based Study Chen, Ming Wen, Zhenzhen Qi, Zhengwei Gao, Min Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare tumor that lacks a prognostic prediction model. Our study aims to develop a nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) of PPSC patients. METHODS: Patients confirmed to have PPSC between 2004 and 2012 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to screen for meaningful independent prognostic factors to construct a nomogram model for 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS among patients with PPSC. The nomogram compared the discrimination, calibration, and net benefits with the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system of PPSC patients. RESULTS: Eight variables were selected to establish the nomogram for PPSC. The established nomogram performed significantly better than the FIGO staging system (p < 0.05). The 3-, 5-, and 10-year OS of PPSC was 0.498, 0.306, and 0.152, respectively. Patients of old age, widowed marital status, grade high, FIGO IIIB, IIIC, or IV, lymph node metastasis, no lymphadenectomy, no surgery, and no chemotherapy got higher score which corresponds with higher risk and lower OS. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, age, histological grade, FIGO staging, lymph node metastasis, and lymphadenectomy (four or more) were identified as independent prognostic factors for PPSC. CONCLUSIONS: PPSC patients have distinct characteristics with respect to their presentation and survival outcomes. A prognostic nomogram constructed by various clinical indicators can provide better and more accurate predictions for patients with PPSC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8417239/ /pubmed/34490079 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.651969 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chen, Wen, Qi and Gao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Chen, Ming
Wen, Zhenzhen
Qi, Zhengwei
Gao, Min
Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma Compared With FIGO Staging System: A Population-Based Study
title Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma Compared With FIGO Staging System: A Population-Based Study
title_full Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma Compared With FIGO Staging System: A Population-Based Study
title_fullStr Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma Compared With FIGO Staging System: A Population-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma Compared With FIGO Staging System: A Population-Based Study
title_short Development and Validation of Prognostic Nomogram for Primary Peritoneal Serous Carcinoma Compared With FIGO Staging System: A Population-Based Study
title_sort development and validation of prognostic nomogram for primary peritoneal serous carcinoma compared with figo staging system: a population-based study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490079
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.651969
work_keys_str_mv AT chenming developmentandvalidationofprognosticnomogramforprimaryperitonealserouscarcinomacomparedwithfigostagingsystemapopulationbasedstudy
AT wenzhenzhen developmentandvalidationofprognosticnomogramforprimaryperitonealserouscarcinomacomparedwithfigostagingsystemapopulationbasedstudy
AT qizhengwei developmentandvalidationofprognosticnomogramforprimaryperitonealserouscarcinomacomparedwithfigostagingsystemapopulationbasedstudy
AT gaomin developmentandvalidationofprognosticnomogramforprimaryperitonealserouscarcinomacomparedwithfigostagingsystemapopulationbasedstudy