Cargando…

Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission()

BACKGROUND: Human-to-animal transmission of M. tuberculosis (Mtb) is reported in South Africa but there is a paucity of epidemiological data. The aim of this One Health manuscript is to describe zooanthroponotic exposure of domestic animals to TB patients, virtually all of whom had laboratory confir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moyo, Maureen, Lebina, Limakatso, Milovanovic, Minja, MacPherson, Peter, Michel, Anita, Martinson, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100319
_version_ 1783748370212323328
author Moyo, Maureen
Lebina, Limakatso
Milovanovic, Minja
MacPherson, Peter
Michel, Anita
Martinson, Neil
author_facet Moyo, Maureen
Lebina, Limakatso
Milovanovic, Minja
MacPherson, Peter
Michel, Anita
Martinson, Neil
author_sort Moyo, Maureen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human-to-animal transmission of M. tuberculosis (Mtb) is reported in South Africa but there is a paucity of epidemiological data. The aim of this One Health manuscript is to describe zooanthroponotic exposure of domestic animals to TB patients, virtually all of whom had laboratory confirmed pulmonary Mtb disease. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was nested within two TB contact tracing studies and collected data from 2017 to 2019. TB index patients and their households in three provinces of South Africa were recruited. A questionnaire was administered to households, assessing type and number of animals owned, degree of exposure of animals to humans, and veterinary consultations. For this analysis, we compared descriptive variables by animal-keeping status (animal-keeping vs non-animal keeping households), calculated the chi square and respective p-values. RESULTS: We visited 1766 households with at least one confirmed case of TB, 33% (587/1766) had livestock or companion animals. Of non-animal-owning households, 2% (27/1161) cared for other community members' livestock. Few (16%, 92/587) households kept animals in their dwelling overnight, while 45% (266/587) kept animals outside the home, but within 10 m of where people slept and ate. Most (81%, 478/587) of people in animal-owning households were willing for their animal/s to have a TB skin test, but <1% (5/587) of animals had been skin-tested; 4% (24/587) of animal-owning households had a veterinary consultation in the past six months, and 5% (31/587) reported one of their animals dying from natural causes in the prior six months. CONCLUSION: Our survey suggests that a high proportion of patients with TB live in settings facilitating close contact with domestic animal species with known susceptibility to Mtb. There is a substantial exposure of household animals to patients with TB and therefore risk of both transmission to, and spillback from animals to humans.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8417387
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84173872021-09-08 Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission() Moyo, Maureen Lebina, Limakatso Milovanovic, Minja MacPherson, Peter Michel, Anita Martinson, Neil One Health Research Paper BACKGROUND: Human-to-animal transmission of M. tuberculosis (Mtb) is reported in South Africa but there is a paucity of epidemiological data. The aim of this One Health manuscript is to describe zooanthroponotic exposure of domestic animals to TB patients, virtually all of whom had laboratory confirmed pulmonary Mtb disease. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was nested within two TB contact tracing studies and collected data from 2017 to 2019. TB index patients and their households in three provinces of South Africa were recruited. A questionnaire was administered to households, assessing type and number of animals owned, degree of exposure of animals to humans, and veterinary consultations. For this analysis, we compared descriptive variables by animal-keeping status (animal-keeping vs non-animal keeping households), calculated the chi square and respective p-values. RESULTS: We visited 1766 households with at least one confirmed case of TB, 33% (587/1766) had livestock or companion animals. Of non-animal-owning households, 2% (27/1161) cared for other community members' livestock. Few (16%, 92/587) households kept animals in their dwelling overnight, while 45% (266/587) kept animals outside the home, but within 10 m of where people slept and ate. Most (81%, 478/587) of people in animal-owning households were willing for their animal/s to have a TB skin test, but <1% (5/587) of animals had been skin-tested; 4% (24/587) of animal-owning households had a veterinary consultation in the past six months, and 5% (31/587) reported one of their animals dying from natural causes in the prior six months. CONCLUSION: Our survey suggests that a high proportion of patients with TB live in settings facilitating close contact with domestic animal species with known susceptibility to Mtb. There is a substantial exposure of household animals to patients with TB and therefore risk of both transmission to, and spillback from animals to humans. Elsevier 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8417387/ /pubmed/34504938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100319 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Moyo, Maureen
Lebina, Limakatso
Milovanovic, Minja
MacPherson, Peter
Michel, Anita
Martinson, Neil
Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission()
title Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission()
title_full Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission()
title_fullStr Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission()
title_full_unstemmed Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission()
title_short Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission()
title_sort tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission()
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417387/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100319
work_keys_str_mv AT moyomaureen tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission
AT lebinalimakatso tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission
AT milovanovicminja tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission
AT macphersonpeter tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission
AT michelanita tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission
AT martinsonneil tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission