Cargando…
Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission()
BACKGROUND: Human-to-animal transmission of M. tuberculosis (Mtb) is reported in South Africa but there is a paucity of epidemiological data. The aim of this One Health manuscript is to describe zooanthroponotic exposure of domestic animals to TB patients, virtually all of whom had laboratory confir...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100319 |
_version_ | 1783748370212323328 |
---|---|
author | Moyo, Maureen Lebina, Limakatso Milovanovic, Minja MacPherson, Peter Michel, Anita Martinson, Neil |
author_facet | Moyo, Maureen Lebina, Limakatso Milovanovic, Minja MacPherson, Peter Michel, Anita Martinson, Neil |
author_sort | Moyo, Maureen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Human-to-animal transmission of M. tuberculosis (Mtb) is reported in South Africa but there is a paucity of epidemiological data. The aim of this One Health manuscript is to describe zooanthroponotic exposure of domestic animals to TB patients, virtually all of whom had laboratory confirmed pulmonary Mtb disease. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was nested within two TB contact tracing studies and collected data from 2017 to 2019. TB index patients and their households in three provinces of South Africa were recruited. A questionnaire was administered to households, assessing type and number of animals owned, degree of exposure of animals to humans, and veterinary consultations. For this analysis, we compared descriptive variables by animal-keeping status (animal-keeping vs non-animal keeping households), calculated the chi square and respective p-values. RESULTS: We visited 1766 households with at least one confirmed case of TB, 33% (587/1766) had livestock or companion animals. Of non-animal-owning households, 2% (27/1161) cared for other community members' livestock. Few (16%, 92/587) households kept animals in their dwelling overnight, while 45% (266/587) kept animals outside the home, but within 10 m of where people slept and ate. Most (81%, 478/587) of people in animal-owning households were willing for their animal/s to have a TB skin test, but <1% (5/587) of animals had been skin-tested; 4% (24/587) of animal-owning households had a veterinary consultation in the past six months, and 5% (31/587) reported one of their animals dying from natural causes in the prior six months. CONCLUSION: Our survey suggests that a high proportion of patients with TB live in settings facilitating close contact with domestic animal species with known susceptibility to Mtb. There is a substantial exposure of household animals to patients with TB and therefore risk of both transmission to, and spillback from animals to humans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8417387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84173872021-09-08 Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission() Moyo, Maureen Lebina, Limakatso Milovanovic, Minja MacPherson, Peter Michel, Anita Martinson, Neil One Health Research Paper BACKGROUND: Human-to-animal transmission of M. tuberculosis (Mtb) is reported in South Africa but there is a paucity of epidemiological data. The aim of this One Health manuscript is to describe zooanthroponotic exposure of domestic animals to TB patients, virtually all of whom had laboratory confirmed pulmonary Mtb disease. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was nested within two TB contact tracing studies and collected data from 2017 to 2019. TB index patients and their households in three provinces of South Africa were recruited. A questionnaire was administered to households, assessing type and number of animals owned, degree of exposure of animals to humans, and veterinary consultations. For this analysis, we compared descriptive variables by animal-keeping status (animal-keeping vs non-animal keeping households), calculated the chi square and respective p-values. RESULTS: We visited 1766 households with at least one confirmed case of TB, 33% (587/1766) had livestock or companion animals. Of non-animal-owning households, 2% (27/1161) cared for other community members' livestock. Few (16%, 92/587) households kept animals in their dwelling overnight, while 45% (266/587) kept animals outside the home, but within 10 m of where people slept and ate. Most (81%, 478/587) of people in animal-owning households were willing for their animal/s to have a TB skin test, but <1% (5/587) of animals had been skin-tested; 4% (24/587) of animal-owning households had a veterinary consultation in the past six months, and 5% (31/587) reported one of their animals dying from natural causes in the prior six months. CONCLUSION: Our survey suggests that a high proportion of patients with TB live in settings facilitating close contact with domestic animal species with known susceptibility to Mtb. There is a substantial exposure of household animals to patients with TB and therefore risk of both transmission to, and spillback from animals to humans. Elsevier 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8417387/ /pubmed/34504938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100319 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Moyo, Maureen Lebina, Limakatso Milovanovic, Minja MacPherson, Peter Michel, Anita Martinson, Neil Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission() |
title | Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission() |
title_full | Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission() |
title_fullStr | Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission() |
title_full_unstemmed | Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission() |
title_short | Tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: Potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission() |
title_sort | tuberculosis patients at the human-animal interface: potential zooanthroponotic and zoonotic transmission() |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34504938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100319 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moyomaureen tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission AT lebinalimakatso tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission AT milovanovicminja tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission AT macphersonpeter tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission AT michelanita tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission AT martinsonneil tuberculosispatientsatthehumananimalinterfacepotentialzooanthroponoticandzoonotictransmission |