Cargando…
A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat
Gait analysis in cats and other animals is generally performed with custom-made or commercially developed software to track reflective markers placed on bony landmarks. This often involves costly motion tracking systems. However, deep learning, and in particular DeepLabCut(TM) (DLC), allows motion t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.712623 |
_version_ | 1783748378467762176 |
---|---|
author | Lecomte, Charly G. Audet, Johannie Harnie, Jonathan Frigon, Alain |
author_facet | Lecomte, Charly G. Audet, Johannie Harnie, Jonathan Frigon, Alain |
author_sort | Lecomte, Charly G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gait analysis in cats and other animals is generally performed with custom-made or commercially developed software to track reflective markers placed on bony landmarks. This often involves costly motion tracking systems. However, deep learning, and in particular DeepLabCut(TM) (DLC), allows motion tracking without requiring placing reflective markers or an expensive system. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of DLC for gait analysis in the adult cat by comparing results obtained with DLC and a custom-made software (Expresso) that has been used in several cat studies. Four intact adult cats performed tied-belt (both belts at same speed) and split-belt (belts operating at different speeds) locomotion at different speeds and left-right speed differences on a split-belt treadmill. We calculated several kinematic variables, such as step/stride lengths and joint angles from the estimates made by the two software and assessed the agreement between the two measurements using intraclass correlation coefficient or Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient as well as Pearson’s correlation coefficients. The results showed that DLC is at least as precise as Expresso with good to excellent agreement for all variables. Indeed, all 12 variables showed an agreement above 0.75, considered good, while nine showed an agreement above 0.9, considered excellent. Therefore, deep learning, specifically DLC, is valid for measuring kinematic variables during locomotion in cats, without requiring reflective markers and using a relatively low-cost system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8417424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84174242021-09-05 A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat Lecomte, Charly G. Audet, Johannie Harnie, Jonathan Frigon, Alain Front Neuroinform Neuroscience Gait analysis in cats and other animals is generally performed with custom-made or commercially developed software to track reflective markers placed on bony landmarks. This often involves costly motion tracking systems. However, deep learning, and in particular DeepLabCut(TM) (DLC), allows motion tracking without requiring placing reflective markers or an expensive system. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of DLC for gait analysis in the adult cat by comparing results obtained with DLC and a custom-made software (Expresso) that has been used in several cat studies. Four intact adult cats performed tied-belt (both belts at same speed) and split-belt (belts operating at different speeds) locomotion at different speeds and left-right speed differences on a split-belt treadmill. We calculated several kinematic variables, such as step/stride lengths and joint angles from the estimates made by the two software and assessed the agreement between the two measurements using intraclass correlation coefficient or Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient as well as Pearson’s correlation coefficients. The results showed that DLC is at least as precise as Expresso with good to excellent agreement for all variables. Indeed, all 12 variables showed an agreement above 0.75, considered good, while nine showed an agreement above 0.9, considered excellent. Therefore, deep learning, specifically DLC, is valid for measuring kinematic variables during locomotion in cats, without requiring reflective markers and using a relatively low-cost system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8417424/ /pubmed/34489668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.712623 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lecomte, Audet, Harnie and Frigon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Lecomte, Charly G. Audet, Johannie Harnie, Jonathan Frigon, Alain A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat |
title | A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat |
title_full | A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat |
title_fullStr | A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat |
title_full_unstemmed | A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat |
title_short | A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat |
title_sort | validation of supervised deep learning for gait analysis in the cat |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.712623 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lecomtecharlyg avalidationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat AT audetjohannie avalidationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat AT harniejonathan avalidationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat AT frigonalain avalidationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat AT lecomtecharlyg validationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat AT audetjohannie validationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat AT harniejonathan validationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat AT frigonalain validationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat |