Cargando…

A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat

Gait analysis in cats and other animals is generally performed with custom-made or commercially developed software to track reflective markers placed on bony landmarks. This often involves costly motion tracking systems. However, deep learning, and in particular DeepLabCut(TM) (DLC), allows motion t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lecomte, Charly G., Audet, Johannie, Harnie, Jonathan, Frigon, Alain
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.712623
_version_ 1783748378467762176
author Lecomte, Charly G.
Audet, Johannie
Harnie, Jonathan
Frigon, Alain
author_facet Lecomte, Charly G.
Audet, Johannie
Harnie, Jonathan
Frigon, Alain
author_sort Lecomte, Charly G.
collection PubMed
description Gait analysis in cats and other animals is generally performed with custom-made or commercially developed software to track reflective markers placed on bony landmarks. This often involves costly motion tracking systems. However, deep learning, and in particular DeepLabCut(TM) (DLC), allows motion tracking without requiring placing reflective markers or an expensive system. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of DLC for gait analysis in the adult cat by comparing results obtained with DLC and a custom-made software (Expresso) that has been used in several cat studies. Four intact adult cats performed tied-belt (both belts at same speed) and split-belt (belts operating at different speeds) locomotion at different speeds and left-right speed differences on a split-belt treadmill. We calculated several kinematic variables, such as step/stride lengths and joint angles from the estimates made by the two software and assessed the agreement between the two measurements using intraclass correlation coefficient or Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient as well as Pearson’s correlation coefficients. The results showed that DLC is at least as precise as Expresso with good to excellent agreement for all variables. Indeed, all 12 variables showed an agreement above 0.75, considered good, while nine showed an agreement above 0.9, considered excellent. Therefore, deep learning, specifically DLC, is valid for measuring kinematic variables during locomotion in cats, without requiring reflective markers and using a relatively low-cost system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8417424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84174242021-09-05 A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat Lecomte, Charly G. Audet, Johannie Harnie, Jonathan Frigon, Alain Front Neuroinform Neuroscience Gait analysis in cats and other animals is generally performed with custom-made or commercially developed software to track reflective markers placed on bony landmarks. This often involves costly motion tracking systems. However, deep learning, and in particular DeepLabCut(TM) (DLC), allows motion tracking without requiring placing reflective markers or an expensive system. The purpose of this study was to validate the accuracy of DLC for gait analysis in the adult cat by comparing results obtained with DLC and a custom-made software (Expresso) that has been used in several cat studies. Four intact adult cats performed tied-belt (both belts at same speed) and split-belt (belts operating at different speeds) locomotion at different speeds and left-right speed differences on a split-belt treadmill. We calculated several kinematic variables, such as step/stride lengths and joint angles from the estimates made by the two software and assessed the agreement between the two measurements using intraclass correlation coefficient or Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient as well as Pearson’s correlation coefficients. The results showed that DLC is at least as precise as Expresso with good to excellent agreement for all variables. Indeed, all 12 variables showed an agreement above 0.75, considered good, while nine showed an agreement above 0.9, considered excellent. Therefore, deep learning, specifically DLC, is valid for measuring kinematic variables during locomotion in cats, without requiring reflective markers and using a relatively low-cost system. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8417424/ /pubmed/34489668 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.712623 Text en Copyright © 2021 Lecomte, Audet, Harnie and Frigon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Lecomte, Charly G.
Audet, Johannie
Harnie, Jonathan
Frigon, Alain
A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat
title A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat
title_full A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat
title_fullStr A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat
title_full_unstemmed A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat
title_short A Validation of Supervised Deep Learning for Gait Analysis in the Cat
title_sort validation of supervised deep learning for gait analysis in the cat
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489668
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.712623
work_keys_str_mv AT lecomtecharlyg avalidationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat
AT audetjohannie avalidationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat
AT harniejonathan avalidationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat
AT frigonalain avalidationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat
AT lecomtecharlyg validationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat
AT audetjohannie validationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat
AT harniejonathan validationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat
AT frigonalain validationofsuperviseddeeplearningforgaitanalysisinthecat