Cargando…

Estimation and Discriminability of Doppler Ultrasound Fetal Heart Rate Variability Measures

Continuous electronic fetal monitoring and the access to databases of fetal heart rate (FHR) data have sparked the application of machine learning classifiers to identify fetal pathologies. However, most fetal heart rate data are acquired using Doppler ultrasound (DUS). DUS signals use autocorrelati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vargas-Calixto, Johann, Warrick, Philip, Kearney, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.674238
_version_ 1783748394656727040
author Vargas-Calixto, Johann
Warrick, Philip
Kearney, Robert
author_facet Vargas-Calixto, Johann
Warrick, Philip
Kearney, Robert
author_sort Vargas-Calixto, Johann
collection PubMed
description Continuous electronic fetal monitoring and the access to databases of fetal heart rate (FHR) data have sparked the application of machine learning classifiers to identify fetal pathologies. However, most fetal heart rate data are acquired using Doppler ultrasound (DUS). DUS signals use autocorrelation (AC) to estimate the average heartbeat period within a window. In consequence, DUS FHR signals loses high frequency information to an extent that depends on the length of the AC window. We examined the effect of this on the estimation bias and discriminability of frequency domain features: low frequency power (LF: 0.03–0.15 Hz), movement frequency power (MF: 0.15–0.5 Hz), high frequency power (HF: 0.5–1 Hz), the LF/(MF + HF) ratio, and the nonlinear approximate entropy (ApEn) as a function of AC window length and signal to noise ratio. We found that the average discriminability loss across all evaluated AC window lengths and SNRs was 10.99% for LF 14.23% for MF, 13.33% for the HF, 10.39% for the LF/(MF + HF) ratio, and 24.17% for ApEn. This indicates that the frequency domain features are more robust to the AC method and additive noise than the ApEn. This is likely because additive noise increases the irregularity of the signals, which results in an overestimation of ApEn. In conclusion, our study found that the LF features are the most robust to the effects of the AC method and noise. Future studies should investigate the effect of other variables such as signal drop, gestational age, and the length of the analysis window on the estimation of fHRV features and their discriminability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8417534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84175342021-09-05 Estimation and Discriminability of Doppler Ultrasound Fetal Heart Rate Variability Measures Vargas-Calixto, Johann Warrick, Philip Kearney, Robert Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence Continuous electronic fetal monitoring and the access to databases of fetal heart rate (FHR) data have sparked the application of machine learning classifiers to identify fetal pathologies. However, most fetal heart rate data are acquired using Doppler ultrasound (DUS). DUS signals use autocorrelation (AC) to estimate the average heartbeat period within a window. In consequence, DUS FHR signals loses high frequency information to an extent that depends on the length of the AC window. We examined the effect of this on the estimation bias and discriminability of frequency domain features: low frequency power (LF: 0.03–0.15 Hz), movement frequency power (MF: 0.15–0.5 Hz), high frequency power (HF: 0.5–1 Hz), the LF/(MF + HF) ratio, and the nonlinear approximate entropy (ApEn) as a function of AC window length and signal to noise ratio. We found that the average discriminability loss across all evaluated AC window lengths and SNRs was 10.99% for LF 14.23% for MF, 13.33% for the HF, 10.39% for the LF/(MF + HF) ratio, and 24.17% for ApEn. This indicates that the frequency domain features are more robust to the AC method and additive noise than the ApEn. This is likely because additive noise increases the irregularity of the signals, which results in an overestimation of ApEn. In conclusion, our study found that the LF features are the most robust to the effects of the AC method and noise. Future studies should investigate the effect of other variables such as signal drop, gestational age, and the length of the analysis window on the estimation of fHRV features and their discriminability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8417534/ /pubmed/34490419 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.674238 Text en Copyright © 2021 Vargas-Calixto, Warrick and Kearney. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
Vargas-Calixto, Johann
Warrick, Philip
Kearney, Robert
Estimation and Discriminability of Doppler Ultrasound Fetal Heart Rate Variability Measures
title Estimation and Discriminability of Doppler Ultrasound Fetal Heart Rate Variability Measures
title_full Estimation and Discriminability of Doppler Ultrasound Fetal Heart Rate Variability Measures
title_fullStr Estimation and Discriminability of Doppler Ultrasound Fetal Heart Rate Variability Measures
title_full_unstemmed Estimation and Discriminability of Doppler Ultrasound Fetal Heart Rate Variability Measures
title_short Estimation and Discriminability of Doppler Ultrasound Fetal Heart Rate Variability Measures
title_sort estimation and discriminability of doppler ultrasound fetal heart rate variability measures
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490419
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.674238
work_keys_str_mv AT vargascalixtojohann estimationanddiscriminabilityofdopplerultrasoundfetalheartratevariabilitymeasures
AT warrickphilip estimationanddiscriminabilityofdopplerultrasoundfetalheartratevariabilitymeasures
AT kearneyrobert estimationanddiscriminabilityofdopplerultrasoundfetalheartratevariabilitymeasures