Cargando…
A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The extrusion of intracanal debris is one of the challenging problems related to almost all root canal preparation systems, which may cause flare-ups and impairment in the healing process. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the amount of apically-extruded debris...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514067 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100 |
_version_ | 1783748396097470464 |
---|---|
author | Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza Shokouhi, Mohammad Mehdi Kheirandish, Mojgan Sahebi, Safoora Sadatshojaee, Nooshin Abbaszadegan, Abbas |
author_facet | Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza Shokouhi, Mohammad Mehdi Kheirandish, Mojgan Sahebi, Safoora Sadatshojaee, Nooshin Abbaszadegan, Abbas |
author_sort | Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza |
collection | PubMed |
description | STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The extrusion of intracanal debris is one of the challenging problems related to almost all root canal preparation systems, which may cause flare-ups and impairment in the healing process. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the amount of apically-extruded debris during root canal preparation using Medin (MEDIN Co., Czech Republic) rotary system compared with two common rotary systems, including ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer., Switzerland) and RaCe (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland). MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this in vitro study, Sixty mandibular premolars with single canal were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20). The root canals were prepared with Medin, ProTaper, and RaCe rotary instruments based on their manufacturers’ instructions. The debris were collected into pre-weighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the pretreatment weight of the vials. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Medin instrument caused significantly less debris extrusion in comparison with ProTaper and RaCe (p< 0.05). The differences between the ProTaper and RaCe rotary systems were not statistically significant (p= 0.752). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Medin rotary system produced less apical extrusion than ProTaper and RaCe. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8417540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Shiraz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84175402021-09-10 A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza Shokouhi, Mohammad Mehdi Kheirandish, Mojgan Sahebi, Safoora Sadatshojaee, Nooshin Abbaszadegan, Abbas J Dent (Shiraz) Original Article STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The extrusion of intracanal debris is one of the challenging problems related to almost all root canal preparation systems, which may cause flare-ups and impairment in the healing process. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the amount of apically-extruded debris during root canal preparation using Medin (MEDIN Co., Czech Republic) rotary system compared with two common rotary systems, including ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer., Switzerland) and RaCe (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland). MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this in vitro study, Sixty mandibular premolars with single canal were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20). The root canals were prepared with Medin, ProTaper, and RaCe rotary instruments based on their manufacturers’ instructions. The debris were collected into pre-weighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the pretreatment weight of the vials. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Medin instrument caused significantly less debris extrusion in comparison with ProTaper and RaCe (p< 0.05). The differences between the ProTaper and RaCe rotary systems were not statistically significant (p= 0.752). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Medin rotary system produced less apical extrusion than ProTaper and RaCe. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8417540/ /pubmed/34514067 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza Shokouhi, Mohammad Mehdi Kheirandish, Mojgan Sahebi, Safoora Sadatshojaee, Nooshin Abbaszadegan, Abbas A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems |
title | A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems |
title_full | A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems |
title_short | A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems |
title_sort | comparison of the apical extrusion of debris during the preparation of root canal with medin, race, and protaper rotary systems |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514067 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nabavizadehmohammadreza acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT shokouhimohammadmehdi acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT kheirandishmojgan acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT sahebisafoora acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT sadatshojaeenooshin acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT abbaszadeganabbas acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT nabavizadehmohammadreza comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT shokouhimohammadmehdi comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT kheirandishmojgan comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT sahebisafoora comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT sadatshojaeenooshin comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems AT abbaszadeganabbas comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems |