Cargando…

A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems

STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The extrusion of intracanal debris is one of the challenging problems related to almost all root canal preparation systems, which may cause flare-ups and impairment in the healing process. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the amount of apically-extruded debris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza, Shokouhi, Mohammad Mehdi, Kheirandish, Mojgan, Sahebi, Safoora, Sadatshojaee, Nooshin, Abbaszadegan, Abbas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514067
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100
_version_ 1783748396097470464
author Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza
Shokouhi, Mohammad Mehdi
Kheirandish, Mojgan
Sahebi, Safoora
Sadatshojaee, Nooshin
Abbaszadegan, Abbas
author_facet Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza
Shokouhi, Mohammad Mehdi
Kheirandish, Mojgan
Sahebi, Safoora
Sadatshojaee, Nooshin
Abbaszadegan, Abbas
author_sort Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza
collection PubMed
description STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The extrusion of intracanal debris is one of the challenging problems related to almost all root canal preparation systems, which may cause flare-ups and impairment in the healing process. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the amount of apically-extruded debris during root canal preparation using Medin (MEDIN Co., Czech Republic) rotary system compared with two common rotary systems, including ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer., Switzerland) and RaCe (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland). MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this in vitro study, Sixty mandibular premolars with single canal were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20). The root canals were prepared with Medin, ProTaper, and RaCe rotary instruments based on their manufacturers’ instructions. The debris were collected into pre-weighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the pretreatment weight of the vials. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Medin instrument caused significantly less debris extrusion in comparison with ProTaper and RaCe (p< 0.05). The differences between the ProTaper and RaCe rotary systems were not statistically significant (p= 0.752). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Medin rotary system produced less apical extrusion than ProTaper and RaCe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8417540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84175402021-09-10 A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza Shokouhi, Mohammad Mehdi Kheirandish, Mojgan Sahebi, Safoora Sadatshojaee, Nooshin Abbaszadegan, Abbas J Dent (Shiraz) Original Article STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM: The extrusion of intracanal debris is one of the challenging problems related to almost all root canal preparation systems, which may cause flare-ups and impairment in the healing process. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the amount of apically-extruded debris during root canal preparation using Medin (MEDIN Co., Czech Republic) rotary system compared with two common rotary systems, including ProTaper (Dentsply Maillefer., Switzerland) and RaCe (FKG Dentaire, Switzerland). MATERIALS AND METHOD: In this in vitro study, Sixty mandibular premolars with single canal were randomly assigned to three groups (n=20). The root canals were prepared with Medin, ProTaper, and RaCe rotary instruments based on their manufacturers’ instructions. The debris were collected into pre-weighted Eppendorf tubes. The weight of the extruded debris was calculated by subtracting the pretreatment weight of the vials. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test at a 5% significance level. RESULTS: Medin instrument caused significantly less debris extrusion in comparison with ProTaper and RaCe (p< 0.05). The differences between the ProTaper and RaCe rotary systems were not statistically significant (p= 0.752). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, Medin rotary system produced less apical extrusion than ProTaper and RaCe. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8417540/ /pubmed/34514067 http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Unported License, ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nabavizadeh, Mohammadreza
Shokouhi, Mohammad Mehdi
Kheirandish, Mojgan
Sahebi, Safoora
Sadatshojaee, Nooshin
Abbaszadegan, Abbas
A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
title A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
title_full A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
title_short A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
title_sort comparison of the apical extrusion of debris during the preparation of root canal with medin, race, and protaper rotary systems
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514067
http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/DENTJODS.2020.84776.1100
work_keys_str_mv AT nabavizadehmohammadreza acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT shokouhimohammadmehdi acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT kheirandishmojgan acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT sahebisafoora acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT sadatshojaeenooshin acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT abbaszadeganabbas acomparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT nabavizadehmohammadreza comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT shokouhimohammadmehdi comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT kheirandishmojgan comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT sahebisafoora comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT sadatshojaeenooshin comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems
AT abbaszadeganabbas comparisonoftheapicalextrusionofdebrisduringthepreparationofrootcanalwithmedinraceandprotaperrotarysystems