Cargando…
How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic?
The impact of Covid-19 has had a far reaching effect on higher education institutions. However, few studies report on the relative perceptions of students about face-to-face (F2F) and blended learning (BL) in periods when Covid-19 is/not a consideration. Using a sample of 103/79 undergraduate studen...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417584/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552 |
_version_ | 1783748406548627456 |
---|---|
author | Mali, Dafydd Lim, Hyoungjoo |
author_facet | Mali, Dafydd Lim, Hyoungjoo |
author_sort | Mali, Dafydd |
collection | PubMed |
description | The impact of Covid-19 has had a far reaching effect on higher education institutions. However, few studies report on the relative perceptions of students about face-to-face (F2F) and blended learning (BL) in periods when Covid-19 is/not a consideration. Using a sample of 103/79 undergraduate students, a mixed-method approach is utilized to report qualitative and quantitative evidence regarding student perceptions. The results demonstrate BL is perceived more positively during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, F2F is preferred to BL when Covid is not an issue. F2F learning is perceived more positively to BL because students feel that there are limitations to BL in terms of; interactions with the lecturer; group work; peer engagement; class involvement; and the ability to ask questions about technical information. Moreover, qualitative evidence shows that students perceive F2F to be superior to BL because social elements expected in a F2F environment may not be embedded into netiquette frameworks. From a policymaking standpoint, we encourage embedding social elements into BL to enhance student experience so that student's negative attitudes regarding the transition from F2F delivery to online/BL can be minimized. From a practical standpoint, we provide insights about strategies to embed socials elements into netiquette frameworks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8417584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84175842021-09-07 How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? Mali, Dafydd Lim, Hyoungjoo The International Journal of Management Education Article The impact of Covid-19 has had a far reaching effect on higher education institutions. However, few studies report on the relative perceptions of students about face-to-face (F2F) and blended learning (BL) in periods when Covid-19 is/not a consideration. Using a sample of 103/79 undergraduate students, a mixed-method approach is utilized to report qualitative and quantitative evidence regarding student perceptions. The results demonstrate BL is perceived more positively during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, F2F is preferred to BL when Covid is not an issue. F2F learning is perceived more positively to BL because students feel that there are limitations to BL in terms of; interactions with the lecturer; group work; peer engagement; class involvement; and the ability to ask questions about technical information. Moreover, qualitative evidence shows that students perceive F2F to be superior to BL because social elements expected in a F2F environment may not be embedded into netiquette frameworks. From a policymaking standpoint, we encourage embedding social elements into BL to enhance student experience so that student's negative attitudes regarding the transition from F2F delivery to online/BL can be minimized. From a practical standpoint, we provide insights about strategies to embed socials elements into netiquette frameworks. Elsevier Ltd. 2021-11 2021-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8417584/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Mali, Dafydd Lim, Hyoungjoo How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? |
title | How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? |
title_full | How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? |
title_fullStr | How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? |
title_full_unstemmed | How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? |
title_short | How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic? |
title_sort | how do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the covid-19 pandemic? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417584/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2021.100552 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malidafydd howdostudentsperceivefacetofaceblendedlearningasaresultofthecovid19pandemic AT limhyoungjoo howdostudentsperceivefacetofaceblendedlearningasaresultofthecovid19pandemic |