Cargando…

Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing

Background: Little is known about the efficacy of permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of LBBAP on mechanical synchronization and myocardial work (MW) in heart failure (HF) patients and to comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Wen, Hu, Chunqiang, Wang, Yanan, Cheng, Yufei, Zhao, Yingjie, Liu, Yang, Zheng, Shaoxin, Chen, Haiyan, Shu, Xianhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.727611
_version_ 1783748408426627072
author Liu, Wen
Hu, Chunqiang
Wang, Yanan
Cheng, Yufei
Zhao, Yingjie
Liu, Yang
Zheng, Shaoxin
Chen, Haiyan
Shu, Xianhong
author_facet Liu, Wen
Hu, Chunqiang
Wang, Yanan
Cheng, Yufei
Zhao, Yingjie
Liu, Yang
Zheng, Shaoxin
Chen, Haiyan
Shu, Xianhong
author_sort Liu, Wen
collection PubMed
description Background: Little is known about the efficacy of permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of LBBAP on mechanical synchronization and myocardial work (MW) in heart failure (HF) patients and to compare LBBAP with biventricular pacing (BVP). Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study. From February 2018 to January 2021, 62 consecutive HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 35%) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) who underwent LBBAP or BVP were enrolled in this study. Echocardiograms and electrocardiograms and were conducted before and 3–6 months after implantation. Intra- and interventricular synchronization were assessed using two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI). The left ventricular pressure-strain loop was obtained by combining left ventricular strain with non-invasive blood pressure to evaluate mechanical efficiency. Results: The echocardiographic response rates were 68.6 and 88.9% in the BVP and LBBAP groups, respectively. Left bundle branch area pacing resulted in significant QRS narrowing (from 177.1 ± 16.7 to 113.0 ± 18.4 ms, P < 0.001) and improvement in LVEF (from 29.9 ± 4.8 to 47.1 ± 8.3%, P < 0.001). The global wasted work (GWW) (410.3 ± 166.6 vs. 283.0 ± 129.6 mmHg%, P = 0.001) and global work efficiency (GWE) (64.6 ± 7.8 vs. 80.5 ± 5.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly improved along with shorter peak strain dispersion (PSD) (143.4 ± 45.2 vs. 92.6 ± 35.1 ms, P < 0.001) and interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) (56.4 ± 28.5 vs. 28.9 ± 19.0 ms, P < 0.001), indicating its efficiency in improving mechanical synchronization. In comparison with BVP, LBBAP delivered greater improvement of QRS narrowing (−64.1 ± 18.9 vs. −32.5 ± 22.3 ms, P < 0.001) and better mechanical synchronization and efficiency. Conclusions: Left bundle branch area pacing was effective in improving cardiac function, mechanical synchronization, and mechanical efficiency and may be a promising alternative cardiac resynchronization therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8417592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84175922021-09-05 Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing Liu, Wen Hu, Chunqiang Wang, Yanan Cheng, Yufei Zhao, Yingjie Liu, Yang Zheng, Shaoxin Chen, Haiyan Shu, Xianhong Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: Little is known about the efficacy of permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of LBBAP on mechanical synchronization and myocardial work (MW) in heart failure (HF) patients and to compare LBBAP with biventricular pacing (BVP). Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study. From February 2018 to January 2021, 62 consecutive HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 35%) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) who underwent LBBAP or BVP were enrolled in this study. Echocardiograms and electrocardiograms and were conducted before and 3–6 months after implantation. Intra- and interventricular synchronization were assessed using two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI). The left ventricular pressure-strain loop was obtained by combining left ventricular strain with non-invasive blood pressure to evaluate mechanical efficiency. Results: The echocardiographic response rates were 68.6 and 88.9% in the BVP and LBBAP groups, respectively. Left bundle branch area pacing resulted in significant QRS narrowing (from 177.1 ± 16.7 to 113.0 ± 18.4 ms, P < 0.001) and improvement in LVEF (from 29.9 ± 4.8 to 47.1 ± 8.3%, P < 0.001). The global wasted work (GWW) (410.3 ± 166.6 vs. 283.0 ± 129.6 mmHg%, P = 0.001) and global work efficiency (GWE) (64.6 ± 7.8 vs. 80.5 ± 5.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly improved along with shorter peak strain dispersion (PSD) (143.4 ± 45.2 vs. 92.6 ± 35.1 ms, P < 0.001) and interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) (56.4 ± 28.5 vs. 28.9 ± 19.0 ms, P < 0.001), indicating its efficiency in improving mechanical synchronization. In comparison with BVP, LBBAP delivered greater improvement of QRS narrowing (−64.1 ± 18.9 vs. −32.5 ± 22.3 ms, P < 0.001) and better mechanical synchronization and efficiency. Conclusions: Left bundle branch area pacing was effective in improving cardiac function, mechanical synchronization, and mechanical efficiency and may be a promising alternative cardiac resynchronization therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8417592/ /pubmed/34490382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.727611 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liu, Hu, Wang, Cheng, Zhao, Liu, Zheng, Chen and Shu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Liu, Wen
Hu, Chunqiang
Wang, Yanan
Cheng, Yufei
Zhao, Yingjie
Liu, Yang
Zheng, Shaoxin
Chen, Haiyan
Shu, Xianhong
Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing
title Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing
title_full Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing
title_fullStr Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing
title_short Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing
title_sort mechanical synchrony and myocardial work in heart failure patients with left bundle branch area pacing and comparison with biventricular pacing
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490382
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.727611
work_keys_str_mv AT liuwen mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing
AT huchunqiang mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing
AT wangyanan mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing
AT chengyufei mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing
AT zhaoyingjie mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing
AT liuyang mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing
AT zhengshaoxin mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing
AT chenhaiyan mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing
AT shuxianhong mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing