Cargando…
Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing
Background: Little is known about the efficacy of permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of LBBAP on mechanical synchronization and myocardial work (MW) in heart failure (HF) patients and to comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.727611 |
_version_ | 1783748408426627072 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Wen Hu, Chunqiang Wang, Yanan Cheng, Yufei Zhao, Yingjie Liu, Yang Zheng, Shaoxin Chen, Haiyan Shu, Xianhong |
author_facet | Liu, Wen Hu, Chunqiang Wang, Yanan Cheng, Yufei Zhao, Yingjie Liu, Yang Zheng, Shaoxin Chen, Haiyan Shu, Xianhong |
author_sort | Liu, Wen |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Little is known about the efficacy of permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of LBBAP on mechanical synchronization and myocardial work (MW) in heart failure (HF) patients and to compare LBBAP with biventricular pacing (BVP). Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study. From February 2018 to January 2021, 62 consecutive HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 35%) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) who underwent LBBAP or BVP were enrolled in this study. Echocardiograms and electrocardiograms and were conducted before and 3–6 months after implantation. Intra- and interventricular synchronization were assessed using two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI). The left ventricular pressure-strain loop was obtained by combining left ventricular strain with non-invasive blood pressure to evaluate mechanical efficiency. Results: The echocardiographic response rates were 68.6 and 88.9% in the BVP and LBBAP groups, respectively. Left bundle branch area pacing resulted in significant QRS narrowing (from 177.1 ± 16.7 to 113.0 ± 18.4 ms, P < 0.001) and improvement in LVEF (from 29.9 ± 4.8 to 47.1 ± 8.3%, P < 0.001). The global wasted work (GWW) (410.3 ± 166.6 vs. 283.0 ± 129.6 mmHg%, P = 0.001) and global work efficiency (GWE) (64.6 ± 7.8 vs. 80.5 ± 5.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly improved along with shorter peak strain dispersion (PSD) (143.4 ± 45.2 vs. 92.6 ± 35.1 ms, P < 0.001) and interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) (56.4 ± 28.5 vs. 28.9 ± 19.0 ms, P < 0.001), indicating its efficiency in improving mechanical synchronization. In comparison with BVP, LBBAP delivered greater improvement of QRS narrowing (−64.1 ± 18.9 vs. −32.5 ± 22.3 ms, P < 0.001) and better mechanical synchronization and efficiency. Conclusions: Left bundle branch area pacing was effective in improving cardiac function, mechanical synchronization, and mechanical efficiency and may be a promising alternative cardiac resynchronization therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8417592 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84175922021-09-05 Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing Liu, Wen Hu, Chunqiang Wang, Yanan Cheng, Yufei Zhao, Yingjie Liu, Yang Zheng, Shaoxin Chen, Haiyan Shu, Xianhong Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: Little is known about the efficacy of permanent left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of LBBAP on mechanical synchronization and myocardial work (MW) in heart failure (HF) patients and to compare LBBAP with biventricular pacing (BVP). Methods: This is a multicenter, prospective cohort study. From February 2018 to January 2021, 62 consecutive HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF ≤ 35%) and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) who underwent LBBAP or BVP were enrolled in this study. Echocardiograms and electrocardiograms and were conducted before and 3–6 months after implantation. Intra- and interventricular synchronization were assessed using two-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (2D-STI). The left ventricular pressure-strain loop was obtained by combining left ventricular strain with non-invasive blood pressure to evaluate mechanical efficiency. Results: The echocardiographic response rates were 68.6 and 88.9% in the BVP and LBBAP groups, respectively. Left bundle branch area pacing resulted in significant QRS narrowing (from 177.1 ± 16.7 to 113.0 ± 18.4 ms, P < 0.001) and improvement in LVEF (from 29.9 ± 4.8 to 47.1 ± 8.3%, P < 0.001). The global wasted work (GWW) (410.3 ± 166.6 vs. 283.0 ± 129.6 mmHg%, P = 0.001) and global work efficiency (GWE) (64.6 ± 7.8 vs. 80.5 ± 5.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly improved along with shorter peak strain dispersion (PSD) (143.4 ± 45.2 vs. 92.6 ± 35.1 ms, P < 0.001) and interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) (56.4 ± 28.5 vs. 28.9 ± 19.0 ms, P < 0.001), indicating its efficiency in improving mechanical synchronization. In comparison with BVP, LBBAP delivered greater improvement of QRS narrowing (−64.1 ± 18.9 vs. −32.5 ± 22.3 ms, P < 0.001) and better mechanical synchronization and efficiency. Conclusions: Left bundle branch area pacing was effective in improving cardiac function, mechanical synchronization, and mechanical efficiency and may be a promising alternative cardiac resynchronization therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8417592/ /pubmed/34490382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.727611 Text en Copyright © 2021 Liu, Hu, Wang, Cheng, Zhao, Liu, Zheng, Chen and Shu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Liu, Wen Hu, Chunqiang Wang, Yanan Cheng, Yufei Zhao, Yingjie Liu, Yang Zheng, Shaoxin Chen, Haiyan Shu, Xianhong Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing |
title | Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing |
title_full | Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing |
title_fullStr | Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing |
title_short | Mechanical Synchrony and Myocardial Work in Heart Failure Patients With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Comparison With Biventricular Pacing |
title_sort | mechanical synchrony and myocardial work in heart failure patients with left bundle branch area pacing and comparison with biventricular pacing |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417592/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490382 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.727611 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuwen mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing AT huchunqiang mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing AT wangyanan mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing AT chengyufei mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing AT zhaoyingjie mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing AT liuyang mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing AT zhengshaoxin mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing AT chenhaiyan mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing AT shuxianhong mechanicalsynchronyandmyocardialworkinheartfailurepatientswithleftbundlebranchareapacingandcomparisonwithbiventricularpacing |