Cargando…
Approaches for Ending Ineffective Programs: Strategies From State Public Health Practitioners
Background: Public health agencies are increasingly concerned with ensuring they are maximizing limited resources by delivering evidence-based programs to enhance population-level chronic disease outcomes. Yet, there is little guidance on how to end ineffective programs that continue in communities....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.727005 |
_version_ | 1783748438022684672 |
---|---|
author | Rodriguez Weno, Emily Allen, Peg Mazzucca, Stephanie Farah Saliba, Louise Padek, Margaret Moreland-Russell, Sarah Brownson, Ross C. |
author_facet | Rodriguez Weno, Emily Allen, Peg Mazzucca, Stephanie Farah Saliba, Louise Padek, Margaret Moreland-Russell, Sarah Brownson, Ross C. |
author_sort | Rodriguez Weno, Emily |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Public health agencies are increasingly concerned with ensuring they are maximizing limited resources by delivering evidence-based programs to enhance population-level chronic disease outcomes. Yet, there is little guidance on how to end ineffective programs that continue in communities. The purpose of this analysis is to identify what strategies public health practitioners perceive to be effective in de-implementing, or reducing the use of, ineffective programs. Methods: From March to July 2019, eight states were selected to participate in qualitative interviews from our previous national survey of US state health department (SHD) chronic disease practitioners on program decision making. This analysis examined responses to a question about “…advice for others who want to end an ineffective program.” Forty-five SHD employees were interviewed via phone. Interviews were audio-recorded, and the conversations were transcribed verbatim. All transcripts were consensus coded, and themes were identified and summarized. Results: Participants were program managers or section directors who had on average worked 11 years at their agency and 15 years in public health. SHD employees provided several strategies they perceived as effective for de-implementation. The major themes were: (1) collect and rely on evaluation data; (2) consider if any of the programs can be saved; (3) transparently communicate and discuss program adjustments; (4) be tactful and respectful of partner relationships; (5) communicate in a way that is meaningful to your audience. Conclusions: This analysis provides insight into how experienced SHD practitioners recommend ending ineffective programs which may be useful for others working at public health agencies. As de-implementation research is limited in public health settings, this work provides a guiding point for future researchers to systematically assess these strategies and their effects on public health programming. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8417719 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84177192021-09-05 Approaches for Ending Ineffective Programs: Strategies From State Public Health Practitioners Rodriguez Weno, Emily Allen, Peg Mazzucca, Stephanie Farah Saliba, Louise Padek, Margaret Moreland-Russell, Sarah Brownson, Ross C. Front Public Health Public Health Background: Public health agencies are increasingly concerned with ensuring they are maximizing limited resources by delivering evidence-based programs to enhance population-level chronic disease outcomes. Yet, there is little guidance on how to end ineffective programs that continue in communities. The purpose of this analysis is to identify what strategies public health practitioners perceive to be effective in de-implementing, or reducing the use of, ineffective programs. Methods: From March to July 2019, eight states were selected to participate in qualitative interviews from our previous national survey of US state health department (SHD) chronic disease practitioners on program decision making. This analysis examined responses to a question about “…advice for others who want to end an ineffective program.” Forty-five SHD employees were interviewed via phone. Interviews were audio-recorded, and the conversations were transcribed verbatim. All transcripts were consensus coded, and themes were identified and summarized. Results: Participants were program managers or section directors who had on average worked 11 years at their agency and 15 years in public health. SHD employees provided several strategies they perceived as effective for de-implementation. The major themes were: (1) collect and rely on evaluation data; (2) consider if any of the programs can be saved; (3) transparently communicate and discuss program adjustments; (4) be tactful and respectful of partner relationships; (5) communicate in a way that is meaningful to your audience. Conclusions: This analysis provides insight into how experienced SHD practitioners recommend ending ineffective programs which may be useful for others working at public health agencies. As de-implementation research is limited in public health settings, this work provides a guiding point for future researchers to systematically assess these strategies and their effects on public health programming. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8417719/ /pubmed/34490203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.727005 Text en Copyright © 2021 Rodriguez Weno, Allen, Mazzucca, Farah Saliba, Padek, Moreland-Russell and Brownson. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Rodriguez Weno, Emily Allen, Peg Mazzucca, Stephanie Farah Saliba, Louise Padek, Margaret Moreland-Russell, Sarah Brownson, Ross C. Approaches for Ending Ineffective Programs: Strategies From State Public Health Practitioners |
title | Approaches for Ending Ineffective Programs: Strategies From State Public Health Practitioners |
title_full | Approaches for Ending Ineffective Programs: Strategies From State Public Health Practitioners |
title_fullStr | Approaches for Ending Ineffective Programs: Strategies From State Public Health Practitioners |
title_full_unstemmed | Approaches for Ending Ineffective Programs: Strategies From State Public Health Practitioners |
title_short | Approaches for Ending Ineffective Programs: Strategies From State Public Health Practitioners |
title_sort | approaches for ending ineffective programs: strategies from state public health practitioners |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8417719/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490203 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.727005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguezwenoemily approachesforendingineffectiveprogramsstrategiesfromstatepublichealthpractitioners AT allenpeg approachesforendingineffectiveprogramsstrategiesfromstatepublichealthpractitioners AT mazzuccastephanie approachesforendingineffectiveprogramsstrategiesfromstatepublichealthpractitioners AT farahsalibalouise approachesforendingineffectiveprogramsstrategiesfromstatepublichealthpractitioners AT padekmargaret approachesforendingineffectiveprogramsstrategiesfromstatepublichealthpractitioners AT morelandrussellsarah approachesforendingineffectiveprogramsstrategiesfromstatepublichealthpractitioners AT brownsonrossc approachesforendingineffectiveprogramsstrategiesfromstatepublichealthpractitioners |