Cargando…

Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves

Background: The feasibility and safety of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) in patients with conduction diseases following prosthetic valves (PVs) have not been well described. Methods: Permanent LBBP was attempted in patients with PVs. Procedural success and intracardiac electrical measurements were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Hui-Qiang, Li, Hui, Liao, Hongtao, Liang, Yuanhong, Zhan, Xianzhang, Zhang, Qianhuan, Deng, Hai, Wei, Wei, Liao, Zili, Liu, Yang, Liu, Fangzhou, Lin, Weidong, Xue, Yumei, Wu, Shulin, Fang, Xianhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.705124
_version_ 1783748538073612288
author Wei, Hui-Qiang
Li, Hui
Liao, Hongtao
Liang, Yuanhong
Zhan, Xianzhang
Zhang, Qianhuan
Deng, Hai
Wei, Wei
Liao, Zili
Liu, Yang
Liu, Fangzhou
Lin, Weidong
Xue, Yumei
Wu, Shulin
Fang, Xianhong
author_facet Wei, Hui-Qiang
Li, Hui
Liao, Hongtao
Liang, Yuanhong
Zhan, Xianzhang
Zhang, Qianhuan
Deng, Hai
Wei, Wei
Liao, Zili
Liu, Yang
Liu, Fangzhou
Lin, Weidong
Xue, Yumei
Wu, Shulin
Fang, Xianhong
author_sort Wei, Hui-Qiang
collection PubMed
description Background: The feasibility and safety of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) in patients with conduction diseases following prosthetic valves (PVs) have not been well described. Methods: Permanent LBBP was attempted in patients with PVs. Procedural success and intracardiac electrical measurements were recorded at implant. Pacing threshold, complications, and echocardiographic data were assessed at implant and follow-up visit. Results: Twenty-two consecutive patients with atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances (10 with AV nodal block and 12 with infranodal block) underwent LBBP. The PVs included aortic valve replacement (AVR) in six patients, mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR) with tricuspid valve ring (TVR) in four patients, AVR with TVR in one patient, AVR with MVR plus TVR in three patients, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in five patients, and MVR alone in three patients. LBBP succeeded in 20 of 22 (90.9%) patients. LBB potential was observed in 15 of 22 (68.2%) patients, including 10 of 15 (66.7%) patients with AVR/TAVR and five of seven (71.4%) patients without AVR/TAVR. AVR and TVR served as good anatomic landmarks for facilitating the LBBP. The final sites of LBBP were 17.9 ± 1.4 mm inferior to the AVR and 23.0 ± 3.2 mm distal and septal to the TVR. The paced QRS duration was 124.5 ± 13.8 ms, while the baseline QRS duration was 120.0 ± 32.5 ms (P = 0.346). Pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude at implant were 0.60 ± 0.16 V at 0.5 ms and 11.9 ± 5.5 mV and remained stable at the mean follow-up of 16.1 ± 10.8 months. No significant exacerbation of tricuspid valve regurgitation was observed compared to baseline. Conclusion: Permanent LBBP could be feasibly and safely obtained in the majority of patients with PVs. The location of the PV might serve as a landmark for guiding the final site of the LBBP. Stable pacing parameters were observed during the follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8418204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84182042021-09-05 Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves Wei, Hui-Qiang Li, Hui Liao, Hongtao Liang, Yuanhong Zhan, Xianzhang Zhang, Qianhuan Deng, Hai Wei, Wei Liao, Zili Liu, Yang Liu, Fangzhou Lin, Weidong Xue, Yumei Wu, Shulin Fang, Xianhong Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: The feasibility and safety of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) in patients with conduction diseases following prosthetic valves (PVs) have not been well described. Methods: Permanent LBBP was attempted in patients with PVs. Procedural success and intracardiac electrical measurements were recorded at implant. Pacing threshold, complications, and echocardiographic data were assessed at implant and follow-up visit. Results: Twenty-two consecutive patients with atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances (10 with AV nodal block and 12 with infranodal block) underwent LBBP. The PVs included aortic valve replacement (AVR) in six patients, mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR) with tricuspid valve ring (TVR) in four patients, AVR with TVR in one patient, AVR with MVR plus TVR in three patients, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in five patients, and MVR alone in three patients. LBBP succeeded in 20 of 22 (90.9%) patients. LBB potential was observed in 15 of 22 (68.2%) patients, including 10 of 15 (66.7%) patients with AVR/TAVR and five of seven (71.4%) patients without AVR/TAVR. AVR and TVR served as good anatomic landmarks for facilitating the LBBP. The final sites of LBBP were 17.9 ± 1.4 mm inferior to the AVR and 23.0 ± 3.2 mm distal and septal to the TVR. The paced QRS duration was 124.5 ± 13.8 ms, while the baseline QRS duration was 120.0 ± 32.5 ms (P = 0.346). Pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude at implant were 0.60 ± 0.16 V at 0.5 ms and 11.9 ± 5.5 mV and remained stable at the mean follow-up of 16.1 ± 10.8 months. No significant exacerbation of tricuspid valve regurgitation was observed compared to baseline. Conclusion: Permanent LBBP could be feasibly and safely obtained in the majority of patients with PVs. The location of the PV might serve as a landmark for guiding the final site of the LBBP. Stable pacing parameters were observed during the follow-up. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8418204/ /pubmed/34490370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.705124 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wei, Li, Liao, Liang, Zhan, Zhang, Deng, Wei, Liao, Liu, Liu, Lin, Xue, Wu and Fang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Wei, Hui-Qiang
Li, Hui
Liao, Hongtao
Liang, Yuanhong
Zhan, Xianzhang
Zhang, Qianhuan
Deng, Hai
Wei, Wei
Liao, Zili
Liu, Yang
Liu, Fangzhou
Lin, Weidong
Xue, Yumei
Wu, Shulin
Fang, Xianhong
Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
title Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
title_full Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
title_fullStr Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
title_short Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
title_sort feasibility and safety of permanent left bundle branch pacing in patients with conduction disorders following prosthetic cardiac valves
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490370
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.705124
work_keys_str_mv AT weihuiqiang feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT lihui feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT liaohongtao feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT liangyuanhong feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT zhanxianzhang feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT zhangqianhuan feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT denghai feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT weiwei feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT liaozili feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT liuyang feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT liufangzhou feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT linweidong feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT xueyumei feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT wushulin feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves
AT fangxianhong feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves