Cargando…
Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves
Background: The feasibility and safety of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) in patients with conduction diseases following prosthetic valves (PVs) have not been well described. Methods: Permanent LBBP was attempted in patients with PVs. Procedural success and intracardiac electrical measurements were...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.705124 |
_version_ | 1783748538073612288 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Hui-Qiang Li, Hui Liao, Hongtao Liang, Yuanhong Zhan, Xianzhang Zhang, Qianhuan Deng, Hai Wei, Wei Liao, Zili Liu, Yang Liu, Fangzhou Lin, Weidong Xue, Yumei Wu, Shulin Fang, Xianhong |
author_facet | Wei, Hui-Qiang Li, Hui Liao, Hongtao Liang, Yuanhong Zhan, Xianzhang Zhang, Qianhuan Deng, Hai Wei, Wei Liao, Zili Liu, Yang Liu, Fangzhou Lin, Weidong Xue, Yumei Wu, Shulin Fang, Xianhong |
author_sort | Wei, Hui-Qiang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: The feasibility and safety of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) in patients with conduction diseases following prosthetic valves (PVs) have not been well described. Methods: Permanent LBBP was attempted in patients with PVs. Procedural success and intracardiac electrical measurements were recorded at implant. Pacing threshold, complications, and echocardiographic data were assessed at implant and follow-up visit. Results: Twenty-two consecutive patients with atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances (10 with AV nodal block and 12 with infranodal block) underwent LBBP. The PVs included aortic valve replacement (AVR) in six patients, mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR) with tricuspid valve ring (TVR) in four patients, AVR with TVR in one patient, AVR with MVR plus TVR in three patients, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in five patients, and MVR alone in three patients. LBBP succeeded in 20 of 22 (90.9%) patients. LBB potential was observed in 15 of 22 (68.2%) patients, including 10 of 15 (66.7%) patients with AVR/TAVR and five of seven (71.4%) patients without AVR/TAVR. AVR and TVR served as good anatomic landmarks for facilitating the LBBP. The final sites of LBBP were 17.9 ± 1.4 mm inferior to the AVR and 23.0 ± 3.2 mm distal and septal to the TVR. The paced QRS duration was 124.5 ± 13.8 ms, while the baseline QRS duration was 120.0 ± 32.5 ms (P = 0.346). Pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude at implant were 0.60 ± 0.16 V at 0.5 ms and 11.9 ± 5.5 mV and remained stable at the mean follow-up of 16.1 ± 10.8 months. No significant exacerbation of tricuspid valve regurgitation was observed compared to baseline. Conclusion: Permanent LBBP could be feasibly and safely obtained in the majority of patients with PVs. The location of the PV might serve as a landmark for guiding the final site of the LBBP. Stable pacing parameters were observed during the follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8418204 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84182042021-09-05 Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves Wei, Hui-Qiang Li, Hui Liao, Hongtao Liang, Yuanhong Zhan, Xianzhang Zhang, Qianhuan Deng, Hai Wei, Wei Liao, Zili Liu, Yang Liu, Fangzhou Lin, Weidong Xue, Yumei Wu, Shulin Fang, Xianhong Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine Background: The feasibility and safety of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) in patients with conduction diseases following prosthetic valves (PVs) have not been well described. Methods: Permanent LBBP was attempted in patients with PVs. Procedural success and intracardiac electrical measurements were recorded at implant. Pacing threshold, complications, and echocardiographic data were assessed at implant and follow-up visit. Results: Twenty-two consecutive patients with atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances (10 with AV nodal block and 12 with infranodal block) underwent LBBP. The PVs included aortic valve replacement (AVR) in six patients, mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR) with tricuspid valve ring (TVR) in four patients, AVR with TVR in one patient, AVR with MVR plus TVR in three patients, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in five patients, and MVR alone in three patients. LBBP succeeded in 20 of 22 (90.9%) patients. LBB potential was observed in 15 of 22 (68.2%) patients, including 10 of 15 (66.7%) patients with AVR/TAVR and five of seven (71.4%) patients without AVR/TAVR. AVR and TVR served as good anatomic landmarks for facilitating the LBBP. The final sites of LBBP were 17.9 ± 1.4 mm inferior to the AVR and 23.0 ± 3.2 mm distal and septal to the TVR. The paced QRS duration was 124.5 ± 13.8 ms, while the baseline QRS duration was 120.0 ± 32.5 ms (P = 0.346). Pacing threshold and R-wave amplitude at implant were 0.60 ± 0.16 V at 0.5 ms and 11.9 ± 5.5 mV and remained stable at the mean follow-up of 16.1 ± 10.8 months. No significant exacerbation of tricuspid valve regurgitation was observed compared to baseline. Conclusion: Permanent LBBP could be feasibly and safely obtained in the majority of patients with PVs. The location of the PV might serve as a landmark for guiding the final site of the LBBP. Stable pacing parameters were observed during the follow-up. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8418204/ /pubmed/34490370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.705124 Text en Copyright © 2021 Wei, Li, Liao, Liang, Zhan, Zhang, Deng, Wei, Liao, Liu, Liu, Lin, Xue, Wu and Fang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Wei, Hui-Qiang Li, Hui Liao, Hongtao Liang, Yuanhong Zhan, Xianzhang Zhang, Qianhuan Deng, Hai Wei, Wei Liao, Zili Liu, Yang Liu, Fangzhou Lin, Weidong Xue, Yumei Wu, Shulin Fang, Xianhong Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves |
title | Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves |
title_full | Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves |
title_short | Feasibility and Safety of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Patients With Conduction Disorders Following Prosthetic Cardiac Valves |
title_sort | feasibility and safety of permanent left bundle branch pacing in patients with conduction disorders following prosthetic cardiac valves |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418204/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490370 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.705124 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weihuiqiang feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT lihui feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT liaohongtao feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT liangyuanhong feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT zhanxianzhang feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT zhangqianhuan feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT denghai feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT weiwei feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT liaozili feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT liuyang feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT liufangzhou feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT linweidong feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT xueyumei feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT wushulin feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves AT fangxianhong feasibilityandsafetyofpermanentleftbundlebranchpacinginpatientswithconductiondisordersfollowingprostheticcardiacvalves |