Cargando…

Cross‐platform comparison of next‐generation sequencing and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for detecting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations in cfDNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND: Examining tumor KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is essential for treatment selection and prognosis evaluation. Cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma is a feasible source for tumor gene analysis. METHODS: In this study, we recruited mCRC patients and analyzed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Xiaojing, Huang, Fei, Cao, Minlu, Chen, Xinning, Wang, Hao, Jiang, Huiqin, Yu, Yiyi, Shen, Minna, Yang, Yihui, Wang, Beili, Liu, Tianshu, Guo, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23818
_version_ 1783748578058960896
author Xu, Xiaojing
Huang, Fei
Cao, Minlu
Chen, Xinning
Wang, Hao
Jiang, Huiqin
Yu, Yiyi
Shen, Minna
Yang, Yihui
Wang, Beili
Liu, Tianshu
Guo, Wei
author_facet Xu, Xiaojing
Huang, Fei
Cao, Minlu
Chen, Xinning
Wang, Hao
Jiang, Huiqin
Yu, Yiyi
Shen, Minna
Yang, Yihui
Wang, Beili
Liu, Tianshu
Guo, Wei
author_sort Xu, Xiaojing
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Examining tumor KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is essential for treatment selection and prognosis evaluation. Cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma is a feasible source for tumor gene analysis. METHODS: In this study, we recruited mCRC patients and analyzed their KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA status in cfDNA using two platforms, next‐generation sequencing (NGS) and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF). The performance between the two platforms and the concordance rate between cfDNA and tissue were analyzed. The relationship between cfDNA‐related variables and clinical variables was also assessed. Tumor mutations in cfDNA from patients receiving continuous treatments were monitored in the follow‐ups. RESULTS: Next‐generation sequencing and MALDI‐TOF had similar specificity (100.0% vs. 99.3%) and negative predictive value (99.9% vs. 99.4%), whereas NGS had higher sensitivity (97.1% vs. 85.3% of MALDI‐TOF) and positive predictive value (100% vs. 82.9% of MALDI‐TOF). The overall concordance rate of NGS and MALDI‐TOF was 98.6%. For the reportable types of mutations in both cfDNA and tissue, the concordance rate was 96.1%. Among 28 tissue‐positive patients, the allele frequencies of tumor mutations in cfDNA were higher in patients with primary tumor burden (p = 0.0141). Both CEA and CA 19‐9 were positively correlated with cfDNA concentration (r = 0.3278 and r = 0.3992). The allele frequencies of tumor mutations changed with disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Next‐generation sequencing showed slightly better performance in detecting cfDNA mutations and was more suitable for clinical practice. cfDNA‐related variables reflected the tumor status and showed a promising potential in monitoring disease progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8418479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84184792021-09-08 Cross‐platform comparison of next‐generation sequencing and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for detecting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations in cfDNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients Xu, Xiaojing Huang, Fei Cao, Minlu Chen, Xinning Wang, Hao Jiang, Huiqin Yu, Yiyi Shen, Minna Yang, Yihui Wang, Beili Liu, Tianshu Guo, Wei J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Examining tumor KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA status in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is essential for treatment selection and prognosis evaluation. Cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) in plasma is a feasible source for tumor gene analysis. METHODS: In this study, we recruited mCRC patients and analyzed their KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA status in cfDNA using two platforms, next‐generation sequencing (NGS) and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF). The performance between the two platforms and the concordance rate between cfDNA and tissue were analyzed. The relationship between cfDNA‐related variables and clinical variables was also assessed. Tumor mutations in cfDNA from patients receiving continuous treatments were monitored in the follow‐ups. RESULTS: Next‐generation sequencing and MALDI‐TOF had similar specificity (100.0% vs. 99.3%) and negative predictive value (99.9% vs. 99.4%), whereas NGS had higher sensitivity (97.1% vs. 85.3% of MALDI‐TOF) and positive predictive value (100% vs. 82.9% of MALDI‐TOF). The overall concordance rate of NGS and MALDI‐TOF was 98.6%. For the reportable types of mutations in both cfDNA and tissue, the concordance rate was 96.1%. Among 28 tissue‐positive patients, the allele frequencies of tumor mutations in cfDNA were higher in patients with primary tumor burden (p = 0.0141). Both CEA and CA 19‐9 were positively correlated with cfDNA concentration (r = 0.3278 and r = 0.3992). The allele frequencies of tumor mutations changed with disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: Next‐generation sequencing showed slightly better performance in detecting cfDNA mutations and was more suitable for clinical practice. cfDNA‐related variables reflected the tumor status and showed a promising potential in monitoring disease progression. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8418479/ /pubmed/34403504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23818 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Xu, Xiaojing
Huang, Fei
Cao, Minlu
Chen, Xinning
Wang, Hao
Jiang, Huiqin
Yu, Yiyi
Shen, Minna
Yang, Yihui
Wang, Beili
Liu, Tianshu
Guo, Wei
Cross‐platform comparison of next‐generation sequencing and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for detecting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations in cfDNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients
title Cross‐platform comparison of next‐generation sequencing and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for detecting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations in cfDNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients
title_full Cross‐platform comparison of next‐generation sequencing and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for detecting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations in cfDNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients
title_fullStr Cross‐platform comparison of next‐generation sequencing and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for detecting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations in cfDNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients
title_full_unstemmed Cross‐platform comparison of next‐generation sequencing and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for detecting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations in cfDNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients
title_short Cross‐platform comparison of next‐generation sequencing and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for detecting KRAS/NRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutations in cfDNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients
title_sort cross‐platform comparison of next‐generation sequencing and matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry for detecting kras/nras/braf/pik3ca mutations in cfdna from metastatic colorectal cancer patients
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23818
work_keys_str_mv AT xuxiaojing crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT huangfei crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT caominlu crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT chenxinning crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT wanghao crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT jianghuiqin crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT yuyiyi crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT shenminna crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT yangyihui crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT wangbeili crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT liutianshu crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients
AT guowei crossplatformcomparisonofnextgenerationsequencingandmatrixassistedlaserdesorptionionizationtimeofflightmassspectrometryfordetectingkrasnrasbrafpik3camutationsincfdnafrommetastaticcolorectalcancerpatients