Cargando…

Diagnostic value of red blood cell distribution width, platelet distribution width, and red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio in children with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether red blood cell distribution width (RDW), platelet distribution width (PDW), and red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio (RPR) can serve as biomarkers to distinguish hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) from sepsis in children. METHODS: This is a ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xi, Ya, Bai, Yongying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34273201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23909
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To investigate whether red blood cell distribution width (RDW), platelet distribution width (PDW), and red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio (RPR) can serve as biomarkers to distinguish hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) from sepsis in children. METHODS: This is a retrospective study, involving 71 HLH patients, 105 sepsis patients, and 88 normal controls from January 2018 to December 2019. RDW, PDW, and RPR values were obtained from peripheral blood samples before standard treatment. The clinical differential diagnostic values of RDW, PDW, and RPR were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In addition, peripheral blood samples after treatment from HLH patients were also collected for the same analyses. RESULTS: RDW, PDW, and RPR levels of the HLH patients were significantly higher than those of sepsis and normal controls (p < 0.001). In ROC curve analysis of the RDW, PDW, and RPR for diagnosis of HLH, the area under the curve (AUC) could reach to 0.7799 (95% CI = 0.7113–0.8486), 0.7835 (95% CI = 0.7093–0.8577), and 0.9268 (95% CI = 0.8886–0.9649), respectively. When using the criteria of RDW >13.75, PDW >13.30, and RPR >0.08, the sensitivity was 76.06%, 67.61%, and 84.51%, while the specificity was 68.57%, 85.71%, and 87.62%, respectively. After treatment of HLH patients, PDW and RPR were significantly reduced (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that RDW, PDW, and RPR, which can be easily and cheaply detected, are novel indicators for differential diagnosis of HLH. PDW and RPR are useful indices for monitoring the effects of treatment on HLH.