Cargando…
Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines?
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been the standard of care for clinically node-negative women with invasive breast cancer (IBC); however, there is less agreement on whether to perform SLNB when the risk of metastasis is low or when it does not affect survival or locoregional control...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34304312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10443-x |
_version_ | 1783748596356612096 |
---|---|
author | Armani, Ava Douglas, Sasha Kulkarni, Swati Wallace, Anne Blair, Sarah |
author_facet | Armani, Ava Douglas, Sasha Kulkarni, Swati Wallace, Anne Blair, Sarah |
author_sort | Armani, Ava |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been the standard of care for clinically node-negative women with invasive breast cancer (IBC); however, there is less agreement on whether to perform SLNB when the risk of metastasis is low or when it does not affect survival or locoregional control. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved survey was sent to members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons asking in which scenarios surgeons would recommend SLNB. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: There was a 23% response rate; 68% identified as breast surgical oncologists, 6% as surgical oncologists, 24% as general surgeons, and 2% as other. The majority practiced in a community setting (71%) versus an academic setting (29%). In a healthy female with clinical T1N0 hormone receptor-positive (HR+) IBC, 83% favored SLNB if the patient was 75 years of age, versus 35% if the patient was 85 years of age. Academic surgeons were less likely to perform axillary staging in a healthy 75-year-old (odds ratio [OR] 0.51 [0.32–0.80], p = 0.004) or a healthy 85-year-old (OR 0.48 [0.31–0.74], p = 0.001). For DCIS, 32% endorsed SLNB in women undergoing lumpectomy, with breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons being less likely to endorse this procedure (OR 0.54 [0.36–0.82], p = 0.028; and OR 0.53 [0.34–0.83], p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite studies showing that omitting SLNB in older patients with HR+ IBC does not impact regional control or survival, most surgeons are still opting for axillary staging. In addition, one in three are performing SLNB for lumpectomies for DCIS. Breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons were more likely to be practicing based on recent data and guidelines. Practice patterns are changing but there is still room for improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10443-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8418590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84185902021-09-22 Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines? Armani, Ava Douglas, Sasha Kulkarni, Swati Wallace, Anne Blair, Sarah Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been the standard of care for clinically node-negative women with invasive breast cancer (IBC); however, there is less agreement on whether to perform SLNB when the risk of metastasis is low or when it does not affect survival or locoregional control. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved survey was sent to members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons asking in which scenarios surgeons would recommend SLNB. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: There was a 23% response rate; 68% identified as breast surgical oncologists, 6% as surgical oncologists, 24% as general surgeons, and 2% as other. The majority practiced in a community setting (71%) versus an academic setting (29%). In a healthy female with clinical T1N0 hormone receptor-positive (HR+) IBC, 83% favored SLNB if the patient was 75 years of age, versus 35% if the patient was 85 years of age. Academic surgeons were less likely to perform axillary staging in a healthy 75-year-old (odds ratio [OR] 0.51 [0.32–0.80], p = 0.004) or a healthy 85-year-old (OR 0.48 [0.31–0.74], p = 0.001). For DCIS, 32% endorsed SLNB in women undergoing lumpectomy, with breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons being less likely to endorse this procedure (OR 0.54 [0.36–0.82], p = 0.028; and OR 0.53 [0.34–0.83], p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite studies showing that omitting SLNB in older patients with HR+ IBC does not impact regional control or survival, most surgeons are still opting for axillary staging. In addition, one in three are performing SLNB for lumpectomies for DCIS. Breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons were more likely to be practicing based on recent data and guidelines. Practice patterns are changing but there is still room for improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10443-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8418590/ /pubmed/34304312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10443-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Breast Oncology Armani, Ava Douglas, Sasha Kulkarni, Swati Wallace, Anne Blair, Sarah Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines? |
title | Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines? |
title_full | Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines? |
title_fullStr | Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines? |
title_full_unstemmed | Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines? |
title_short | Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines? |
title_sort | controversial areas in axillary staging: are we following the guidelines? |
topic | Breast Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34304312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10443-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT armaniava controversialareasinaxillarystagingarewefollowingtheguidelines AT douglassasha controversialareasinaxillarystagingarewefollowingtheguidelines AT kulkarniswati controversialareasinaxillarystagingarewefollowingtheguidelines AT wallaceanne controversialareasinaxillarystagingarewefollowingtheguidelines AT blairsarah controversialareasinaxillarystagingarewefollowingtheguidelines |