Cargando…

Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines?

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been the standard of care for clinically node-negative women with invasive breast cancer (IBC); however, there is less agreement on whether to perform SLNB when the risk of metastasis is low or when it does not affect survival or locoregional control...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armani, Ava, Douglas, Sasha, Kulkarni, Swati, Wallace, Anne, Blair, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34304312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10443-x
_version_ 1783748596356612096
author Armani, Ava
Douglas, Sasha
Kulkarni, Swati
Wallace, Anne
Blair, Sarah
author_facet Armani, Ava
Douglas, Sasha
Kulkarni, Swati
Wallace, Anne
Blair, Sarah
author_sort Armani, Ava
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been the standard of care for clinically node-negative women with invasive breast cancer (IBC); however, there is less agreement on whether to perform SLNB when the risk of metastasis is low or when it does not affect survival or locoregional control. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved survey was sent to members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons asking in which scenarios surgeons would recommend SLNB. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: There was a 23% response rate; 68% identified as breast surgical oncologists, 6% as surgical oncologists, 24% as general surgeons, and 2% as other. The majority practiced in a community setting (71%) versus an academic setting (29%). In a healthy female with clinical T1N0 hormone receptor-positive (HR+) IBC, 83% favored SLNB if the patient was 75 years of age, versus 35% if the patient was 85 years of age. Academic surgeons were less likely to perform axillary staging in a healthy 75-year-old (odds ratio [OR] 0.51 [0.32–0.80], p = 0.004) or a healthy 85-year-old (OR 0.48 [0.31–0.74], p = 0.001). For DCIS, 32% endorsed SLNB in women undergoing lumpectomy, with breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons being less likely to endorse this procedure (OR 0.54 [0.36–0.82], p = 0.028; and OR 0.53 [0.34–0.83], p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite studies showing that omitting SLNB in older patients with HR+ IBC does not impact regional control or survival, most surgeons are still opting for axillary staging. In addition, one in three are performing SLNB for lumpectomies for DCIS. Breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons were more likely to be practicing based on recent data and guidelines. Practice patterns are changing but there is still room for improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10443-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8418590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84185902021-09-22 Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines? Armani, Ava Douglas, Sasha Kulkarni, Swati Wallace, Anne Blair, Sarah Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been the standard of care for clinically node-negative women with invasive breast cancer (IBC); however, there is less agreement on whether to perform SLNB when the risk of metastasis is low or when it does not affect survival or locoregional control. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved survey was sent to members of the American Society of Breast Surgeons asking in which scenarios surgeons would recommend SLNB. Descriptive statistics and multivariable analysis were performed using SPSS software. RESULTS: There was a 23% response rate; 68% identified as breast surgical oncologists, 6% as surgical oncologists, 24% as general surgeons, and 2% as other. The majority practiced in a community setting (71%) versus an academic setting (29%). In a healthy female with clinical T1N0 hormone receptor-positive (HR+) IBC, 83% favored SLNB if the patient was 75 years of age, versus 35% if the patient was 85 years of age. Academic surgeons were less likely to perform axillary staging in a healthy 75-year-old (odds ratio [OR] 0.51 [0.32–0.80], p = 0.004) or a healthy 85-year-old (OR 0.48 [0.31–0.74], p = 0.001). For DCIS, 32% endorsed SLNB in women undergoing lumpectomy, with breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons being less likely to endorse this procedure (OR 0.54 [0.36–0.82], p = 0.028; and OR 0.53 [0.34–0.83], p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Despite studies showing that omitting SLNB in older patients with HR+ IBC does not impact regional control or survival, most surgeons are still opting for axillary staging. In addition, one in three are performing SLNB for lumpectomies for DCIS. Breast surgical oncologists and academic surgeons were more likely to be practicing based on recent data and guidelines. Practice patterns are changing but there is still room for improvement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-10443-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-24 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8418590/ /pubmed/34304312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10443-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Armani, Ava
Douglas, Sasha
Kulkarni, Swati
Wallace, Anne
Blair, Sarah
Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines?
title Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines?
title_full Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines?
title_fullStr Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines?
title_full_unstemmed Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines?
title_short Controversial Areas in Axillary Staging: Are We Following the Guidelines?
title_sort controversial areas in axillary staging: are we following the guidelines?
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34304312
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10443-x
work_keys_str_mv AT armaniava controversialareasinaxillarystagingarewefollowingtheguidelines
AT douglassasha controversialareasinaxillarystagingarewefollowingtheguidelines
AT kulkarniswati controversialareasinaxillarystagingarewefollowingtheguidelines
AT wallaceanne controversialareasinaxillarystagingarewefollowingtheguidelines
AT blairsarah controversialareasinaxillarystagingarewefollowingtheguidelines