Cargando…

Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes causes cardio-renal complications and is treated with different combination therapies. The renal hemodynamics profile of such combination therapies has not been evaluated in detail. METHODS: Patients (N = 97) with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either empaglif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ott, Christian, Jung, Susanne, Korn, Manuel, Kannenkeril, Dennis, Bosch, Agnes, Kolwelter, Julie, Striepe, Kristina, Bramlage, Peter, Schiffer, Mario, Schmieder, Roland E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34481498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01358-8
_version_ 1783748625445158912
author Ott, Christian
Jung, Susanne
Korn, Manuel
Kannenkeril, Dennis
Bosch, Agnes
Kolwelter, Julie
Striepe, Kristina
Bramlage, Peter
Schiffer, Mario
Schmieder, Roland E.
author_facet Ott, Christian
Jung, Susanne
Korn, Manuel
Kannenkeril, Dennis
Bosch, Agnes
Kolwelter, Julie
Striepe, Kristina
Bramlage, Peter
Schiffer, Mario
Schmieder, Roland E.
author_sort Ott, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes causes cardio-renal complications and is treated with different combination therapies. The renal hemodynamics profile of such combination therapies has not been evaluated in detail. METHODS: Patients (N = 97) with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either empagliflozin and linagliptin (E+L group) or metformin and insulin glargine (M+I group) for 3 months. Renal hemodynamics were assessed with para-aminohippuric acid and inulin for renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Intraglomerular hemodynamics were calculated according the Gomez´ model. RESULTS: Treatment with E+L reduced GFR (p = 0.003), but RPF remained unchanged (p = 0.536). In contrast, M+I not only reduced GFR (p = 0.001), but also resulted in a significant reduction of RPF (p < 0.001). Renal vascular resistance (RVR) decreased with E+L treatment (p = 0.001) but increased with M+I treatment (p = 0.001). The changes in RPF and RVR were different between the two groups (both p(adjust) < 0.001). Analysis of intraglomerular hemodynamics revealed that E+L did not change resistance of afferent arteriole (R(A)) (p = 0.116), but diminished resistance of efferent arterioles (R(E)) (p = 0.001). In M+I group R(A) was increased (p = 0.006) and R(E) remained unchanged (p = 0.538). The effects on R(A) (p(adjust) < 0.05) and on R(E) (p(adjust) < 0.05) differed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved renal function treatment with M+I resulted in reduction of renal perfusion and increase in vascular resistance, in contrast to treatment with E+I that preserved renal perfusion and reduced vascular resistance. Moreover, different underlying effects on the resistance vessels have been estimated according to the Gomez model, with M+I increasing R(A) and E+L predominantly decreasing R(E), which is in contrast to the proposed sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor effects. Trial registration: The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02752113) on April 26, 2016
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8418746
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84187462021-09-09 Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine Ott, Christian Jung, Susanne Korn, Manuel Kannenkeril, Dennis Bosch, Agnes Kolwelter, Julie Striepe, Kristina Bramlage, Peter Schiffer, Mario Schmieder, Roland E. Cardiovasc Diabetol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes causes cardio-renal complications and is treated with different combination therapies. The renal hemodynamics profile of such combination therapies has not been evaluated in detail. METHODS: Patients (N = 97) with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either empagliflozin and linagliptin (E+L group) or metformin and insulin glargine (M+I group) for 3 months. Renal hemodynamics were assessed with para-aminohippuric acid and inulin for renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Intraglomerular hemodynamics were calculated according the Gomez´ model. RESULTS: Treatment with E+L reduced GFR (p = 0.003), but RPF remained unchanged (p = 0.536). In contrast, M+I not only reduced GFR (p = 0.001), but also resulted in a significant reduction of RPF (p < 0.001). Renal vascular resistance (RVR) decreased with E+L treatment (p = 0.001) but increased with M+I treatment (p = 0.001). The changes in RPF and RVR were different between the two groups (both p(adjust) < 0.001). Analysis of intraglomerular hemodynamics revealed that E+L did not change resistance of afferent arteriole (R(A)) (p = 0.116), but diminished resistance of efferent arterioles (R(E)) (p = 0.001). In M+I group R(A) was increased (p = 0.006) and R(E) remained unchanged (p = 0.538). The effects on R(A) (p(adjust) < 0.05) and on R(E) (p(adjust) < 0.05) differed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved renal function treatment with M+I resulted in reduction of renal perfusion and increase in vascular resistance, in contrast to treatment with E+I that preserved renal perfusion and reduced vascular resistance. Moreover, different underlying effects on the resistance vessels have been estimated according to the Gomez model, with M+I increasing R(A) and E+L predominantly decreasing R(E), which is in contrast to the proposed sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor effects. Trial registration: The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02752113) on April 26, 2016 BioMed Central 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8418746/ /pubmed/34481498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01358-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Ott, Christian
Jung, Susanne
Korn, Manuel
Kannenkeril, Dennis
Bosch, Agnes
Kolwelter, Julie
Striepe, Kristina
Bramlage, Peter
Schiffer, Mario
Schmieder, Roland E.
Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine
title Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine
title_full Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine
title_fullStr Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine
title_full_unstemmed Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine
title_short Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine
title_sort renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418746/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34481498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01358-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ottchristian renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine
AT jungsusanne renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine
AT kornmanuel renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine
AT kannenkerildennis renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine
AT boschagnes renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine
AT kolwelterjulie renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine
AT striepekristina renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine
AT bramlagepeter renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine
AT schiffermario renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine
AT schmiederrolande renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine