Cargando…
Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes causes cardio-renal complications and is treated with different combination therapies. The renal hemodynamics profile of such combination therapies has not been evaluated in detail. METHODS: Patients (N = 97) with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either empaglif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34481498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01358-8 |
_version_ | 1783748625445158912 |
---|---|
author | Ott, Christian Jung, Susanne Korn, Manuel Kannenkeril, Dennis Bosch, Agnes Kolwelter, Julie Striepe, Kristina Bramlage, Peter Schiffer, Mario Schmieder, Roland E. |
author_facet | Ott, Christian Jung, Susanne Korn, Manuel Kannenkeril, Dennis Bosch, Agnes Kolwelter, Julie Striepe, Kristina Bramlage, Peter Schiffer, Mario Schmieder, Roland E. |
author_sort | Ott, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes causes cardio-renal complications and is treated with different combination therapies. The renal hemodynamics profile of such combination therapies has not been evaluated in detail. METHODS: Patients (N = 97) with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either empagliflozin and linagliptin (E+L group) or metformin and insulin glargine (M+I group) for 3 months. Renal hemodynamics were assessed with para-aminohippuric acid and inulin for renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Intraglomerular hemodynamics were calculated according the Gomez´ model. RESULTS: Treatment with E+L reduced GFR (p = 0.003), but RPF remained unchanged (p = 0.536). In contrast, M+I not only reduced GFR (p = 0.001), but also resulted in a significant reduction of RPF (p < 0.001). Renal vascular resistance (RVR) decreased with E+L treatment (p = 0.001) but increased with M+I treatment (p = 0.001). The changes in RPF and RVR were different between the two groups (both p(adjust) < 0.001). Analysis of intraglomerular hemodynamics revealed that E+L did not change resistance of afferent arteriole (R(A)) (p = 0.116), but diminished resistance of efferent arterioles (R(E)) (p = 0.001). In M+I group R(A) was increased (p = 0.006) and R(E) remained unchanged (p = 0.538). The effects on R(A) (p(adjust) < 0.05) and on R(E) (p(adjust) < 0.05) differed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved renal function treatment with M+I resulted in reduction of renal perfusion and increase in vascular resistance, in contrast to treatment with E+I that preserved renal perfusion and reduced vascular resistance. Moreover, different underlying effects on the resistance vessels have been estimated according to the Gomez model, with M+I increasing R(A) and E+L predominantly decreasing R(E), which is in contrast to the proposed sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor effects. Trial registration: The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02752113) on April 26, 2016 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8418746 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84187462021-09-09 Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine Ott, Christian Jung, Susanne Korn, Manuel Kannenkeril, Dennis Bosch, Agnes Kolwelter, Julie Striepe, Kristina Bramlage, Peter Schiffer, Mario Schmieder, Roland E. Cardiovasc Diabetol Original Investigation BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes causes cardio-renal complications and is treated with different combination therapies. The renal hemodynamics profile of such combination therapies has not been evaluated in detail. METHODS: Patients (N = 97) with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either empagliflozin and linagliptin (E+L group) or metformin and insulin glargine (M+I group) for 3 months. Renal hemodynamics were assessed with para-aminohippuric acid and inulin for renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Intraglomerular hemodynamics were calculated according the Gomez´ model. RESULTS: Treatment with E+L reduced GFR (p = 0.003), but RPF remained unchanged (p = 0.536). In contrast, M+I not only reduced GFR (p = 0.001), but also resulted in a significant reduction of RPF (p < 0.001). Renal vascular resistance (RVR) decreased with E+L treatment (p = 0.001) but increased with M+I treatment (p = 0.001). The changes in RPF and RVR were different between the two groups (both p(adjust) < 0.001). Analysis of intraglomerular hemodynamics revealed that E+L did not change resistance of afferent arteriole (R(A)) (p = 0.116), but diminished resistance of efferent arterioles (R(E)) (p = 0.001). In M+I group R(A) was increased (p = 0.006) and R(E) remained unchanged (p = 0.538). The effects on R(A) (p(adjust) < 0.05) and on R(E) (p(adjust) < 0.05) differed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved renal function treatment with M+I resulted in reduction of renal perfusion and increase in vascular resistance, in contrast to treatment with E+I that preserved renal perfusion and reduced vascular resistance. Moreover, different underlying effects on the resistance vessels have been estimated according to the Gomez model, with M+I increasing R(A) and E+L predominantly decreasing R(E), which is in contrast to the proposed sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor effects. Trial registration: The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02752113) on April 26, 2016 BioMed Central 2021-09-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8418746/ /pubmed/34481498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01358-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Ott, Christian Jung, Susanne Korn, Manuel Kannenkeril, Dennis Bosch, Agnes Kolwelter, Julie Striepe, Kristina Bramlage, Peter Schiffer, Mario Schmieder, Roland E. Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine |
title | Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine |
title_full | Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine |
title_fullStr | Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine |
title_full_unstemmed | Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine |
title_short | Renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine |
title_sort | renal hemodynamic effects differ between antidiabetic combination strategies: randomized controlled clinical trial comparing empagliflozin/linagliptin with metformin/insulin glargine |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8418746/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34481498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01358-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ottchristian renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine AT jungsusanne renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine AT kornmanuel renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine AT kannenkerildennis renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine AT boschagnes renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine AT kolwelterjulie renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine AT striepekristina renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine AT bramlagepeter renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine AT schiffermario renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine AT schmiederrolande renalhemodynamiceffectsdifferbetweenantidiabeticcombinationstrategiesrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrialcomparingempagliflozinlinagliptinwithmetformininsulinglargine |