Cargando…

Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: The introduction of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colon cancer has raised an important discussion in relation to the extent of colic and mesenteric resection, and the impact this may have on lymph node yield. As uncertainty remains regarding the usefulness of and indication...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anania, G., Davies, R. J., Bagolini, F., Vettoretto, N., Randolph, J., Cirocchi, R., Donini, A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34120270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02471-2
_version_ 1783748686496399360
author Anania, G.
Davies, R. J.
Bagolini, F.
Vettoretto, N.
Randolph, J.
Cirocchi, R.
Donini, A.
author_facet Anania, G.
Davies, R. J.
Bagolini, F.
Vettoretto, N.
Randolph, J.
Cirocchi, R.
Donini, A.
author_sort Anania, G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The introduction of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colon cancer has raised an important discussion in relation to the extent of colic and mesenteric resection, and the impact this may have on lymph node yield. As uncertainty remains regarding the usefulness of and indications for right hemicolectomy with CME and the benefits of CME compared with a traditional approach, the purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the two procedures in terms of safety, lymph node yield and oncological outcome. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature from 2009 up to March 15th, 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two hundred eighty-one publications were evaluated, and 17 met the inclusion criteria and were included. Primary endpoints analysed were anastomotic leak rate, blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, 3- and 5-year oncologic outcomes. Secondary outcomes were operating time, conversion, intraoperative complications, reoperation rate, overall and Clavien–Dindo grade 3–4 postoperative complications. RESULTS: In terms of safety, right hemicolectomy with CME is not inferior to the standard procedure when comparing rates of anastomotic leak (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.38–1.79), blood loss (MD −32.48, 95% CI −98.54 to −33.58), overall postoperative complications (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67–1.00), Clavien–Dindo grade III–IV postoperative complications (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.82–2.28) and reoperation rate (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.26–1.75). Traditional surgery is associated with a shorter operating time (MD 16.43, 95% CI 4.27–28.60) and lower conversion from laparoscopic to open approach (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.00–2.96). In terms of oncologic outcomes, right hemicolectomy with CME leads to a higher lymph node yield than traditional surgery (MD 7.05, 95% CI 4.06–10.04). Results of statistical analysis comparing 3-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival were better in the CME group, RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.27–0.66 and RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17–0.56, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Right hemicolectomy with CME is not inferior to traditional surgery in terms of safety and has a greater lymph node yield when compared with traditional surgery. Moreover, right-sided CME is associated with better overall and disease-free survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8419145
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84191452021-09-22 Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis Anania, G. Davies, R. J. Bagolini, F. Vettoretto, N. Randolph, J. Cirocchi, R. Donini, A. Tech Coloproctol Review BACKGROUND: The introduction of complete mesocolic excision (CME) for right colon cancer has raised an important discussion in relation to the extent of colic and mesenteric resection, and the impact this may have on lymph node yield. As uncertainty remains regarding the usefulness of and indications for right hemicolectomy with CME and the benefits of CME compared with a traditional approach, the purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the two procedures in terms of safety, lymph node yield and oncological outcome. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature from 2009 up to March 15th, 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two hundred eighty-one publications were evaluated, and 17 met the inclusion criteria and were included. Primary endpoints analysed were anastomotic leak rate, blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, 3- and 5-year oncologic outcomes. Secondary outcomes were operating time, conversion, intraoperative complications, reoperation rate, overall and Clavien–Dindo grade 3–4 postoperative complications. RESULTS: In terms of safety, right hemicolectomy with CME is not inferior to the standard procedure when comparing rates of anastomotic leak (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.38–1.79), blood loss (MD −32.48, 95% CI −98.54 to −33.58), overall postoperative complications (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67–1.00), Clavien–Dindo grade III–IV postoperative complications (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.82–2.28) and reoperation rate (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.26–1.75). Traditional surgery is associated with a shorter operating time (MD 16.43, 95% CI 4.27–28.60) and lower conversion from laparoscopic to open approach (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.00–2.96). In terms of oncologic outcomes, right hemicolectomy with CME leads to a higher lymph node yield than traditional surgery (MD 7.05, 95% CI 4.06–10.04). Results of statistical analysis comparing 3-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival were better in the CME group, RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.27–0.66 and RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17–0.56, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Right hemicolectomy with CME is not inferior to traditional surgery in terms of safety and has a greater lymph node yield when compared with traditional surgery. Moreover, right-sided CME is associated with better overall and disease-free survival. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8419145/ /pubmed/34120270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02471-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Anania, G.
Davies, R. J.
Bagolini, F.
Vettoretto, N.
Randolph, J.
Cirocchi, R.
Donini, A.
Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision is safe, leads to an increased lymph node yield and to increased survival: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419145/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34120270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-021-02471-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ananiag righthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcisionissafeleadstoanincreasedlymphnodeyieldandtoincreasedsurvivalresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT daviesrj righthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcisionissafeleadstoanincreasedlymphnodeyieldandtoincreasedsurvivalresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bagolinif righthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcisionissafeleadstoanincreasedlymphnodeyieldandtoincreasedsurvivalresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vettoretton righthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcisionissafeleadstoanincreasedlymphnodeyieldandtoincreasedsurvivalresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT randolphj righthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcisionissafeleadstoanincreasedlymphnodeyieldandtoincreasedsurvivalresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cirocchir righthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcisionissafeleadstoanincreasedlymphnodeyieldandtoincreasedsurvivalresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT doninia righthemicolectomywithcompletemesocolicexcisionissafeleadstoanincreasedlymphnodeyieldandtoincreasedsurvivalresultsofasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis