Cargando…

Robot-Assisted Gait Training Plan for Patients in Poststroke Recovery Period: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Walking dysfunction exists in most patients after stroke. Evidence regarding gait training in two weeks is scarce in resource-limited settings; this study was conducted to investigate the effects of a short-term robot-assisted gait training plan for patients with stroke. METHODS: 85 pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Deng, Yang, Zhang, Lei, Liu, Chaoming, Ni, Ming, Wu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5820304
_version_ 1783748765348265984
author Yu, Deng
Yang, Zhang
Lei, Liu
Chaoming, Ni
Ming, Wu
author_facet Yu, Deng
Yang, Zhang
Lei, Liu
Chaoming, Ni
Ming, Wu
author_sort Yu, Deng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Walking dysfunction exists in most patients after stroke. Evidence regarding gait training in two weeks is scarce in resource-limited settings; this study was conducted to investigate the effects of a short-term robot-assisted gait training plan for patients with stroke. METHODS: 85 patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups, with 31 patients in withdrawal before treatment. The training program comprised 14 2-hour sessions, for 2 consecutive weeks. Patients allocated to the robot-assisted gait training group were treated using the Gait Training and Evaluation System A3 from NX (RT group, n = 27). Another group of patients was allocated to the conventional overground gait training group (PT group, n = 27). Outcome measurements were assessed using time-space parameter gait analysis, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) scores. RESULTS: In the time-space parameter analysis of gait, the two groups exhibited no significant changes in time parameters, but the RT group exhibited a significant effect on changes in space parameters (stride length, walk velocity, and toe out angle, P < 0.05). After training, FMA scores (20.22 ± 2.68) of the PT group and FMA scores (25.89 ± 4.6) of the RT group were significant. In the Timed Up and Go test, FMA scores of the PT group (22.43 ± 3.95) were significant, whereas those in the RT group (21.31 ± 4.92) were not. The comparison between groups revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Both the RT group and the PT group can partially improve the walking ability of stroke patients within 2 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8419501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84195012021-09-07 Robot-Assisted Gait Training Plan for Patients in Poststroke Recovery Period: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Yu, Deng Yang, Zhang Lei, Liu Chaoming, Ni Ming, Wu Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: Walking dysfunction exists in most patients after stroke. Evidence regarding gait training in two weeks is scarce in resource-limited settings; this study was conducted to investigate the effects of a short-term robot-assisted gait training plan for patients with stroke. METHODS: 85 patients were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups, with 31 patients in withdrawal before treatment. The training program comprised 14 2-hour sessions, for 2 consecutive weeks. Patients allocated to the robot-assisted gait training group were treated using the Gait Training and Evaluation System A3 from NX (RT group, n = 27). Another group of patients was allocated to the conventional overground gait training group (PT group, n = 27). Outcome measurements were assessed using time-space parameter gait analysis, Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA), and Timed Up and Go test (TUG) scores. RESULTS: In the time-space parameter analysis of gait, the two groups exhibited no significant changes in time parameters, but the RT group exhibited a significant effect on changes in space parameters (stride length, walk velocity, and toe out angle, P < 0.05). After training, FMA scores (20.22 ± 2.68) of the PT group and FMA scores (25.89 ± 4.6) of the RT group were significant. In the Timed Up and Go test, FMA scores of the PT group (22.43 ± 3.95) were significant, whereas those in the RT group (21.31 ± 4.92) were not. The comparison between groups revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Both the RT group and the PT group can partially improve the walking ability of stroke patients within 2 weeks. Hindawi 2021-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8419501/ /pubmed/34497851 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5820304 Text en Copyright © 2021 Deng Yu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yu, Deng
Yang, Zhang
Lei, Liu
Chaoming, Ni
Ming, Wu
Robot-Assisted Gait Training Plan for Patients in Poststroke Recovery Period: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title Robot-Assisted Gait Training Plan for Patients in Poststroke Recovery Period: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Robot-Assisted Gait Training Plan for Patients in Poststroke Recovery Period: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Robot-Assisted Gait Training Plan for Patients in Poststroke Recovery Period: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Robot-Assisted Gait Training Plan for Patients in Poststroke Recovery Period: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Robot-Assisted Gait Training Plan for Patients in Poststroke Recovery Period: A Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort robot-assisted gait training plan for patients in poststroke recovery period: a single blind randomized controlled trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497851
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5820304
work_keys_str_mv AT yudeng robotassistedgaittrainingplanforpatientsinpoststrokerecoveryperiodasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yangzhang robotassistedgaittrainingplanforpatientsinpoststrokerecoveryperiodasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT leiliu robotassistedgaittrainingplanforpatientsinpoststrokerecoveryperiodasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chaomingni robotassistedgaittrainingplanforpatientsinpoststrokerecoveryperiodasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mingwu robotassistedgaittrainingplanforpatientsinpoststrokerecoveryperiodasingleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial