Cargando…

Differences in Abdominal Body Composition According to Glycemic Status: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that abdominal fat and muscle changes occur in diabetic patients. However, there are few studies about such changes among prediabetic patients. In this study, we evaluated the differences in abdominal fat and muscles based on abdominopelvic computed tomograp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Seungbong, Jeon, Young-Jee, Park, Gyung-Min, Lee, Tae Young, Park, Soon Eun, Yu, Gyeongseok, Kang, Byung Ju
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Endocrine Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2021.1086
_version_ 1783748789518991360
author Han, Seungbong
Jeon, Young-Jee
Park, Gyung-Min
Lee, Tae Young
Park, Soon Eun
Yu, Gyeongseok
Kang, Byung Ju
author_facet Han, Seungbong
Jeon, Young-Jee
Park, Gyung-Min
Lee, Tae Young
Park, Soon Eun
Yu, Gyeongseok
Kang, Byung Ju
author_sort Han, Seungbong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that abdominal fat and muscle changes occur in diabetic patients. However, there are few studies about such changes among prediabetic patients. In this study, we evaluated the differences in abdominal fat and muscles based on abdominopelvic computed tomography in prediabetic and diabetic subjects compared to normal subjects. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using health examination data from March 2014 to June 2019 at Ulsan University Hospital and classified subjects into normal, prediabetic, and diabetic groups. We analyzed the body mass index corrected area of intra-abdominal components among the three groups using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 8,030 subjects were enrolled; 5,137 (64.0%), 2,364 (29.4%), and 529 (6.6%) subjects were included in the normal, prediabetic, and diabetic groups, respectively. After IPTW adjustment of baseline characteristics, there were significant differences in log visceral adipose tissue index (VATI; 1.22±0.64 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)] vs. 1.30±0.63 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)] vs. 1.47±0.64 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)], P<0.001) and low-attenuation muscle index (LAMI; 1.02±0.36 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)] vs. 1.03±0.36 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)] vs. 1.09±0.36 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)], P<0.001) among the normal, prediabetic, and diabetic groups. Prediabetic subjects had higher log VATI (estimated coefficient=0.082, P<0.001), and diabetic subjects had higher log VATI (estimated coefficient=0.248, P<0.001) and LAMI (estimated coefficient=0.078, P<0.001) compared to normal subjects. CONCLUSION: Considering that VATI and LAMI represented visceral fat and lipid-rich skeletal muscle volumes, respectively, visceral obesity was identified in both prediabetic and diabetic subjects compared to normal subjects in this study. However, intra-muscular fat infiltration was observed in diabetic subjects only.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8419614
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Korean Endocrine Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84196142021-09-14 Differences in Abdominal Body Composition According to Glycemic Status: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis Han, Seungbong Jeon, Young-Jee Park, Gyung-Min Lee, Tae Young Park, Soon Eun Yu, Gyeongseok Kang, Byung Ju Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) Original Article BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported that abdominal fat and muscle changes occur in diabetic patients. However, there are few studies about such changes among prediabetic patients. In this study, we evaluated the differences in abdominal fat and muscles based on abdominopelvic computed tomography in prediabetic and diabetic subjects compared to normal subjects. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using health examination data from March 2014 to June 2019 at Ulsan University Hospital and classified subjects into normal, prediabetic, and diabetic groups. We analyzed the body mass index corrected area of intra-abdominal components among the three groups using inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 8,030 subjects were enrolled; 5,137 (64.0%), 2,364 (29.4%), and 529 (6.6%) subjects were included in the normal, prediabetic, and diabetic groups, respectively. After IPTW adjustment of baseline characteristics, there were significant differences in log visceral adipose tissue index (VATI; 1.22±0.64 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)] vs. 1.30±0.63 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)] vs. 1.47±0.64 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)], P<0.001) and low-attenuation muscle index (LAMI; 1.02±0.36 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)] vs. 1.03±0.36 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)] vs. 1.09±0.36 cm(2)/[kg/m(2)], P<0.001) among the normal, prediabetic, and diabetic groups. Prediabetic subjects had higher log VATI (estimated coefficient=0.082, P<0.001), and diabetic subjects had higher log VATI (estimated coefficient=0.248, P<0.001) and LAMI (estimated coefficient=0.078, P<0.001) compared to normal subjects. CONCLUSION: Considering that VATI and LAMI represented visceral fat and lipid-rich skeletal muscle volumes, respectively, visceral obesity was identified in both prediabetic and diabetic subjects compared to normal subjects in this study. However, intra-muscular fat infiltration was observed in diabetic subjects only. Korean Endocrine Society 2021-08 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8419614/ /pubmed/34376042 http://dx.doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2021.1086 Text en Copyright © 2021 Korean Endocrine Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Han, Seungbong
Jeon, Young-Jee
Park, Gyung-Min
Lee, Tae Young
Park, Soon Eun
Yu, Gyeongseok
Kang, Byung Ju
Differences in Abdominal Body Composition According to Glycemic Status: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis
title Differences in Abdominal Body Composition According to Glycemic Status: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis
title_full Differences in Abdominal Body Composition According to Glycemic Status: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis
title_fullStr Differences in Abdominal Body Composition According to Glycemic Status: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Abdominal Body Composition According to Glycemic Status: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis
title_short Differences in Abdominal Body Composition According to Glycemic Status: An Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting Analysis
title_sort differences in abdominal body composition according to glycemic status: an inverse probability treatment weighting analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419614/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34376042
http://dx.doi.org/10.3803/EnM.2021.1086
work_keys_str_mv AT hanseungbong differencesinabdominalbodycompositionaccordingtoglycemicstatusaninverseprobabilitytreatmentweightinganalysis
AT jeonyoungjee differencesinabdominalbodycompositionaccordingtoglycemicstatusaninverseprobabilitytreatmentweightinganalysis
AT parkgyungmin differencesinabdominalbodycompositionaccordingtoglycemicstatusaninverseprobabilitytreatmentweightinganalysis
AT leetaeyoung differencesinabdominalbodycompositionaccordingtoglycemicstatusaninverseprobabilitytreatmentweightinganalysis
AT parksooneun differencesinabdominalbodycompositionaccordingtoglycemicstatusaninverseprobabilitytreatmentweightinganalysis
AT yugyeongseok differencesinabdominalbodycompositionaccordingtoglycemicstatusaninverseprobabilitytreatmentweightinganalysis
AT kangbyungju differencesinabdominalbodycompositionaccordingtoglycemicstatusaninverseprobabilitytreatmentweightinganalysis