Cargando…

Bioluminescent imaging in induced mouse models of endometriosis reveals differences in four model variations

Our understanding of the aetiology and pathophysiology of endometriosis remains limited. Disease modelling in the field is problematic as many versions of induced mouse models of endometriosis exist. We integrated bioluminescent imaging of ‘lesions’ generated using luciferase-expressing donor mice....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorning, Ashley, Dhami, Priya, Panir, Kavita, Hogg, Chloe, Park, Emma, Ferguson, Gregory D., Hargrove, Diane, Karras, James, Horne, Andrew W., Greaves, Erin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34382636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.049070
_version_ 1783748808318910464
author Dorning, Ashley
Dhami, Priya
Panir, Kavita
Hogg, Chloe
Park, Emma
Ferguson, Gregory D.
Hargrove, Diane
Karras, James
Horne, Andrew W.
Greaves, Erin
author_facet Dorning, Ashley
Dhami, Priya
Panir, Kavita
Hogg, Chloe
Park, Emma
Ferguson, Gregory D.
Hargrove, Diane
Karras, James
Horne, Andrew W.
Greaves, Erin
author_sort Dorning, Ashley
collection PubMed
description Our understanding of the aetiology and pathophysiology of endometriosis remains limited. Disease modelling in the field is problematic as many versions of induced mouse models of endometriosis exist. We integrated bioluminescent imaging of ‘lesions’ generated using luciferase-expressing donor mice. We compared longitudinal bioluminescence and histology of lesions, sensory behaviour of mice with induced endometriosis and the impact of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix on lesion regression and sensory behaviour. Four models of endometriosis were tested. We found that the nature of the donor uterine material was a key determinant of how chronic the lesions were, as well as their cellular composition. The severity of pain-like behaviour also varied across models. Although Cetrorelix significantly reduced lesion bioluminescence in all models, it had varying impacts on pain-like behaviour. Collectively, our results demonstrate key differences in the progression of the ‘disease’ across different mouse models of endometriosis. We propose that validation and testing in multiple models, each of which may be representative of the different subtypes/heterogeneity observed in women, should become a standard approach to discovery science in the field of endometriosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8419713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84197132021-09-07 Bioluminescent imaging in induced mouse models of endometriosis reveals differences in four model variations Dorning, Ashley Dhami, Priya Panir, Kavita Hogg, Chloe Park, Emma Ferguson, Gregory D. Hargrove, Diane Karras, James Horne, Andrew W. Greaves, Erin Dis Model Mech Research Article Our understanding of the aetiology and pathophysiology of endometriosis remains limited. Disease modelling in the field is problematic as many versions of induced mouse models of endometriosis exist. We integrated bioluminescent imaging of ‘lesions’ generated using luciferase-expressing donor mice. We compared longitudinal bioluminescence and histology of lesions, sensory behaviour of mice with induced endometriosis and the impact of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix on lesion regression and sensory behaviour. Four models of endometriosis were tested. We found that the nature of the donor uterine material was a key determinant of how chronic the lesions were, as well as their cellular composition. The severity of pain-like behaviour also varied across models. Although Cetrorelix significantly reduced lesion bioluminescence in all models, it had varying impacts on pain-like behaviour. Collectively, our results demonstrate key differences in the progression of the ‘disease’ across different mouse models of endometriosis. We propose that validation and testing in multiple models, each of which may be representative of the different subtypes/heterogeneity observed in women, should become a standard approach to discovery science in the field of endometriosis. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2021-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8419713/ /pubmed/34382636 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.049070 Text en © 2021. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dorning, Ashley
Dhami, Priya
Panir, Kavita
Hogg, Chloe
Park, Emma
Ferguson, Gregory D.
Hargrove, Diane
Karras, James
Horne, Andrew W.
Greaves, Erin
Bioluminescent imaging in induced mouse models of endometriosis reveals differences in four model variations
title Bioluminescent imaging in induced mouse models of endometriosis reveals differences in four model variations
title_full Bioluminescent imaging in induced mouse models of endometriosis reveals differences in four model variations
title_fullStr Bioluminescent imaging in induced mouse models of endometriosis reveals differences in four model variations
title_full_unstemmed Bioluminescent imaging in induced mouse models of endometriosis reveals differences in four model variations
title_short Bioluminescent imaging in induced mouse models of endometriosis reveals differences in four model variations
title_sort bioluminescent imaging in induced mouse models of endometriosis reveals differences in four model variations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34382636
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.049070
work_keys_str_mv AT dorningashley bioluminescentimagingininducedmousemodelsofendometriosisrevealsdifferencesinfourmodelvariations
AT dhamipriya bioluminescentimagingininducedmousemodelsofendometriosisrevealsdifferencesinfourmodelvariations
AT panirkavita bioluminescentimagingininducedmousemodelsofendometriosisrevealsdifferencesinfourmodelvariations
AT hoggchloe bioluminescentimagingininducedmousemodelsofendometriosisrevealsdifferencesinfourmodelvariations
AT parkemma bioluminescentimagingininducedmousemodelsofendometriosisrevealsdifferencesinfourmodelvariations
AT fergusongregoryd bioluminescentimagingininducedmousemodelsofendometriosisrevealsdifferencesinfourmodelvariations
AT hargrovediane bioluminescentimagingininducedmousemodelsofendometriosisrevealsdifferencesinfourmodelvariations
AT karrasjames bioluminescentimagingininducedmousemodelsofendometriosisrevealsdifferencesinfourmodelvariations
AT horneandreww bioluminescentimagingininducedmousemodelsofendometriosisrevealsdifferencesinfourmodelvariations
AT greaveserin bioluminescentimagingininducedmousemodelsofendometriosisrevealsdifferencesinfourmodelvariations