Cargando…

Macular Rod Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured With Scotopic Microperimetry

PURPOSE: To investigate the validity and reliability of macular rod photoreceptor function measurement with a microperimeter. METHODS: Macular sensitivity in dark-adapted retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients (22 eyes; 9–67 years of age) and controls (five eyes; 22–55 years of age) was assessed with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishnan, Arun K., Roman, Alejandro J., Swider, Malgorzata, Jacobson, Samuel G., Cideciyan, Artur V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34473224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.11.3
_version_ 1783748846050869248
author Krishnan, Arun K.
Roman, Alejandro J.
Swider, Malgorzata
Jacobson, Samuel G.
Cideciyan, Artur V.
author_facet Krishnan, Arun K.
Roman, Alejandro J.
Swider, Malgorzata
Jacobson, Samuel G.
Cideciyan, Artur V.
author_sort Krishnan, Arun K.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the validity and reliability of macular rod photoreceptor function measurement with a microperimeter. METHODS: Macular sensitivity in dark-adapted retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients (22 eyes; 9–67 years of age) and controls (five eyes; 22–55 years of age) was assessed with a modified Humphrey field analyzer (mHFA), as well as a scotopic microperimeter (Nidek MP-1S). Sensitivity loss (SL) was estimated at rod-mediated locations. All RP eyes were re-evaluated at a second visit 6 months later. The dynamic range of the MP-1S was expanded with a range of neutral-density filters (NDFs). RESULTS: In controls, a 4 NDF was used at all macular locations tested. In patients with RP, 0 to 3 NDFs were used, depending on the local disease severity. At rod-mediated locations (n = 281), SL estimates obtained with the MP-1S were highly correlated (r = 0.80) with those of the mHFA. The inter-perimeter difference of SL averaged less than 3 decibels (dB) with all NDFs, except those with most severe locations evaluated with a 0 NDF, where the difference averaged more than 6 dB. The results were similar on the second visit. CONCLUSIONS: The MP-1S estimates of SL are highly correlated with those of the mHFA over a wide range of disease severity replicated at two visits; however, there was an unexplained bias in the magnitude of SL estimated by the MP-1S especially at loci with severe disease. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: MP-1S scotopic microperimetry can be used to evaluate changes to macular rod function, but evaluation of treatment potential by quantitative comparison of SL to retinal structure will be more challenging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8419874
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84198742021-09-22 Macular Rod Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured With Scotopic Microperimetry Krishnan, Arun K. Roman, Alejandro J. Swider, Malgorzata Jacobson, Samuel G. Cideciyan, Artur V. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To investigate the validity and reliability of macular rod photoreceptor function measurement with a microperimeter. METHODS: Macular sensitivity in dark-adapted retinitis pigmentosa (RP) patients (22 eyes; 9–67 years of age) and controls (five eyes; 22–55 years of age) was assessed with a modified Humphrey field analyzer (mHFA), as well as a scotopic microperimeter (Nidek MP-1S). Sensitivity loss (SL) was estimated at rod-mediated locations. All RP eyes were re-evaluated at a second visit 6 months later. The dynamic range of the MP-1S was expanded with a range of neutral-density filters (NDFs). RESULTS: In controls, a 4 NDF was used at all macular locations tested. In patients with RP, 0 to 3 NDFs were used, depending on the local disease severity. At rod-mediated locations (n = 281), SL estimates obtained with the MP-1S were highly correlated (r = 0.80) with those of the mHFA. The inter-perimeter difference of SL averaged less than 3 decibels (dB) with all NDFs, except those with most severe locations evaluated with a 0 NDF, where the difference averaged more than 6 dB. The results were similar on the second visit. CONCLUSIONS: The MP-1S estimates of SL are highly correlated with those of the mHFA over a wide range of disease severity replicated at two visits; however, there was an unexplained bias in the magnitude of SL estimated by the MP-1S especially at loci with severe disease. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: MP-1S scotopic microperimetry can be used to evaluate changes to macular rod function, but evaluation of treatment potential by quantitative comparison of SL to retinal structure will be more challenging. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2021-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8419874/ /pubmed/34473224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.11.3 Text en Copyright 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Krishnan, Arun K.
Roman, Alejandro J.
Swider, Malgorzata
Jacobson, Samuel G.
Cideciyan, Artur V.
Macular Rod Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured With Scotopic Microperimetry
title Macular Rod Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured With Scotopic Microperimetry
title_full Macular Rod Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured With Scotopic Microperimetry
title_fullStr Macular Rod Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured With Scotopic Microperimetry
title_full_unstemmed Macular Rod Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured With Scotopic Microperimetry
title_short Macular Rod Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa Measured With Scotopic Microperimetry
title_sort macular rod function in retinitis pigmentosa measured with scotopic microperimetry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419874/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34473224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.10.11.3
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnanarunk macularrodfunctioninretinitispigmentosameasuredwithscotopicmicroperimetry
AT romanalejandroj macularrodfunctioninretinitispigmentosameasuredwithscotopicmicroperimetry
AT swidermalgorzata macularrodfunctioninretinitispigmentosameasuredwithscotopicmicroperimetry
AT jacobsonsamuelg macularrodfunctioninretinitispigmentosameasuredwithscotopicmicroperimetry
AT cideciyanarturv macularrodfunctioninretinitispigmentosameasuredwithscotopicmicroperimetry