Cargando…

Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure

BACKGROUND: The Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure (NAT: PD-HF) is a tool created to assess the needs of people living with heart failure and their informal caregivers to assist delivering care in a more comprehensive way that addresses actual needs that are unmet, and to impro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina, Guyer, Jelena, Luethi, Nora, Sobanski, Piotr, Zbinden, Rut, Rodriguez, Eveline, Hunziker, Lukas, Eychmüller, Steffen, Maessen, Maud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6
_version_ 1783748861679894528
author Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina
Guyer, Jelena
Luethi, Nora
Sobanski, Piotr
Zbinden, Rut
Rodriguez, Eveline
Hunziker, Lukas
Eychmüller, Steffen
Maessen, Maud
author_facet Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina
Guyer, Jelena
Luethi, Nora
Sobanski, Piotr
Zbinden, Rut
Rodriguez, Eveline
Hunziker, Lukas
Eychmüller, Steffen
Maessen, Maud
author_sort Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure (NAT: PD-HF) is a tool created to assess the needs of people living with heart failure and their informal caregivers to assist delivering care in a more comprehensive way that addresses actual needs that are unmet, and to improve quality of life. In this study, we aimed to (1) Translate the tool into German and culturally adapt it. (2) Assess internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test–retest reliability of the German NAT: PD-HF. (3) Evaluate whether and how patients and health care personnel understand the tool and its utility. (4) Assess the tool’s face validity, applicability, relevance, and acceptability among health care personnel. METHODS: Single-center validation study. The tool was translated from English into German using a forward–backward translation. To assess internal consistency, we used Cronbach´s alpha. To assess inter-rater reliability and test–retest reliability, we used Cohen´s kappa, and to assess validity we used face validity. RESULTS: The translated tool showed good internal consistency. Raters were in substantial agreement on a majority of the questions, and agreement was almost perfect for all the questions in the test–retest analysis. Face validity was rated high by health care personnel. CONCLUSION: The German NAT: PD-HF is a reliable, valid, and internally consistent tool that is well accepted by both patients and health care personnel. However, it is important to keep in mind that effective use of the tool requires training of health care personnel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8419951
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84199512021-09-09 Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina Guyer, Jelena Luethi, Nora Sobanski, Piotr Zbinden, Rut Rodriguez, Eveline Hunziker, Lukas Eychmüller, Steffen Maessen, Maud Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure (NAT: PD-HF) is a tool created to assess the needs of people living with heart failure and their informal caregivers to assist delivering care in a more comprehensive way that addresses actual needs that are unmet, and to improve quality of life. In this study, we aimed to (1) Translate the tool into German and culturally adapt it. (2) Assess internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test–retest reliability of the German NAT: PD-HF. (3) Evaluate whether and how patients and health care personnel understand the tool and its utility. (4) Assess the tool’s face validity, applicability, relevance, and acceptability among health care personnel. METHODS: Single-center validation study. The tool was translated from English into German using a forward–backward translation. To assess internal consistency, we used Cronbach´s alpha. To assess inter-rater reliability and test–retest reliability, we used Cohen´s kappa, and to assess validity we used face validity. RESULTS: The translated tool showed good internal consistency. Raters were in substantial agreement on a majority of the questions, and agreement was almost perfect for all the questions in the test–retest analysis. Face validity was rated high by health care personnel. CONCLUSION: The German NAT: PD-HF is a reliable, valid, and internally consistent tool that is well accepted by both patients and health care personnel. However, it is important to keep in mind that effective use of the tool requires training of health care personnel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6. BioMed Central 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8419951/ /pubmed/34488787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina
Guyer, Jelena
Luethi, Nora
Sobanski, Piotr
Zbinden, Rut
Rodriguez, Eveline
Hunziker, Lukas
Eychmüller, Steffen
Maessen, Maud
Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure
title Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure
title_full Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure
title_fullStr Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure
title_short Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure
title_sort validation of the german version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419951/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezjaramillovalentina validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure
AT guyerjelena validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure
AT luethinora validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure
AT sobanskipiotr validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure
AT zbindenrut validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure
AT rodriguezeveline validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure
AT hunzikerlukas validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure
AT eychmullersteffen validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure
AT maessenmaud validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure