Cargando…
Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure
BACKGROUND: The Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure (NAT: PD-HF) is a tool created to assess the needs of people living with heart failure and their informal caregivers to assist delivering care in a more comprehensive way that addresses actual needs that are unmet, and to impro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6 |
_version_ | 1783748861679894528 |
---|---|
author | Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina Guyer, Jelena Luethi, Nora Sobanski, Piotr Zbinden, Rut Rodriguez, Eveline Hunziker, Lukas Eychmüller, Steffen Maessen, Maud |
author_facet | Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina Guyer, Jelena Luethi, Nora Sobanski, Piotr Zbinden, Rut Rodriguez, Eveline Hunziker, Lukas Eychmüller, Steffen Maessen, Maud |
author_sort | Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure (NAT: PD-HF) is a tool created to assess the needs of people living with heart failure and their informal caregivers to assist delivering care in a more comprehensive way that addresses actual needs that are unmet, and to improve quality of life. In this study, we aimed to (1) Translate the tool into German and culturally adapt it. (2) Assess internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test–retest reliability of the German NAT: PD-HF. (3) Evaluate whether and how patients and health care personnel understand the tool and its utility. (4) Assess the tool’s face validity, applicability, relevance, and acceptability among health care personnel. METHODS: Single-center validation study. The tool was translated from English into German using a forward–backward translation. To assess internal consistency, we used Cronbach´s alpha. To assess inter-rater reliability and test–retest reliability, we used Cohen´s kappa, and to assess validity we used face validity. RESULTS: The translated tool showed good internal consistency. Raters were in substantial agreement on a majority of the questions, and agreement was almost perfect for all the questions in the test–retest analysis. Face validity was rated high by health care personnel. CONCLUSION: The German NAT: PD-HF is a reliable, valid, and internally consistent tool that is well accepted by both patients and health care personnel. However, it is important to keep in mind that effective use of the tool requires training of health care personnel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8419951 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84199512021-09-09 Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina Guyer, Jelena Luethi, Nora Sobanski, Piotr Zbinden, Rut Rodriguez, Eveline Hunziker, Lukas Eychmüller, Steffen Maessen, Maud Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: The Needs Assessment Tool: Progressive Disease-Heart Failure (NAT: PD-HF) is a tool created to assess the needs of people living with heart failure and their informal caregivers to assist delivering care in a more comprehensive way that addresses actual needs that are unmet, and to improve quality of life. In this study, we aimed to (1) Translate the tool into German and culturally adapt it. (2) Assess internal consistency, inter-rater reliability, and test–retest reliability of the German NAT: PD-HF. (3) Evaluate whether and how patients and health care personnel understand the tool and its utility. (4) Assess the tool’s face validity, applicability, relevance, and acceptability among health care personnel. METHODS: Single-center validation study. The tool was translated from English into German using a forward–backward translation. To assess internal consistency, we used Cronbach´s alpha. To assess inter-rater reliability and test–retest reliability, we used Cohen´s kappa, and to assess validity we used face validity. RESULTS: The translated tool showed good internal consistency. Raters were in substantial agreement on a majority of the questions, and agreement was almost perfect for all the questions in the test–retest analysis. Face validity was rated high by health care personnel. CONCLUSION: The German NAT: PD-HF is a reliable, valid, and internally consistent tool that is well accepted by both patients and health care personnel. However, it is important to keep in mind that effective use of the tool requires training of health care personnel. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6. BioMed Central 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8419951/ /pubmed/34488787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Valentina Guyer, Jelena Luethi, Nora Sobanski, Piotr Zbinden, Rut Rodriguez, Eveline Hunziker, Lukas Eychmüller, Steffen Maessen, Maud Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure |
title | Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure |
title_full | Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure |
title_fullStr | Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure |
title_short | Validation of the German version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure |
title_sort | validation of the german version of the needs assessment tool: progressive disease-heart failure |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419951/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01817-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gonzalezjaramillovalentina validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure AT guyerjelena validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure AT luethinora validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure AT sobanskipiotr validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure AT zbindenrut validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure AT rodriguezeveline validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure AT hunzikerlukas validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure AT eychmullersteffen validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure AT maessenmaud validationofthegermanversionoftheneedsassessmenttoolprogressivediseaseheartfailure |