Cargando…

Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study

BACKGROUND: Language is a barrier to many patients from refugee backgrounds accessing and receiving quality primary health care. This paper examines the way general practices address these barriers and how this changed following a practice facilitation intervention. METHODS: The OPTIMISE study was a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saito, Shoko, Harris, Mark F, Long, Katrina M, Lewis, Virginia, Casey, Sue, Hogg, William, Cheng, I-Hao, Advocat, Jenny, Marsh, Geraldine, Gunatillaka, Nilakshi, Russell, Grant
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5
_version_ 1783748867045457920
author Saito, Shoko
Harris, Mark F
Long, Katrina M
Lewis, Virginia
Casey, Sue
Hogg, William
Cheng, I-Hao
Advocat, Jenny
Marsh, Geraldine
Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
Russell, Grant
author_facet Saito, Shoko
Harris, Mark F
Long, Katrina M
Lewis, Virginia
Casey, Sue
Hogg, William
Cheng, I-Hao
Advocat, Jenny
Marsh, Geraldine
Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
Russell, Grant
author_sort Saito, Shoko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Language is a barrier to many patients from refugee backgrounds accessing and receiving quality primary health care. This paper examines the way general practices address these barriers and how this changed following a practice facilitation intervention. METHODS: The OPTIMISE study was a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial set within 31 general practices in three urban regions in Australia with high refugee settlement. It involved a practice facilitation intervention addressing interpreter engagement as one of four core intervention areas. This paper analysed quantitative and qualitative data from the practices and 55 general practitioners from these, collected at baseline and after 6 months during which only those assigned to the early group received the intervention. RESULTS: Many practices (71 %) had at least one GP who spoke a language spoken by recent humanitarian entrants. At baseline, 48 % of practices reported using the government funded Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS). The role of reception staff in assessing and recording the language and interpreter needs of patients was well defined. However, they lacked effective systems to share the information with clinicians. After the intervention, the number of practices using the TIS increased. However, family members and friends continued to be used to interpret with GPs reporting patients preferred this approach. The extra time required to arrange and use interpreting services remained a major barrier. CONCLUSIONS: In this study a whole of practice facilitation intervention resulted in improvements in procedures for and engagement of interpreters. However, there were barriers such as the extra time required, and family members continued to be used. Based on these findings, further effort is needed to reduce the administrative burden and GP’s opportunity cost needed to engage interpreters, to provide training for all staff on when and how to work with interpreters and discuss and respond to patient concerns about interpreting services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8419978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84199782021-09-09 Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study Saito, Shoko Harris, Mark F Long, Katrina M Lewis, Virginia Casey, Sue Hogg, William Cheng, I-Hao Advocat, Jenny Marsh, Geraldine Gunatillaka, Nilakshi Russell, Grant BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Language is a barrier to many patients from refugee backgrounds accessing and receiving quality primary health care. This paper examines the way general practices address these barriers and how this changed following a practice facilitation intervention. METHODS: The OPTIMISE study was a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial set within 31 general practices in three urban regions in Australia with high refugee settlement. It involved a practice facilitation intervention addressing interpreter engagement as one of four core intervention areas. This paper analysed quantitative and qualitative data from the practices and 55 general practitioners from these, collected at baseline and after 6 months during which only those assigned to the early group received the intervention. RESULTS: Many practices (71 %) had at least one GP who spoke a language spoken by recent humanitarian entrants. At baseline, 48 % of practices reported using the government funded Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS). The role of reception staff in assessing and recording the language and interpreter needs of patients was well defined. However, they lacked effective systems to share the information with clinicians. After the intervention, the number of practices using the TIS increased. However, family members and friends continued to be used to interpret with GPs reporting patients preferred this approach. The extra time required to arrange and use interpreting services remained a major barrier. CONCLUSIONS: In this study a whole of practice facilitation intervention resulted in improvements in procedures for and engagement of interpreters. However, there were barriers such as the extra time required, and family members continued to be used. Based on these findings, further effort is needed to reduce the administrative burden and GP’s opportunity cost needed to engage interpreters, to provide training for all staff on when and how to work with interpreters and discuss and respond to patient concerns about interpreting services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5. BioMed Central 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8419978/ /pubmed/34488719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Saito, Shoko
Harris, Mark F
Long, Katrina M
Lewis, Virginia
Casey, Sue
Hogg, William
Cheng, I-Hao
Advocat, Jenny
Marsh, Geraldine
Gunatillaka, Nilakshi
Russell, Grant
Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study
title Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study
title_full Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study
title_fullStr Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study
title_full_unstemmed Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study
title_short Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study
title_sort response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in australia: findings from the optimise study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5
work_keys_str_mv AT saitoshoko responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy
AT harrismarkf responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy
AT longkatrinam responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy
AT lewisvirginia responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy
AT caseysue responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy
AT hoggwilliam responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy
AT chengihao responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy
AT advocatjenny responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy
AT marshgeraldine responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy
AT gunatillakanilakshi responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy
AT russellgrant responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy