Cargando…
Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study
BACKGROUND: Language is a barrier to many patients from refugee backgrounds accessing and receiving quality primary health care. This paper examines the way general practices address these barriers and how this changed following a practice facilitation intervention. METHODS: The OPTIMISE study was a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5 |
_version_ | 1783748867045457920 |
---|---|
author | Saito, Shoko Harris, Mark F Long, Katrina M Lewis, Virginia Casey, Sue Hogg, William Cheng, I-Hao Advocat, Jenny Marsh, Geraldine Gunatillaka, Nilakshi Russell, Grant |
author_facet | Saito, Shoko Harris, Mark F Long, Katrina M Lewis, Virginia Casey, Sue Hogg, William Cheng, I-Hao Advocat, Jenny Marsh, Geraldine Gunatillaka, Nilakshi Russell, Grant |
author_sort | Saito, Shoko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Language is a barrier to many patients from refugee backgrounds accessing and receiving quality primary health care. This paper examines the way general practices address these barriers and how this changed following a practice facilitation intervention. METHODS: The OPTIMISE study was a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial set within 31 general practices in three urban regions in Australia with high refugee settlement. It involved a practice facilitation intervention addressing interpreter engagement as one of four core intervention areas. This paper analysed quantitative and qualitative data from the practices and 55 general practitioners from these, collected at baseline and after 6 months during which only those assigned to the early group received the intervention. RESULTS: Many practices (71 %) had at least one GP who spoke a language spoken by recent humanitarian entrants. At baseline, 48 % of practices reported using the government funded Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS). The role of reception staff in assessing and recording the language and interpreter needs of patients was well defined. However, they lacked effective systems to share the information with clinicians. After the intervention, the number of practices using the TIS increased. However, family members and friends continued to be used to interpret with GPs reporting patients preferred this approach. The extra time required to arrange and use interpreting services remained a major barrier. CONCLUSIONS: In this study a whole of practice facilitation intervention resulted in improvements in procedures for and engagement of interpreters. However, there were barriers such as the extra time required, and family members continued to be used. Based on these findings, further effort is needed to reduce the administrative burden and GP’s opportunity cost needed to engage interpreters, to provide training for all staff on when and how to work with interpreters and discuss and respond to patient concerns about interpreting services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8419978 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84199782021-09-09 Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study Saito, Shoko Harris, Mark F Long, Katrina M Lewis, Virginia Casey, Sue Hogg, William Cheng, I-Hao Advocat, Jenny Marsh, Geraldine Gunatillaka, Nilakshi Russell, Grant BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Language is a barrier to many patients from refugee backgrounds accessing and receiving quality primary health care. This paper examines the way general practices address these barriers and how this changed following a practice facilitation intervention. METHODS: The OPTIMISE study was a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial set within 31 general practices in three urban regions in Australia with high refugee settlement. It involved a practice facilitation intervention addressing interpreter engagement as one of four core intervention areas. This paper analysed quantitative and qualitative data from the practices and 55 general practitioners from these, collected at baseline and after 6 months during which only those assigned to the early group received the intervention. RESULTS: Many practices (71 %) had at least one GP who spoke a language spoken by recent humanitarian entrants. At baseline, 48 % of practices reported using the government funded Translating and Interpreting Service (TIS). The role of reception staff in assessing and recording the language and interpreter needs of patients was well defined. However, they lacked effective systems to share the information with clinicians. After the intervention, the number of practices using the TIS increased. However, family members and friends continued to be used to interpret with GPs reporting patients preferred this approach. The extra time required to arrange and use interpreting services remained a major barrier. CONCLUSIONS: In this study a whole of practice facilitation intervention resulted in improvements in procedures for and engagement of interpreters. However, there were barriers such as the extra time required, and family members continued to be used. Based on these findings, further effort is needed to reduce the administrative burden and GP’s opportunity cost needed to engage interpreters, to provide training for all staff on when and how to work with interpreters and discuss and respond to patient concerns about interpreting services. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5. BioMed Central 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8419978/ /pubmed/34488719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Saito, Shoko Harris, Mark F Long, Katrina M Lewis, Virginia Casey, Sue Hogg, William Cheng, I-Hao Advocat, Jenny Marsh, Geraldine Gunatillaka, Nilakshi Russell, Grant Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study |
title | Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study |
title_full | Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study |
title_fullStr | Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study |
title_full_unstemmed | Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study |
title_short | Response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in Australia: findings from the OPTIMISE study |
title_sort | response to language barriers with patients from refugee background in general practice in australia: findings from the optimise study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8419978/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06884-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saitoshoko responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy AT harrismarkf responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy AT longkatrinam responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy AT lewisvirginia responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy AT caseysue responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy AT hoggwilliam responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy AT chengihao responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy AT advocatjenny responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy AT marshgeraldine responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy AT gunatillakanilakshi responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy AT russellgrant responsetolanguagebarrierswithpatientsfromrefugeebackgroundingeneralpracticeinaustraliafindingsfromtheoptimisestudy |