Cargando…

Efficacy information influences intention to take COVID‐19 vaccine

OBJECTIVES: A successful response to the COVID‐19 pandemic requires achieving high levels of vaccine uptake. We tested whether directly contrasting the high efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines with the lower efficacy of the annual flu vaccine would increase intentions to take a COVID‐19 vaccine. DESIGN: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Colin J., Golding, Matt, McKay, Ryan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12546
_version_ 1783748912339746816
author Davis, Colin J.
Golding, Matt
McKay, Ryan
author_facet Davis, Colin J.
Golding, Matt
McKay, Ryan
author_sort Davis, Colin J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: A successful response to the COVID‐19 pandemic requires achieving high levels of vaccine uptake. We tested whether directly contrasting the high efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines with the lower efficacy of the annual flu vaccine would increase intentions to take a COVID‐19 vaccine. DESIGN: A pre‐registered online study of 481 participants compared four information conditions: (1) no information; (2) COVID‐19 Vaccine Information Only; and COVID‐19 Vaccine Information combined with flu vaccine information suggesting either (3) 60% efficacy or (4) 40% efficacy; we measured COVID‐19 and flu vaccine intentions along with several other vaccine‐related variables. METHODS: The Prolific platform was used to recruit 481 UK participants (64% female; aged between 18 and 85 years) who had been pre‐screened to have intermediate levels of vaccine hesitancy. After reading a short text (~200 words) about COVID‐19 vaccines, participants were asked about their vaccination intentions. RESULTS: Providing information about the safety and efficacy of the new COVID‐19 vaccines resulted in vaccination intentions that were, on average, 0.39 standard deviations (SDs) higher than those in the no information condition; providing the same COVID vaccine efficacy information in the context of information about flu vaccine efficacy resulted in a further significant increase in vaccination intentions that were 0.68 SD higher than those in the no information condition. This positive contrast effect for the COVID‐19 vaccine was not associated with reduced flu vaccine intentions. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination intentions can be strengthened through a simple messaging intervention that utilizes context effects to increase perceived response efficacy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8420419
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84204192021-09-07 Efficacy information influences intention to take COVID‐19 vaccine Davis, Colin J. Golding, Matt McKay, Ryan Br J Health Psychol Original Articles OBJECTIVES: A successful response to the COVID‐19 pandemic requires achieving high levels of vaccine uptake. We tested whether directly contrasting the high efficacy of COVID‐19 vaccines with the lower efficacy of the annual flu vaccine would increase intentions to take a COVID‐19 vaccine. DESIGN: A pre‐registered online study of 481 participants compared four information conditions: (1) no information; (2) COVID‐19 Vaccine Information Only; and COVID‐19 Vaccine Information combined with flu vaccine information suggesting either (3) 60% efficacy or (4) 40% efficacy; we measured COVID‐19 and flu vaccine intentions along with several other vaccine‐related variables. METHODS: The Prolific platform was used to recruit 481 UK participants (64% female; aged between 18 and 85 years) who had been pre‐screened to have intermediate levels of vaccine hesitancy. After reading a short text (~200 words) about COVID‐19 vaccines, participants were asked about their vaccination intentions. RESULTS: Providing information about the safety and efficacy of the new COVID‐19 vaccines resulted in vaccination intentions that were, on average, 0.39 standard deviations (SDs) higher than those in the no information condition; providing the same COVID vaccine efficacy information in the context of information about flu vaccine efficacy resulted in a further significant increase in vaccination intentions that were 0.68 SD higher than those in the no information condition. This positive contrast effect for the COVID‐19 vaccine was not associated with reduced flu vaccine intentions. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccination intentions can be strengthened through a simple messaging intervention that utilizes context effects to increase perceived response efficacy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-07-11 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8420419/ /pubmed/34250684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12546 Text en © 2021 The Authors. British Journal of Health Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Davis, Colin J.
Golding, Matt
McKay, Ryan
Efficacy information influences intention to take COVID‐19 vaccine
title Efficacy information influences intention to take COVID‐19 vaccine
title_full Efficacy information influences intention to take COVID‐19 vaccine
title_fullStr Efficacy information influences intention to take COVID‐19 vaccine
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy information influences intention to take COVID‐19 vaccine
title_short Efficacy information influences intention to take COVID‐19 vaccine
title_sort efficacy information influences intention to take covid‐19 vaccine
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420419/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34250684
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12546
work_keys_str_mv AT daviscolinj efficacyinformationinfluencesintentiontotakecovid19vaccine
AT goldingmatt efficacyinformationinfluencesintentiontotakecovid19vaccine
AT mckayryan efficacyinformationinfluencesintentiontotakecovid19vaccine