Cargando…
Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts
BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of COVID‐19 on computed tomography (CT) imaging of cancer. METHODS: Cancer‐related CTs performed at one academic hospital and three affiliated community hospitals in Massachusetts were retrospectively analyzed. Three periods of 2020 were considered as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34355873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4183 |
_version_ | 1783748917359280128 |
---|---|
author | Zattra, Ottavia Fraga, Anthony Lu, Nancy Gee, Michael S. Liu, Raymond W. Lev, Michael H. Brink, James A. Saini, Sanjay Lang, Min Succi, Marc D. |
author_facet | Zattra, Ottavia Fraga, Anthony Lu, Nancy Gee, Michael S. Liu, Raymond W. Lev, Michael H. Brink, James A. Saini, Sanjay Lang, Min Succi, Marc D. |
author_sort | Zattra, Ottavia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of COVID‐19 on computed tomography (CT) imaging of cancer. METHODS: Cancer‐related CTs performed at one academic hospital and three affiliated community hospitals in Massachusetts were retrospectively analyzed. Three periods of 2020 were considered as follows: pre‐COVID‐19 (1/5/20–3/14/20), COVID‐19 peak (3/15/20–5/2/20), and post‐COVID‐19 peak (5/3/20–11/14/20). 15 March 2020 was the day a state of emergency was declared in MA; 3 May 2020 was the day our hospitals resumed to non‐urgent imaging. The volumes were assessed by (1) Imaging indication: cancer screening, initial workup, active cancer, and surveillance; (2) Care setting: outpatient and inpatient, ED; (3) Hospital type: quaternary academic center (QAC), university‐affiliated community hospital (UACH), and sole community hospitals (SCHs). RESULTS: During the COVID‐19 peak, a significant drop in CT volumes was observed (−42.2%, p < 0.0001), with cancer screening, initial workup, active cancer, and cancer surveillance declining by 81.7%, 54.8%, 30.7%, and 44.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In the post‐COVID‐19 peak period, cancer screening and initial workup CTs did not recover (−11.7%, p = 0.037; −20.0%, p = 0.031), especially in the outpatient setting. CT volumes for active cancer recovered, but inconsistently across hospital types: the QAC experienced a 9.4% decline (p = 0.022) and the UACH a 41.5% increase (p < 0.001). Outpatient CTs recovered after the COVID‐19 peak, but with a shift in utilization away from the QAC (−8.7%, p = 0.020) toward the UACH (+13.3%, p = 0.013). Inpatient and ED‐based oncologic CTs increased post‐peak (+20.0%, p = 0.004 and +33.2%, p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer imaging was severely impacted during the COVID‐19 pandemic. CTs for cancer screening and initial workup did not recover to pre‐COVID‐19 levels well into 2020, a finding that suggests more patients with advanced cancers may present in the future. A redistribution of imaging utilization away from the QAC and outpatient settings, toward the community hospitals and inpatient setting/ED was observed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8420511 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84205112021-09-07 Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts Zattra, Ottavia Fraga, Anthony Lu, Nancy Gee, Michael S. Liu, Raymond W. Lev, Michael H. Brink, James A. Saini, Sanjay Lang, Min Succi, Marc D. Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of COVID‐19 on computed tomography (CT) imaging of cancer. METHODS: Cancer‐related CTs performed at one academic hospital and three affiliated community hospitals in Massachusetts were retrospectively analyzed. Three periods of 2020 were considered as follows: pre‐COVID‐19 (1/5/20–3/14/20), COVID‐19 peak (3/15/20–5/2/20), and post‐COVID‐19 peak (5/3/20–11/14/20). 15 March 2020 was the day a state of emergency was declared in MA; 3 May 2020 was the day our hospitals resumed to non‐urgent imaging. The volumes were assessed by (1) Imaging indication: cancer screening, initial workup, active cancer, and surveillance; (2) Care setting: outpatient and inpatient, ED; (3) Hospital type: quaternary academic center (QAC), university‐affiliated community hospital (UACH), and sole community hospitals (SCHs). RESULTS: During the COVID‐19 peak, a significant drop in CT volumes was observed (−42.2%, p < 0.0001), with cancer screening, initial workup, active cancer, and cancer surveillance declining by 81.7%, 54.8%, 30.7%, and 44.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In the post‐COVID‐19 peak period, cancer screening and initial workup CTs did not recover (−11.7%, p = 0.037; −20.0%, p = 0.031), especially in the outpatient setting. CT volumes for active cancer recovered, but inconsistently across hospital types: the QAC experienced a 9.4% decline (p = 0.022) and the UACH a 41.5% increase (p < 0.001). Outpatient CTs recovered after the COVID‐19 peak, but with a shift in utilization away from the QAC (−8.7%, p = 0.020) toward the UACH (+13.3%, p = 0.013). Inpatient and ED‐based oncologic CTs increased post‐peak (+20.0%, p = 0.004 and +33.2%, p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer imaging was severely impacted during the COVID‐19 pandemic. CTs for cancer screening and initial workup did not recover to pre‐COVID‐19 levels well into 2020, a finding that suggests more patients with advanced cancers may present in the future. A redistribution of imaging utilization away from the QAC and outpatient settings, toward the community hospitals and inpatient setting/ED was observed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8420511/ /pubmed/34355873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4183 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Zattra, Ottavia Fraga, Anthony Lu, Nancy Gee, Michael S. Liu, Raymond W. Lev, Michael H. Brink, James A. Saini, Sanjay Lang, Min Succi, Marc D. Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts |
title | Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts |
title_full | Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts |
title_fullStr | Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts |
title_full_unstemmed | Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts |
title_short | Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts |
title_sort | trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the covid‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in massachusetts |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420511/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34355873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4183 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zattraottavia trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts AT fragaanthony trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts AT lunancy trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts AT geemichaels trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts AT liuraymondw trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts AT levmichaelh trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts AT brinkjamesa trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts AT sainisanjay trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts AT langmin trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts AT succimarcd trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts |