Cargando…

Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of COVID‐19 on computed tomography (CT) imaging of cancer. METHODS: Cancer‐related CTs performed at one academic hospital and three affiliated community hospitals in Massachusetts were retrospectively analyzed. Three periods of 2020 were considered as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zattra, Ottavia, Fraga, Anthony, Lu, Nancy, Gee, Michael S., Liu, Raymond W., Lev, Michael H., Brink, James A., Saini, Sanjay, Lang, Min, Succi, Marc D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34355873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4183
_version_ 1783748917359280128
author Zattra, Ottavia
Fraga, Anthony
Lu, Nancy
Gee, Michael S.
Liu, Raymond W.
Lev, Michael H.
Brink, James A.
Saini, Sanjay
Lang, Min
Succi, Marc D.
author_facet Zattra, Ottavia
Fraga, Anthony
Lu, Nancy
Gee, Michael S.
Liu, Raymond W.
Lev, Michael H.
Brink, James A.
Saini, Sanjay
Lang, Min
Succi, Marc D.
author_sort Zattra, Ottavia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of COVID‐19 on computed tomography (CT) imaging of cancer. METHODS: Cancer‐related CTs performed at one academic hospital and three affiliated community hospitals in Massachusetts were retrospectively analyzed. Three periods of 2020 were considered as follows: pre‐COVID‐19 (1/5/20–3/14/20), COVID‐19 peak (3/15/20–5/2/20), and post‐COVID‐19 peak (5/3/20–11/14/20). 15 March 2020 was the day a state of emergency was declared in MA; 3 May 2020 was the day our hospitals resumed to non‐urgent imaging. The volumes were assessed by (1) Imaging indication: cancer screening, initial workup, active cancer, and surveillance; (2) Care setting: outpatient and inpatient, ED; (3) Hospital type: quaternary academic center (QAC), university‐affiliated community hospital (UACH), and sole community hospitals (SCHs). RESULTS: During the COVID‐19 peak, a significant drop in CT volumes was observed (−42.2%, p < 0.0001), with cancer screening, initial workup, active cancer, and cancer surveillance declining by 81.7%, 54.8%, 30.7%, and 44.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In the post‐COVID‐19 peak period, cancer screening and initial workup CTs did not recover (−11.7%, p = 0.037; −20.0%, p = 0.031), especially in the outpatient setting. CT volumes for active cancer recovered, but inconsistently across hospital types: the QAC experienced a 9.4% decline (p = 0.022) and the UACH a 41.5% increase (p < 0.001). Outpatient CTs recovered after the COVID‐19 peak, but with a shift in utilization away from the QAC (−8.7%, p = 0.020) toward the UACH (+13.3%, p = 0.013). Inpatient and ED‐based oncologic CTs increased post‐peak (+20.0%, p = 0.004 and +33.2%, p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer imaging was severely impacted during the COVID‐19 pandemic. CTs for cancer screening and initial workup did not recover to pre‐COVID‐19 levels well into 2020, a finding that suggests more patients with advanced cancers may present in the future. A redistribution of imaging utilization away from the QAC and outpatient settings, toward the community hospitals and inpatient setting/ED was observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8420511
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84205112021-09-07 Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts Zattra, Ottavia Fraga, Anthony Lu, Nancy Gee, Michael S. Liu, Raymond W. Lev, Michael H. Brink, James A. Saini, Sanjay Lang, Min Succi, Marc D. Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effects of COVID‐19 on computed tomography (CT) imaging of cancer. METHODS: Cancer‐related CTs performed at one academic hospital and three affiliated community hospitals in Massachusetts were retrospectively analyzed. Three periods of 2020 were considered as follows: pre‐COVID‐19 (1/5/20–3/14/20), COVID‐19 peak (3/15/20–5/2/20), and post‐COVID‐19 peak (5/3/20–11/14/20). 15 March 2020 was the day a state of emergency was declared in MA; 3 May 2020 was the day our hospitals resumed to non‐urgent imaging. The volumes were assessed by (1) Imaging indication: cancer screening, initial workup, active cancer, and surveillance; (2) Care setting: outpatient and inpatient, ED; (3) Hospital type: quaternary academic center (QAC), university‐affiliated community hospital (UACH), and sole community hospitals (SCHs). RESULTS: During the COVID‐19 peak, a significant drop in CT volumes was observed (−42.2%, p < 0.0001), with cancer screening, initial workup, active cancer, and cancer surveillance declining by 81.7%, 54.8%, 30.7%, and 44.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001). In the post‐COVID‐19 peak period, cancer screening and initial workup CTs did not recover (−11.7%, p = 0.037; −20.0%, p = 0.031), especially in the outpatient setting. CT volumes for active cancer recovered, but inconsistently across hospital types: the QAC experienced a 9.4% decline (p = 0.022) and the UACH a 41.5% increase (p < 0.001). Outpatient CTs recovered after the COVID‐19 peak, but with a shift in utilization away from the QAC (−8.7%, p = 0.020) toward the UACH (+13.3%, p = 0.013). Inpatient and ED‐based oncologic CTs increased post‐peak (+20.0%, p = 0.004 and +33.2%, p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer imaging was severely impacted during the COVID‐19 pandemic. CTs for cancer screening and initial workup did not recover to pre‐COVID‐19 levels well into 2020, a finding that suggests more patients with advanced cancers may present in the future. A redistribution of imaging utilization away from the QAC and outpatient settings, toward the community hospitals and inpatient setting/ED was observed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8420511/ /pubmed/34355873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4183 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Zattra, Ottavia
Fraga, Anthony
Lu, Nancy
Gee, Michael S.
Liu, Raymond W.
Lev, Michael H.
Brink, James A.
Saini, Sanjay
Lang, Min
Succi, Marc D.
Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts
title Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts
title_full Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts
title_fullStr Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts
title_full_unstemmed Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts
title_short Trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the COVID‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in Massachusetts
title_sort trends in cancer imaging by indication, care setting, and hospital type during the covid‐19 pandemic and recovery at four hospitals in massachusetts
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420511/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34355873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4183
work_keys_str_mv AT zattraottavia trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts
AT fragaanthony trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts
AT lunancy trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts
AT geemichaels trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts
AT liuraymondw trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts
AT levmichaelh trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts
AT brinkjamesa trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts
AT sainisanjay trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts
AT langmin trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts
AT succimarcd trendsincancerimagingbyindicationcaresettingandhospitaltypeduringthecovid19pandemicandrecoveryatfourhospitalsinmassachusetts