Cargando…
Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction
In this work, the magnetic anisotropy in two iso-structural distorted tetrahedral Co(II) complexes, CoX (2)tmtu(2) [X = Cl(1) and Br(2), tmtu = tetramethylthiourea] is investigated, using a combination of polarized neutron diffraction (PND), very low-temperature high-resolution synchrotron X-ray...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Union of Crystallography
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252521008290 |
_version_ | 1783748945197924352 |
---|---|
author | Klahn, Emil Andreasen Damgaard-Møller, Emil Krause, Lennard Kibalin, Iurii Gukasov, Arsen Tripathi, Shalini Swain, Abinash Shanmugam, Maheswaran Overgaard, Jacob |
author_facet | Klahn, Emil Andreasen Damgaard-Møller, Emil Krause, Lennard Kibalin, Iurii Gukasov, Arsen Tripathi, Shalini Swain, Abinash Shanmugam, Maheswaran Overgaard, Jacob |
author_sort | Klahn, Emil Andreasen |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this work, the magnetic anisotropy in two iso-structural distorted tetrahedral Co(II) complexes, CoX (2)tmtu(2) [X = Cl(1) and Br(2), tmtu = tetramethylthiourea] is investigated, using a combination of polarized neutron diffraction (PND), very low-temperature high-resolution synchrotron X-ray diffraction and CASSCF/NEVPT2 ab initio calculations. Here, it was found consistently among all methods that the compounds have an easy axis of magnetization pointing nearly along the bisector of the compression angle, with minute deviations between PND and theory. Importantly, this work represents the first derivation of the atomic susceptibility tensor based on powder PND for a single-molecule magnet and the comparison thereof with ab initio calculations and high-resolution X-ray diffraction. Theoretical ab initio ligand field theory (AILFT) analysis finds the d (xy) orbital to be stabilized relative to the d (xz) and d (yz) orbitals, thus providing the intuitive explanation for the presence of a negative zero-field splitting parameter, D, from coupling and thus mixing of d (xy) and [Image: see text]. Experimental d-orbital populations support this interpretation, showing in addition that the metal–ligand covalency is larger for Br-ligated 2 than for Cl-ligated 1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8420765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | International Union of Crystallography |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84207652021-09-27 Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction Klahn, Emil Andreasen Damgaard-Møller, Emil Krause, Lennard Kibalin, Iurii Gukasov, Arsen Tripathi, Shalini Swain, Abinash Shanmugam, Maheswaran Overgaard, Jacob IUCrJ Research Papers In this work, the magnetic anisotropy in two iso-structural distorted tetrahedral Co(II) complexes, CoX (2)tmtu(2) [X = Cl(1) and Br(2), tmtu = tetramethylthiourea] is investigated, using a combination of polarized neutron diffraction (PND), very low-temperature high-resolution synchrotron X-ray diffraction and CASSCF/NEVPT2 ab initio calculations. Here, it was found consistently among all methods that the compounds have an easy axis of magnetization pointing nearly along the bisector of the compression angle, with minute deviations between PND and theory. Importantly, this work represents the first derivation of the atomic susceptibility tensor based on powder PND for a single-molecule magnet and the comparison thereof with ab initio calculations and high-resolution X-ray diffraction. Theoretical ab initio ligand field theory (AILFT) analysis finds the d (xy) orbital to be stabilized relative to the d (xz) and d (yz) orbitals, thus providing the intuitive explanation for the presence of a negative zero-field splitting parameter, D, from coupling and thus mixing of d (xy) and [Image: see text]. Experimental d-orbital populations support this interpretation, showing in addition that the metal–ligand covalency is larger for Br-ligated 2 than for Cl-ligated 1. International Union of Crystallography 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8420765/ /pubmed/34584744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252521008290 Text en © Emil Andreasen Klahn et al. 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Papers Klahn, Emil Andreasen Damgaard-Møller, Emil Krause, Lennard Kibalin, Iurii Gukasov, Arsen Tripathi, Shalini Swain, Abinash Shanmugam, Maheswaran Overgaard, Jacob Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction |
title | Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction |
title_full | Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction |
title_fullStr | Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction |
title_short | Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction |
title_sort | quantifying magnetic anisotropy using x-ray and neutron diffraction |
topic | Research Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252521008290 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klahnemilandreasen quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction AT damgaardmølleremil quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction AT krauselennard quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction AT kibaliniurii quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction AT gukasovarsen quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction AT tripathishalini quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction AT swainabinash quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction AT shanmugammaheswaran quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction AT overgaardjacob quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction |