Cargando…

Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction

In this work, the magnetic anisotropy in two iso-structural distorted tetrahedral Co(II) complexes, CoX (2)tmtu(2) [X = Cl(1) and Br(2), tmtu = tetra­methyl­thio­urea] is investigated, using a combination of polarized neutron diffraction (PND), very low-temperature high-resolution synchrotron X-ray...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klahn, Emil Andreasen, Damgaard-Møller, Emil, Krause, Lennard, Kibalin, Iurii, Gukasov, Arsen, Tripathi, Shalini, Swain, Abinash, Shanmugam, Maheswaran, Overgaard, Jacob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Union of Crystallography 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252521008290
_version_ 1783748945197924352
author Klahn, Emil Andreasen
Damgaard-Møller, Emil
Krause, Lennard
Kibalin, Iurii
Gukasov, Arsen
Tripathi, Shalini
Swain, Abinash
Shanmugam, Maheswaran
Overgaard, Jacob
author_facet Klahn, Emil Andreasen
Damgaard-Møller, Emil
Krause, Lennard
Kibalin, Iurii
Gukasov, Arsen
Tripathi, Shalini
Swain, Abinash
Shanmugam, Maheswaran
Overgaard, Jacob
author_sort Klahn, Emil Andreasen
collection PubMed
description In this work, the magnetic anisotropy in two iso-structural distorted tetrahedral Co(II) complexes, CoX (2)tmtu(2) [X = Cl(1) and Br(2), tmtu = tetra­methyl­thio­urea] is investigated, using a combination of polarized neutron diffraction (PND), very low-temperature high-resolution synchrotron X-ray diffraction and CASSCF/NEVPT2 ab initio calculations. Here, it was found consistently among all methods that the compounds have an easy axis of magnetization pointing nearly along the bis­ector of the compression angle, with minute deviations between PND and theory. Importantly, this work represents the first derivation of the atomic susceptibility tensor based on powder PND for a single-molecule magnet and the comparison thereof with ab initio calculations and high-resolution X-ray diffraction. Theoretical ab initio ligand field theory (AILFT) analysis finds the d (xy) orbital to be stabilized relative to the d (xz) and d (yz) orbitals, thus providing the intuitive explanation for the presence of a negative zero-field splitting parameter, D, from coupling and thus mixing of d (xy) and [Image: see text]. Experimental d-orbital populations support this interpretation, showing in addition that the metal–ligand covalency is larger for Br-ligated 2 than for Cl-ligated 1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8420765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher International Union of Crystallography
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84207652021-09-27 Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction Klahn, Emil Andreasen Damgaard-Møller, Emil Krause, Lennard Kibalin, Iurii Gukasov, Arsen Tripathi, Shalini Swain, Abinash Shanmugam, Maheswaran Overgaard, Jacob IUCrJ Research Papers In this work, the magnetic anisotropy in two iso-structural distorted tetrahedral Co(II) complexes, CoX (2)tmtu(2) [X = Cl(1) and Br(2), tmtu = tetra­methyl­thio­urea] is investigated, using a combination of polarized neutron diffraction (PND), very low-temperature high-resolution synchrotron X-ray diffraction and CASSCF/NEVPT2 ab initio calculations. Here, it was found consistently among all methods that the compounds have an easy axis of magnetization pointing nearly along the bis­ector of the compression angle, with minute deviations between PND and theory. Importantly, this work represents the first derivation of the atomic susceptibility tensor based on powder PND for a single-molecule magnet and the comparison thereof with ab initio calculations and high-resolution X-ray diffraction. Theoretical ab initio ligand field theory (AILFT) analysis finds the d (xy) orbital to be stabilized relative to the d (xz) and d (yz) orbitals, thus providing the intuitive explanation for the presence of a negative zero-field splitting parameter, D, from coupling and thus mixing of d (xy) and [Image: see text]. Experimental d-orbital populations support this interpretation, showing in addition that the metal–ligand covalency is larger for Br-ligated 2 than for Cl-ligated 1. International Union of Crystallography 2021-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8420765/ /pubmed/34584744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252521008290 Text en © Emil Andreasen Klahn et al. 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are cited.
spellingShingle Research Papers
Klahn, Emil Andreasen
Damgaard-Møller, Emil
Krause, Lennard
Kibalin, Iurii
Gukasov, Arsen
Tripathi, Shalini
Swain, Abinash
Shanmugam, Maheswaran
Overgaard, Jacob
Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction
title Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction
title_full Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction
title_fullStr Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction
title_short Quantifying magnetic anisotropy using X-ray and neutron diffraction
title_sort quantifying magnetic anisotropy using x-ray and neutron diffraction
topic Research Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34584744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S2052252521008290
work_keys_str_mv AT klahnemilandreasen quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction
AT damgaardmølleremil quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction
AT krauselennard quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction
AT kibaliniurii quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction
AT gukasovarsen quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction
AT tripathishalini quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction
AT swainabinash quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction
AT shanmugammaheswaran quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction
AT overgaardjacob quantifyingmagneticanisotropyusingxrayandneutrondiffraction