Cargando…

Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: End-user involvement in developing evidence-based tools for clinical practice may result in increased uptake and improved patient outcomes. Understanding end-user experiences and perceptions about the co-production of knowledge is useful to further the science of integrated knowledge tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verville, Leslie, Cancelliere, Carol, Connell, Gaelan, Lee, Joyce, Munce, Sarah, Mior, Silvano, Kay, Robin, Côté, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06955-7
_version_ 1783748962180661248
author Verville, Leslie
Cancelliere, Carol
Connell, Gaelan
Lee, Joyce
Munce, Sarah
Mior, Silvano
Kay, Robin
Côté, Pierre
author_facet Verville, Leslie
Cancelliere, Carol
Connell, Gaelan
Lee, Joyce
Munce, Sarah
Mior, Silvano
Kay, Robin
Côté, Pierre
author_sort Verville, Leslie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: End-user involvement in developing evidence-based tools for clinical practice may result in increased uptake and improved patient outcomes. Understanding end-user experiences and perceptions about the co-production of knowledge is useful to further the science of integrated knowledge translation (iKT) – a strategy for accelerating the uptake and impact of research. Our study had two main objectives: (1) explore end-user (clinician) experiences of co-producing an evidence-based practice tool; and (2) describe end-user perceptions in knowledge development. METHODS: We used a qualitative study design. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians and used a transcendental phenomenological approach to analyze themes/phenomena. In addition, we explored the interrelated themes between the thematic maps of each objective. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from clinicians’ experiences in co-producing the practice tool: ease/convenience of participating, need for support and encouragement, understanding the value of participating, and individual skillsets yield meaningful contributions. Stakeholder roles in knowledge tool development and improving dissemination of evidence and knowledge tools were themes that related to clinician perceptions in knowledge development. The review of interrelated thematic maps depicts an intertwined relationship between stakeholders and dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: End-users provide invaluable insight and perspective into the development of evidence-based clinical tools. Exploring the experiences and perceptions of end-users may support future research endeavours involving iKT, such as the co-production of clinical resources, potentially improving uptake and patient health outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06955-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8420847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84208472021-09-07 Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study Verville, Leslie Cancelliere, Carol Connell, Gaelan Lee, Joyce Munce, Sarah Mior, Silvano Kay, Robin Côté, Pierre BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: End-user involvement in developing evidence-based tools for clinical practice may result in increased uptake and improved patient outcomes. Understanding end-user experiences and perceptions about the co-production of knowledge is useful to further the science of integrated knowledge translation (iKT) – a strategy for accelerating the uptake and impact of research. Our study had two main objectives: (1) explore end-user (clinician) experiences of co-producing an evidence-based practice tool; and (2) describe end-user perceptions in knowledge development. METHODS: We used a qualitative study design. We conducted semi-structured interviews with clinicians and used a transcendental phenomenological approach to analyze themes/phenomena. In addition, we explored the interrelated themes between the thematic maps of each objective. RESULTS: Four themes emerged from clinicians’ experiences in co-producing the practice tool: ease/convenience of participating, need for support and encouragement, understanding the value of participating, and individual skillsets yield meaningful contributions. Stakeholder roles in knowledge tool development and improving dissemination of evidence and knowledge tools were themes that related to clinician perceptions in knowledge development. The review of interrelated thematic maps depicts an intertwined relationship between stakeholders and dissemination. CONCLUSIONS: End-users provide invaluable insight and perspective into the development of evidence-based clinical tools. Exploring the experiences and perceptions of end-users may support future research endeavours involving iKT, such as the co-production of clinical resources, potentially improving uptake and patient health outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-06955-7. BioMed Central 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8420847/ /pubmed/34488751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06955-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Verville, Leslie
Cancelliere, Carol
Connell, Gaelan
Lee, Joyce
Munce, Sarah
Mior, Silvano
Kay, Robin
Côté, Pierre
Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study
title Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study
title_full Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study
title_short Exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study
title_sort exploring clinicians’ experiences and perceptions of end-user roles in knowledge development: a qualitative study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34488751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06955-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vervilleleslie exploringcliniciansexperiencesandperceptionsofenduserrolesinknowledgedevelopmentaqualitativestudy
AT cancellierecarol exploringcliniciansexperiencesandperceptionsofenduserrolesinknowledgedevelopmentaqualitativestudy
AT connellgaelan exploringcliniciansexperiencesandperceptionsofenduserrolesinknowledgedevelopmentaqualitativestudy
AT leejoyce exploringcliniciansexperiencesandperceptionsofenduserrolesinknowledgedevelopmentaqualitativestudy
AT muncesarah exploringcliniciansexperiencesandperceptionsofenduserrolesinknowledgedevelopmentaqualitativestudy
AT miorsilvano exploringcliniciansexperiencesandperceptionsofenduserrolesinknowledgedevelopmentaqualitativestudy
AT kayrobin exploringcliniciansexperiencesandperceptionsofenduserrolesinknowledgedevelopmentaqualitativestudy
AT cotepierre exploringcliniciansexperiencesandperceptionsofenduserrolesinknowledgedevelopmentaqualitativestudy