Cargando…

Barriers in Nursing Practice in Cancer Cachexia: A Scoping Review

This scoping review aims to identify the barriers in practice and clinical trials for oncology nurses in cancer cachexia. We used the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Studies written i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sato, Rika, Naito, Tateaki, Hayashi, Naoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon-2152
_version_ 1783748976236822528
author Sato, Rika
Naito, Tateaki
Hayashi, Naoko
author_facet Sato, Rika
Naito, Tateaki
Hayashi, Naoko
author_sort Sato, Rika
collection PubMed
description This scoping review aims to identify the barriers in practice and clinical trials for oncology nurses in cancer cachexia. We used the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Studies written in English and published between 2008 and 2021 were retrieved from five databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. A total of 1075 studies were identified, and 34 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility by three researchers. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. This review revealed several barriers to nursing practice and clinical trials in cancer cachexia. First, health-care professionals, including nurses, faced individual barriers (insufficient understanding and skills for diagnosis and management) and environmental barriers (lack of standardized screening tools or treatment options, difficulties in collaboration with other professions, and limited human resources) in practice. Second, studies on nurse-led interventions for cancer cachexia were relatively few and different in objectives, making it challenging to integrate the outcomes. Finally, there were no established educational programs for nurses that explicitly focused on cancer cachexia. This scoping review revealed individual and environmental barriers in nursing practice. In addition, there have relatively few clinical trials involving oncology nurses in cancer cachexia. Continuing education for nurses should cover cancer cachexia to improve the quality of oncology care in the future. It is also necessary to standardize practical assessment tools that are easy to assess daily and lead to interventions and develop nurse-led multidisciplinary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8420920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84209202021-09-14 Barriers in Nursing Practice in Cancer Cachexia: A Scoping Review Sato, Rika Naito, Tateaki Hayashi, Naoko Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs Review Article This scoping review aims to identify the barriers in practice and clinical trials for oncology nurses in cancer cachexia. We used the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. Studies written in English and published between 2008 and 2021 were retrieved from five databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. A total of 1075 studies were identified, and 34 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility by three researchers. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. This review revealed several barriers to nursing practice and clinical trials in cancer cachexia. First, health-care professionals, including nurses, faced individual barriers (insufficient understanding and skills for diagnosis and management) and environmental barriers (lack of standardized screening tools or treatment options, difficulties in collaboration with other professions, and limited human resources) in practice. Second, studies on nurse-led interventions for cancer cachexia were relatively few and different in objectives, making it challenging to integrate the outcomes. Finally, there were no established educational programs for nurses that explicitly focused on cancer cachexia. This scoping review revealed individual and environmental barriers in nursing practice. In addition, there have relatively few clinical trials involving oncology nurses in cancer cachexia. Continuing education for nurses should cover cancer cachexia to improve the quality of oncology care in the future. It is also necessary to standardize practical assessment tools that are easy to assess daily and lead to interventions and develop nurse-led multidisciplinary care. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8420920/ /pubmed/34527779 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon-2152 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Ann & Joshua Medical Publishing Co. Ltd https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sato, Rika
Naito, Tateaki
Hayashi, Naoko
Barriers in Nursing Practice in Cancer Cachexia: A Scoping Review
title Barriers in Nursing Practice in Cancer Cachexia: A Scoping Review
title_full Barriers in Nursing Practice in Cancer Cachexia: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Barriers in Nursing Practice in Cancer Cachexia: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Barriers in Nursing Practice in Cancer Cachexia: A Scoping Review
title_short Barriers in Nursing Practice in Cancer Cachexia: A Scoping Review
title_sort barriers in nursing practice in cancer cachexia: a scoping review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34527779
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/apjon.apjon-2152
work_keys_str_mv AT satorika barriersinnursingpracticeincancercachexiaascopingreview
AT naitotateaki barriersinnursingpracticeincancercachexiaascopingreview
AT hayashinaoko barriersinnursingpracticeincancercachexiaascopingreview