Cargando…

Paying Americans to take the vaccine—would it help or backfire?

This research investigates the extent to which financial incentives (conditional cash transfers) would induce Americans to opt for vaccination against coronavirus disease of 2019. We performed a randomized survey experiment with a representative sample of 1000 American adults in December 2020. Respo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robertson, Christopher, Scheitrum, Daniel, Schaefer, Aleks, Malone, Trey, McFadden, Brandon R, Messer, Kent D, Ferraro, Paul J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab027
_version_ 1783748980509769728
author Robertson, Christopher
Scheitrum, Daniel
Schaefer, Aleks
Malone, Trey
McFadden, Brandon R
Messer, Kent D
Ferraro, Paul J
author_facet Robertson, Christopher
Scheitrum, Daniel
Schaefer, Aleks
Malone, Trey
McFadden, Brandon R
Messer, Kent D
Ferraro, Paul J
author_sort Robertson, Christopher
collection PubMed
description This research investigates the extent to which financial incentives (conditional cash transfers) would induce Americans to opt for vaccination against coronavirus disease of 2019. We performed a randomized survey experiment with a representative sample of 1000 American adults in December 2020. Respondents were asked whether they would opt for vaccination under one of three incentive conditions ($1000, $1500, or $2000 financial incentive) or a no-incentive condition. We find that—without coupled financial incentives—only 58 per cent of survey respondents would elect for vaccination. A coupled financial incentive yields an 8-percentage-point increase in vaccine uptake relative to this baseline. The size of the cash transfer does not dramatically affect uptake rates. However, incentive responses differ dramatically by demographic group. Republicans were less responsive to financial incentives than the general population. For Black and Latino Americans especially, very large financial incentives may be counter-productive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8420956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84209562021-09-09 Paying Americans to take the vaccine—would it help or backfire? Robertson, Christopher Scheitrum, Daniel Schaefer, Aleks Malone, Trey McFadden, Brandon R Messer, Kent D Ferraro, Paul J J Law Biosci Essay This research investigates the extent to which financial incentives (conditional cash transfers) would induce Americans to opt for vaccination against coronavirus disease of 2019. We performed a randomized survey experiment with a representative sample of 1000 American adults in December 2020. Respondents were asked whether they would opt for vaccination under one of three incentive conditions ($1000, $1500, or $2000 financial incentive) or a no-incentive condition. We find that—without coupled financial incentives—only 58 per cent of survey respondents would elect for vaccination. A coupled financial incentive yields an 8-percentage-point increase in vaccine uptake relative to this baseline. The size of the cash transfer does not dramatically affect uptake rates. However, incentive responses differ dramatically by demographic group. Republicans were less responsive to financial incentives than the general population. For Black and Latino Americans especially, very large financial incentives may be counter-productive. Oxford University Press 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8420956/ /pubmed/34512996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab027 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Essay
Robertson, Christopher
Scheitrum, Daniel
Schaefer, Aleks
Malone, Trey
McFadden, Brandon R
Messer, Kent D
Ferraro, Paul J
Paying Americans to take the vaccine—would it help or backfire?
title Paying Americans to take the vaccine—would it help or backfire?
title_full Paying Americans to take the vaccine—would it help or backfire?
title_fullStr Paying Americans to take the vaccine—would it help or backfire?
title_full_unstemmed Paying Americans to take the vaccine—would it help or backfire?
title_short Paying Americans to take the vaccine—would it help or backfire?
title_sort paying americans to take the vaccine—would it help or backfire?
topic Essay
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8420956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsab027
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsonchristopher payingamericanstotakethevaccinewouldithelporbackfire
AT scheitrumdaniel payingamericanstotakethevaccinewouldithelporbackfire
AT schaeferaleks payingamericanstotakethevaccinewouldithelporbackfire
AT malonetrey payingamericanstotakethevaccinewouldithelporbackfire
AT mcfaddenbrandonr payingamericanstotakethevaccinewouldithelporbackfire
AT messerkentd payingamericanstotakethevaccinewouldithelporbackfire
AT ferraropaulj payingamericanstotakethevaccinewouldithelporbackfire