Cargando…

Interpretation of Electrocardiogram Heartbeat by CNN and GRU

The diagnosis of electrocardiogram (ECG) is extremely onerous and inefficient, so it is necessary to use a computer-aided diagnosis of ECG signals. However, it is still a challenging problem to design high-accuracy ECG algorithms suitable for the medical field. In this paper, a classification method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yao, Guoliang, Mao, Xiaobo, Li, Nan, Xu, Huaxing, Xu, Xiangyang, Jiao, Yi, Ni, Jinhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6534942
_version_ 1783749018329808896
author Yao, Guoliang
Mao, Xiaobo
Li, Nan
Xu, Huaxing
Xu, Xiangyang
Jiao, Yi
Ni, Jinhong
author_facet Yao, Guoliang
Mao, Xiaobo
Li, Nan
Xu, Huaxing
Xu, Xiangyang
Jiao, Yi
Ni, Jinhong
author_sort Yao, Guoliang
collection PubMed
description The diagnosis of electrocardiogram (ECG) is extremely onerous and inefficient, so it is necessary to use a computer-aided diagnosis of ECG signals. However, it is still a challenging problem to design high-accuracy ECG algorithms suitable for the medical field. In this paper, a classification method is proposed to classify ECG signals. Firstly, wavelet transform is used to denoise the original data, and data enhancement technology is used to overcome the problem of an unbalanced dataset. Secondly, an integrated convolutional neural network (CNN) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) classifier is proposed. The proposed network consists of a convolution layer, followed by 6 local feature extraction modules (LFEM), a GRU, and a Dense layer and a Softmax layer. Finally, the processed data were input into the CNN-GRU network into five categories: nonectopic beats, supraventricular ectopic beats, ventricular ectopic beats, fusion beats, and unknown beats. The MIT-BIH arrhythmia database was used to evaluate the approach, and the average sensitivity, accuracy, and F1-score of the network for 5 types of ECG were 99.33%, 99.61%, and 99.42%. The evaluation criteria of the proposed method are superior to other state-of-the-art methods, and this model can be applied to wearable devices to achieve high-precision monitoring of ECG.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8421156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84211562021-09-07 Interpretation of Electrocardiogram Heartbeat by CNN and GRU Yao, Guoliang Mao, Xiaobo Li, Nan Xu, Huaxing Xu, Xiangyang Jiao, Yi Ni, Jinhong Comput Math Methods Med Research Article The diagnosis of electrocardiogram (ECG) is extremely onerous and inefficient, so it is necessary to use a computer-aided diagnosis of ECG signals. However, it is still a challenging problem to design high-accuracy ECG algorithms suitable for the medical field. In this paper, a classification method is proposed to classify ECG signals. Firstly, wavelet transform is used to denoise the original data, and data enhancement technology is used to overcome the problem of an unbalanced dataset. Secondly, an integrated convolutional neural network (CNN) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) classifier is proposed. The proposed network consists of a convolution layer, followed by 6 local feature extraction modules (LFEM), a GRU, and a Dense layer and a Softmax layer. Finally, the processed data were input into the CNN-GRU network into five categories: nonectopic beats, supraventricular ectopic beats, ventricular ectopic beats, fusion beats, and unknown beats. The MIT-BIH arrhythmia database was used to evaluate the approach, and the average sensitivity, accuracy, and F1-score of the network for 5 types of ECG were 99.33%, 99.61%, and 99.42%. The evaluation criteria of the proposed method are superior to other state-of-the-art methods, and this model can be applied to wearable devices to achieve high-precision monitoring of ECG. Hindawi 2021-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8421156/ /pubmed/34497664 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6534942 Text en Copyright © 2021 Guoliang Yao et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yao, Guoliang
Mao, Xiaobo
Li, Nan
Xu, Huaxing
Xu, Xiangyang
Jiao, Yi
Ni, Jinhong
Interpretation of Electrocardiogram Heartbeat by CNN and GRU
title Interpretation of Electrocardiogram Heartbeat by CNN and GRU
title_full Interpretation of Electrocardiogram Heartbeat by CNN and GRU
title_fullStr Interpretation of Electrocardiogram Heartbeat by CNN and GRU
title_full_unstemmed Interpretation of Electrocardiogram Heartbeat by CNN and GRU
title_short Interpretation of Electrocardiogram Heartbeat by CNN and GRU
title_sort interpretation of electrocardiogram heartbeat by cnn and gru
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497664
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6534942
work_keys_str_mv AT yaoguoliang interpretationofelectrocardiogramheartbeatbycnnandgru
AT maoxiaobo interpretationofelectrocardiogramheartbeatbycnnandgru
AT linan interpretationofelectrocardiogramheartbeatbycnnandgru
AT xuhuaxing interpretationofelectrocardiogramheartbeatbycnnandgru
AT xuxiangyang interpretationofelectrocardiogramheartbeatbycnnandgru
AT jiaoyi interpretationofelectrocardiogramheartbeatbycnnandgru
AT nijinhong interpretationofelectrocardiogramheartbeatbycnnandgru