Cargando…

Clinical Validation of a 3-Dimensional Ultrafast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Protocol Including Single Breath-Hold 3-Dimensional Sequences

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to clinically validate a novel 3-dimensional (3D) ultrafast cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol including cine (anatomy and function) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), each in a single breath-hold. BACKGROUND: CMR is the reference tool for cardiac imaging but...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gómez-Talavera, Sandra, Fernandez-Jimenez, Rodrigo, Fuster, Valentín, Nothnagel, Nils D., Kouwenhoven, Marc, Clemence, Matthew, García-Lunar, Inés, Gómez-Rubín, María C., Navarro, Felipe, Pérez-Asenjo, Braulio, Fernández-Friera, Leticia, Calero, María J., Orejas, Miguel, Cabrera, José A., Desco, Manuel, Pizarro, Gonzalo, Ibáñez, Borja, Sánchez-González, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33865783
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.02.031
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: This study sought to clinically validate a novel 3-dimensional (3D) ultrafast cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol including cine (anatomy and function) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), each in a single breath-hold. BACKGROUND: CMR is the reference tool for cardiac imaging but is time-consuming. METHODS: A protocol comprising isotropic 3D cine (Enhanced sensitivity encoding [SENSE] by Static Outer volume Subtraction [ESSOS]) and isotropic 3D LGE sequences was compared with a standard cine+LGE protocol in a prospective study of 107 patients (age 58 ± 11 years; 24% female). Left ventricular (LV) mass, volumes, and LV and right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (LVEF, RVEF) were assessed by 3D ESSOS and 2D cine CMR. LGE (% LV) was assessed using 3D and 2D sequences. RESULTS: Three-dimensional and LGE acquisitions lasted 24 and 22 s, respectively. Three-dimensional and LGE images were of good quality and allowed quantification in all cases. Mean LVEF by 3D and 2D CMR were 51 ± 12% and 52 ± 12%, respectively, with excellent intermethod agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94 to 0.97) and insignificant bias. Mean RVEF 3D and 2D CMR were 60.4 ± 5.4% and 59.7 ± 5.2%, respectively, with acceptable intermethod agreement (ICC: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.81) and insignificant bias. Both 2D and 3D LGE showed excellent agreement, and intraobserver and interobserver agreement were excellent for 3D LGE. CONCLUSIONS: ESSOS single breath-hold 3D CMR allows accurate assessment of heart anatomy and function. Combining ESSOS with 3D LGE allows complete cardiac examination in <1 min of acquisition time. This protocol expands the indication for CMR, reduces costs, and increases patient comfort.