Cargando…

Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm

Significance: Optical microscopy is characterized by the ability to get high resolution, below [Formula: see text] , high contrast, functional and quantitative images. The use of shaped illumination, such as with lightsheet microscopy, has led to greater three-dimensional isotropic resolution with l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMillan, Lewis, Reidt, Sascha, McNicol, Cameron, Barnard, Isla R. M., MacDonald, Michael, Brown, Christian T. A., Wood, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.096004
Descripción
Sumario:Significance: Optical microscopy is characterized by the ability to get high resolution, below [Formula: see text] , high contrast, functional and quantitative images. The use of shaped illumination, such as with lightsheet microscopy, has led to greater three-dimensional isotropic resolution with low phototoxicity. However, in most complex samples and tissues, optical imaging is limited by scattering. Many solutions to this issue have been proposed, from using passive approaches such as Bessel beam illumination to active methods incorporating aberration correction, but making fair comparisons between different approaches has proven to be challenging. Aim: We present a phase-encoded Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm ([Formula: see text]) capable of comparing the merits of different illumination strategies or predicting the performance of an individual approach. Approach: We show that [Formula: see text] is capable of modeling interference phenomena such as Gaussian or Bessel beams and compare the model with experiment. Results: Using this verified model, we show that, for a sample with homogeneously distributed scatterers, there is no inherent advantage to illuminating a sample with a conical wave (Bessel beam) instead of a spherical wave (Gaussian beam), except for maintaining a greater depth of focus. Conclusion: [Formula: see text] is adaptable to any illumination geometry, sample property, or beam type (such as fractal or layered scatterer distribution) and as such provides a powerful predictive tool for optical imaging in thick samples.