Cargando…
Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm
Significance: Optical microscopy is characterized by the ability to get high resolution, below [Formula: see text] , high contrast, functional and quantitative images. The use of shaped illumination, such as with lightsheet microscopy, has led to greater three-dimensional isotropic resolution with l...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.096004 |
_version_ | 1783749069412237312 |
---|---|
author | McMillan, Lewis Reidt, Sascha McNicol, Cameron Barnard, Isla R. M. MacDonald, Michael Brown, Christian T. A. Wood, Kenneth |
author_facet | McMillan, Lewis Reidt, Sascha McNicol, Cameron Barnard, Isla R. M. MacDonald, Michael Brown, Christian T. A. Wood, Kenneth |
author_sort | McMillan, Lewis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Significance: Optical microscopy is characterized by the ability to get high resolution, below [Formula: see text] , high contrast, functional and quantitative images. The use of shaped illumination, such as with lightsheet microscopy, has led to greater three-dimensional isotropic resolution with low phototoxicity. However, in most complex samples and tissues, optical imaging is limited by scattering. Many solutions to this issue have been proposed, from using passive approaches such as Bessel beam illumination to active methods incorporating aberration correction, but making fair comparisons between different approaches has proven to be challenging. Aim: We present a phase-encoded Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm ([Formula: see text]) capable of comparing the merits of different illumination strategies or predicting the performance of an individual approach. Approach: We show that [Formula: see text] is capable of modeling interference phenomena such as Gaussian or Bessel beams and compare the model with experiment. Results: Using this verified model, we show that, for a sample with homogeneously distributed scatterers, there is no inherent advantage to illuminating a sample with a conical wave (Bessel beam) instead of a spherical wave (Gaussian beam), except for maintaining a greater depth of focus. Conclusion: [Formula: see text] is adaptable to any illumination geometry, sample property, or beam type (such as fractal or layered scatterer distribution) and as such provides a powerful predictive tool for optical imaging in thick samples. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8421375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84213752021-09-09 Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm McMillan, Lewis Reidt, Sascha McNicol, Cameron Barnard, Isla R. M. MacDonald, Michael Brown, Christian T. A. Wood, Kenneth J Biomed Opt Imaging Significance: Optical microscopy is characterized by the ability to get high resolution, below [Formula: see text] , high contrast, functional and quantitative images. The use of shaped illumination, such as with lightsheet microscopy, has led to greater three-dimensional isotropic resolution with low phototoxicity. However, in most complex samples and tissues, optical imaging is limited by scattering. Many solutions to this issue have been proposed, from using passive approaches such as Bessel beam illumination to active methods incorporating aberration correction, but making fair comparisons between different approaches has proven to be challenging. Aim: We present a phase-encoded Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm ([Formula: see text]) capable of comparing the merits of different illumination strategies or predicting the performance of an individual approach. Approach: We show that [Formula: see text] is capable of modeling interference phenomena such as Gaussian or Bessel beams and compare the model with experiment. Results: Using this verified model, we show that, for a sample with homogeneously distributed scatterers, there is no inherent advantage to illuminating a sample with a conical wave (Bessel beam) instead of a spherical wave (Gaussian beam), except for maintaining a greater depth of focus. Conclusion: [Formula: see text] is adaptable to any illumination geometry, sample property, or beam type (such as fractal or layered scatterer distribution) and as such provides a powerful predictive tool for optical imaging in thick samples. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2021-09-07 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8421375/ /pubmed/34490761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.096004 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI. |
spellingShingle | Imaging McMillan, Lewis Reidt, Sascha McNicol, Cameron Barnard, Isla R. M. MacDonald, Michael Brown, Christian T. A. Wood, Kenneth Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm |
title | Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm |
title_full | Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm |
title_fullStr | Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm |
title_short | Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm |
title_sort | imaging in thick samples, a phased monte carlo radiation transfer algorithm |
topic | Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.096004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcmillanlewis imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm AT reidtsascha imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm AT mcnicolcameron imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm AT barnardislarm imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm AT macdonaldmichael imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm AT brownchristianta imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm AT woodkenneth imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm |