Cargando…

Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm

Significance: Optical microscopy is characterized by the ability to get high resolution, below [Formula: see text] , high contrast, functional and quantitative images. The use of shaped illumination, such as with lightsheet microscopy, has led to greater three-dimensional isotropic resolution with l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMillan, Lewis, Reidt, Sascha, McNicol, Cameron, Barnard, Isla R. M., MacDonald, Michael, Brown, Christian T. A., Wood, Kenneth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.096004
_version_ 1783749069412237312
author McMillan, Lewis
Reidt, Sascha
McNicol, Cameron
Barnard, Isla R. M.
MacDonald, Michael
Brown, Christian T. A.
Wood, Kenneth
author_facet McMillan, Lewis
Reidt, Sascha
McNicol, Cameron
Barnard, Isla R. M.
MacDonald, Michael
Brown, Christian T. A.
Wood, Kenneth
author_sort McMillan, Lewis
collection PubMed
description Significance: Optical microscopy is characterized by the ability to get high resolution, below [Formula: see text] , high contrast, functional and quantitative images. The use of shaped illumination, such as with lightsheet microscopy, has led to greater three-dimensional isotropic resolution with low phototoxicity. However, in most complex samples and tissues, optical imaging is limited by scattering. Many solutions to this issue have been proposed, from using passive approaches such as Bessel beam illumination to active methods incorporating aberration correction, but making fair comparisons between different approaches has proven to be challenging. Aim: We present a phase-encoded Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm ([Formula: see text]) capable of comparing the merits of different illumination strategies or predicting the performance of an individual approach. Approach: We show that [Formula: see text] is capable of modeling interference phenomena such as Gaussian or Bessel beams and compare the model with experiment. Results: Using this verified model, we show that, for a sample with homogeneously distributed scatterers, there is no inherent advantage to illuminating a sample with a conical wave (Bessel beam) instead of a spherical wave (Gaussian beam), except for maintaining a greater depth of focus. Conclusion: [Formula: see text] is adaptable to any illumination geometry, sample property, or beam type (such as fractal or layered scatterer distribution) and as such provides a powerful predictive tool for optical imaging in thick samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8421375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84213752021-09-09 Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm McMillan, Lewis Reidt, Sascha McNicol, Cameron Barnard, Isla R. M. MacDonald, Michael Brown, Christian T. A. Wood, Kenneth J Biomed Opt Imaging Significance: Optical microscopy is characterized by the ability to get high resolution, below [Formula: see text] , high contrast, functional and quantitative images. The use of shaped illumination, such as with lightsheet microscopy, has led to greater three-dimensional isotropic resolution with low phototoxicity. However, in most complex samples and tissues, optical imaging is limited by scattering. Many solutions to this issue have been proposed, from using passive approaches such as Bessel beam illumination to active methods incorporating aberration correction, but making fair comparisons between different approaches has proven to be challenging. Aim: We present a phase-encoded Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm ([Formula: see text]) capable of comparing the merits of different illumination strategies or predicting the performance of an individual approach. Approach: We show that [Formula: see text] is capable of modeling interference phenomena such as Gaussian or Bessel beams and compare the model with experiment. Results: Using this verified model, we show that, for a sample with homogeneously distributed scatterers, there is no inherent advantage to illuminating a sample with a conical wave (Bessel beam) instead of a spherical wave (Gaussian beam), except for maintaining a greater depth of focus. Conclusion: [Formula: see text] is adaptable to any illumination geometry, sample property, or beam type (such as fractal or layered scatterer distribution) and as such provides a powerful predictive tool for optical imaging in thick samples. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 2021-09-07 2021-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8421375/ /pubmed/34490761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.096004 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
spellingShingle Imaging
McMillan, Lewis
Reidt, Sascha
McNicol, Cameron
Barnard, Isla R. M.
MacDonald, Michael
Brown, Christian T. A.
Wood, Kenneth
Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm
title Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm
title_full Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm
title_fullStr Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm
title_short Imaging in thick samples, a phased Monte Carlo radiation transfer algorithm
title_sort imaging in thick samples, a phased monte carlo radiation transfer algorithm
topic Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.9.096004
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmillanlewis imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm
AT reidtsascha imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm
AT mcnicolcameron imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm
AT barnardislarm imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm
AT macdonaldmichael imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm
AT brownchristianta imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm
AT woodkenneth imaginginthicksamplesaphasedmontecarloradiationtransferalgorithm