Cargando…

Retrospective Comparison of Intraoperative Parameters, Efficacy and Safety in Cataract Surgery Between Halogen and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Illuminated Surgical Microscope

PURPOSE: The objective was to compare the operative time, ultrasound time, efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification with IOL insertion between using halogen and light-emitting diode (LED) illuminated microscope. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-seven surgical charts of cataract patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Tangjanyatam, Sagol
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511876
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S328450
_version_ 1783749158363987968
author Tangjanyatam, Sagol
author_facet Tangjanyatam, Sagol
author_sort Tangjanyatam, Sagol
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective was to compare the operative time, ultrasound time, efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification with IOL insertion between using halogen and light-emitting diode (LED) illuminated microscope. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-seven surgical charts of cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL insertion between June 2018 and October 2020 were reviewed. There were 113 cases operated on under halogen-illuminated microscope (Carl Zeiss OPMI LUMERA S7(®)) and 114 cases operated on under light-emitting diode (LED)-illuminated microscope (Leica PROVEO 8(®)). All cases were operated on by the same surgeon (S.T.). The difference in operative time and ultrasound time between two groups was compared by independent samples t-test. The proportion of cases with 3-months BCVA that was better than 20/30 and the proportion of cases with intraoperative complications from the operation between two groups were compared by Pearson’s Chi-squared test. RESULTS: The mean ultrasound time was 121.29±53.60 seconds in halogen group and 123.98±61.53 seconds in LED group. The mean difference was −2.69±8.44 seconds which was not statistically significant (95% CI, −19.35 to 13.97; p=0.573). The mean operative time was 19.83±4.77 minutes in the halogen group and 17.20±3.02 minutes in the LED group. The mean difference was 2.63±0.53 minutes (95% CI, 1.59 to 3.67; p < 0.001). The cases with BCVA better than 20/30 was 93.69% in halogen group and 95.49% in LED group. The proportion of cases with intraoperative complications was 3.53% in halogen group and 2.63% in LED group. The difference of both proportions was not statistically significant (p=0.553 and p=0.692, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study shows statistically significant operative time reduction with LED microscope. This evidence could be used for making the decision to switch from halogen microscope to LED microscope. Upgrading to LED-illuminated microscope might be beneficial for productivity improvement if there were at least six to seven cases operated on per day. The ultrasound time, efficacy, and safety showed no significant difference.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8421779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84217792021-09-09 Retrospective Comparison of Intraoperative Parameters, Efficacy and Safety in Cataract Surgery Between Halogen and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Illuminated Surgical Microscope Tangjanyatam, Sagol Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: The objective was to compare the operative time, ultrasound time, efficacy and safety of phacoemulsification with IOL insertion between using halogen and light-emitting diode (LED) illuminated microscope. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-seven surgical charts of cataract patients who underwent phacoemulsification with IOL insertion between June 2018 and October 2020 were reviewed. There were 113 cases operated on under halogen-illuminated microscope (Carl Zeiss OPMI LUMERA S7(®)) and 114 cases operated on under light-emitting diode (LED)-illuminated microscope (Leica PROVEO 8(®)). All cases were operated on by the same surgeon (S.T.). The difference in operative time and ultrasound time between two groups was compared by independent samples t-test. The proportion of cases with 3-months BCVA that was better than 20/30 and the proportion of cases with intraoperative complications from the operation between two groups were compared by Pearson’s Chi-squared test. RESULTS: The mean ultrasound time was 121.29±53.60 seconds in halogen group and 123.98±61.53 seconds in LED group. The mean difference was −2.69±8.44 seconds which was not statistically significant (95% CI, −19.35 to 13.97; p=0.573). The mean operative time was 19.83±4.77 minutes in the halogen group and 17.20±3.02 minutes in the LED group. The mean difference was 2.63±0.53 minutes (95% CI, 1.59 to 3.67; p < 0.001). The cases with BCVA better than 20/30 was 93.69% in halogen group and 95.49% in LED group. The proportion of cases with intraoperative complications was 3.53% in halogen group and 2.63% in LED group. The difference of both proportions was not statistically significant (p=0.553 and p=0.692, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study shows statistically significant operative time reduction with LED microscope. This evidence could be used for making the decision to switch from halogen microscope to LED microscope. Upgrading to LED-illuminated microscope might be beneficial for productivity improvement if there were at least six to seven cases operated on per day. The ultrasound time, efficacy, and safety showed no significant difference. Dove 2021-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8421779/ /pubmed/34511876 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S328450 Text en © 2021 Tangjanyatam. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Tangjanyatam, Sagol
Retrospective Comparison of Intraoperative Parameters, Efficacy and Safety in Cataract Surgery Between Halogen and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Illuminated Surgical Microscope
title Retrospective Comparison of Intraoperative Parameters, Efficacy and Safety in Cataract Surgery Between Halogen and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Illuminated Surgical Microscope
title_full Retrospective Comparison of Intraoperative Parameters, Efficacy and Safety in Cataract Surgery Between Halogen and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Illuminated Surgical Microscope
title_fullStr Retrospective Comparison of Intraoperative Parameters, Efficacy and Safety in Cataract Surgery Between Halogen and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Illuminated Surgical Microscope
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Comparison of Intraoperative Parameters, Efficacy and Safety in Cataract Surgery Between Halogen and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Illuminated Surgical Microscope
title_short Retrospective Comparison of Intraoperative Parameters, Efficacy and Safety in Cataract Surgery Between Halogen and Light-Emitting Diode (LED) Illuminated Surgical Microscope
title_sort retrospective comparison of intraoperative parameters, efficacy and safety in cataract surgery between halogen and light-emitting diode (led) illuminated surgical microscope
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8421779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34511876
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S328450
work_keys_str_mv AT tangjanyatamsagol retrospectivecomparisonofintraoperativeparametersefficacyandsafetyincataractsurgerybetweenhalogenandlightemittingdiodeledilluminatedsurgicalmicroscope