Cargando…

Insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women in the Netherlands: an in-depth qualitative exploration

OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women. DESIGN, METHOD, PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A qualitative interview study was conducted among 23 pregnant and postpartum vulnerable women in the Netherlands, following a grounded theo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laureij, Lyzette T, van der Hulst, Marije, Lagendijk, Jacqueline, Been, Jasper V, Ernst-Smelt, Hiske E, Franx, Arie, Lugtenberg, Marjolein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046696
_version_ 1783749259706761216
author Laureij, Lyzette T
van der Hulst, Marije
Lagendijk, Jacqueline
Been, Jasper V
Ernst-Smelt, Hiske E
Franx, Arie
Lugtenberg, Marjolein
author_facet Laureij, Lyzette T
van der Hulst, Marije
Lagendijk, Jacqueline
Been, Jasper V
Ernst-Smelt, Hiske E
Franx, Arie
Lugtenberg, Marjolein
author_sort Laureij, Lyzette T
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women. DESIGN, METHOD, PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A qualitative interview study was conducted among 23 pregnant and postpartum vulnerable women in the Netherlands, following a grounded theory approach. Women were determined as vulnerable by their healthcare providers. Theoretical sampling of participants was applied and was alternated by data analysis to include information-rich cases until saturation was achieved. RESULTS: A conceptual framework of postpartum care utilisation was generated consisting of three phases: pregnancy, early postpartum period and late postpartum period. Within these phases, information provision, parenting self-efficacy and social network were identified as overarching themes. Perceived inadequate information on content of postpartum care posed a major barrier to forming realistic expectations during pregnancy and hindered its utilisation. Low self-efficacy facilitated postpartum care utilisation. All women experienced increased self-efficacy during and after postpartum care. Support from a social network influenced expectations regarding the added value of postpartum care during pregnancy, and lowered actual utilisation during the postpartum period. The costs of postpartum care and the role of the maternity care assistant acted as general barriers or facilitators influencing the three overarching themes and therefore postpartum care utilisation indirectly. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that postpartum care utilisation among vulnerable women may be improved by considering the particular phase and relevant themes applying to individual women, and adapt care accordingly. We recommend to provide comprehensive, understandable information and to emphasise the gains of postpartum care in improving self-efficacy for vulnerable women. Moreover, involving a woman’s social network in postpartum care may add value to this care for this population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8422309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84223092021-09-22 Insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women in the Netherlands: an in-depth qualitative exploration Laureij, Lyzette T van der Hulst, Marije Lagendijk, Jacqueline Been, Jasper V Ernst-Smelt, Hiske E Franx, Arie Lugtenberg, Marjolein BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVE: To gain insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women. DESIGN, METHOD, PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: A qualitative interview study was conducted among 23 pregnant and postpartum vulnerable women in the Netherlands, following a grounded theory approach. Women were determined as vulnerable by their healthcare providers. Theoretical sampling of participants was applied and was alternated by data analysis to include information-rich cases until saturation was achieved. RESULTS: A conceptual framework of postpartum care utilisation was generated consisting of three phases: pregnancy, early postpartum period and late postpartum period. Within these phases, information provision, parenting self-efficacy and social network were identified as overarching themes. Perceived inadequate information on content of postpartum care posed a major barrier to forming realistic expectations during pregnancy and hindered its utilisation. Low self-efficacy facilitated postpartum care utilisation. All women experienced increased self-efficacy during and after postpartum care. Support from a social network influenced expectations regarding the added value of postpartum care during pregnancy, and lowered actual utilisation during the postpartum period. The costs of postpartum care and the role of the maternity care assistant acted as general barriers or facilitators influencing the three overarching themes and therefore postpartum care utilisation indirectly. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that postpartum care utilisation among vulnerable women may be improved by considering the particular phase and relevant themes applying to individual women, and adapt care accordingly. We recommend to provide comprehensive, understandable information and to emphasise the gains of postpartum care in improving self-efficacy for vulnerable women. Moreover, involving a woman’s social network in postpartum care may add value to this care for this population. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8422309/ /pubmed/34489272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046696 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Laureij, Lyzette T
van der Hulst, Marije
Lagendijk, Jacqueline
Been, Jasper V
Ernst-Smelt, Hiske E
Franx, Arie
Lugtenberg, Marjolein
Insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women in the Netherlands: an in-depth qualitative exploration
title Insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women in the Netherlands: an in-depth qualitative exploration
title_full Insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women in the Netherlands: an in-depth qualitative exploration
title_fullStr Insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women in the Netherlands: an in-depth qualitative exploration
title_full_unstemmed Insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women in the Netherlands: an in-depth qualitative exploration
title_short Insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women in the Netherlands: an in-depth qualitative exploration
title_sort insight into the process of postpartum care utilisation and in-home support among vulnerable women in the netherlands: an in-depth qualitative exploration
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046696
work_keys_str_mv AT laureijlyzettet insightintotheprocessofpostpartumcareutilisationandinhomesupportamongvulnerablewomeninthenetherlandsanindepthqualitativeexploration
AT vanderhulstmarije insightintotheprocessofpostpartumcareutilisationandinhomesupportamongvulnerablewomeninthenetherlandsanindepthqualitativeexploration
AT lagendijkjacqueline insightintotheprocessofpostpartumcareutilisationandinhomesupportamongvulnerablewomeninthenetherlandsanindepthqualitativeexploration
AT beenjasperv insightintotheprocessofpostpartumcareutilisationandinhomesupportamongvulnerablewomeninthenetherlandsanindepthqualitativeexploration
AT ernstsmelthiskee insightintotheprocessofpostpartumcareutilisationandinhomesupportamongvulnerablewomeninthenetherlandsanindepthqualitativeexploration
AT franxarie insightintotheprocessofpostpartumcareutilisationandinhomesupportamongvulnerablewomeninthenetherlandsanindepthqualitativeexploration
AT lugtenbergmarjolein insightintotheprocessofpostpartumcareutilisationandinhomesupportamongvulnerablewomeninthenetherlandsanindepthqualitativeexploration