Cargando…

Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: Myocardial protection is essential for successful cardiac surgery, and the search for an ideal cardioplegic solution has continued since its beginning. In this context, Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido are single-dose cardioplegic solutions with good safety profiles and great...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeida, Adriana Silveira, Ceron, Rafael Oliveira, Anschau, Fernando, Kopittke, Luciane, Lira, Kathize Betti, Delvaux, Renan Senandes, Rode, Juarez, Rey, Rafael Antônio Widholzer, Wittke, Estefânia Inês, Rombaldi, Alfeu Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047942
_version_ 1783749263504703488
author Almeida, Adriana Silveira
Ceron, Rafael Oliveira
Anschau, Fernando
Kopittke, Luciane
Lira, Kathize Betti
Delvaux, Renan Senandes
Rode, Juarez
Rey, Rafael Antônio Widholzer
Wittke, Estefânia Inês
Rombaldi, Alfeu Roberto
author_facet Almeida, Adriana Silveira
Ceron, Rafael Oliveira
Anschau, Fernando
Kopittke, Luciane
Lira, Kathize Betti
Delvaux, Renan Senandes
Rode, Juarez
Rey, Rafael Antônio Widholzer
Wittke, Estefânia Inês
Rombaldi, Alfeu Roberto
author_sort Almeida, Adriana Silveira
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Myocardial protection is essential for successful cardiac surgery, and the search for an ideal cardioplegic solution has continued since its beginning. In this context, Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido are single-dose cardioplegic solutions with good safety profiles and great relevance in modern surgical practice. While these solutions have all been evaluated for their impact on patient outcomes independently, limited research exists comparing them directly. Thus, the present study aims to examine the effects of these cardioplegic solutions on myocardial protection and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The assessment of the increase in myocardial injury biomarkers in patients submitted to all treatment methods may be considered a major strength of our study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a clinical trial study protocol that will compare myocardial protection and clinical outcomes among three patient groups based on which cardioplegic solution was used. Patients will be randomised to receive del Nido (n=30), modified del Nido (n=30) or Custodiol (n=30). Myocardial injury biomarkers will be measured at the baseline and 2 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours after the cardiopulmonary bypass. Clinical outcomes will be assessed during the trans operative period and the intensive care unit stay, in addition to other haematological parameters. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol and its related documents were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Brazil, registered under no. 4.029.545. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal in the related field. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RBR-7g5s66.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8422325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84223252021-09-22 Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial Almeida, Adriana Silveira Ceron, Rafael Oliveira Anschau, Fernando Kopittke, Luciane Lira, Kathize Betti Delvaux, Renan Senandes Rode, Juarez Rey, Rafael Antônio Widholzer Wittke, Estefânia Inês Rombaldi, Alfeu Roberto BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Myocardial protection is essential for successful cardiac surgery, and the search for an ideal cardioplegic solution has continued since its beginning. In this context, Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido are single-dose cardioplegic solutions with good safety profiles and great relevance in modern surgical practice. While these solutions have all been evaluated for their impact on patient outcomes independently, limited research exists comparing them directly. Thus, the present study aims to examine the effects of these cardioplegic solutions on myocardial protection and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The assessment of the increase in myocardial injury biomarkers in patients submitted to all treatment methods may be considered a major strength of our study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a clinical trial study protocol that will compare myocardial protection and clinical outcomes among three patient groups based on which cardioplegic solution was used. Patients will be randomised to receive del Nido (n=30), modified del Nido (n=30) or Custodiol (n=30). Myocardial injury biomarkers will be measured at the baseline and 2 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours after the cardiopulmonary bypass. Clinical outcomes will be assessed during the trans operative period and the intensive care unit stay, in addition to other haematological parameters. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol and its related documents were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Brazil, registered under no. 4.029.545. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal in the related field. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RBR-7g5s66. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8422325/ /pubmed/34489276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047942 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Surgery
Almeida, Adriana Silveira
Ceron, Rafael Oliveira
Anschau, Fernando
Kopittke, Luciane
Lira, Kathize Betti
Delvaux, Renan Senandes
Rode, Juarez
Rey, Rafael Antônio Widholzer
Wittke, Estefânia Inês
Rombaldi, Alfeu Roberto
Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial
title Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial
title_full Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial
title_short Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial
title_sort comparison between custodiol, del nido and modified del nido in the myocardial protection - cardioplegia trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047942
work_keys_str_mv AT almeidaadrianasilveira comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT ceronrafaeloliveira comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT anschaufernando comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT kopittkeluciane comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT lirakathizebetti comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT delvauxrenansenandes comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT rodejuarez comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT reyrafaelantoniowidholzer comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT wittkeestefaniaines comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial
AT rombaldialfeuroberto comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial