Cargando…
Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial
INTRODUCTION: Myocardial protection is essential for successful cardiac surgery, and the search for an ideal cardioplegic solution has continued since its beginning. In this context, Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido are single-dose cardioplegic solutions with good safety profiles and great...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047942 |
_version_ | 1783749263504703488 |
---|---|
author | Almeida, Adriana Silveira Ceron, Rafael Oliveira Anschau, Fernando Kopittke, Luciane Lira, Kathize Betti Delvaux, Renan Senandes Rode, Juarez Rey, Rafael Antônio Widholzer Wittke, Estefânia Inês Rombaldi, Alfeu Roberto |
author_facet | Almeida, Adriana Silveira Ceron, Rafael Oliveira Anschau, Fernando Kopittke, Luciane Lira, Kathize Betti Delvaux, Renan Senandes Rode, Juarez Rey, Rafael Antônio Widholzer Wittke, Estefânia Inês Rombaldi, Alfeu Roberto |
author_sort | Almeida, Adriana Silveira |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Myocardial protection is essential for successful cardiac surgery, and the search for an ideal cardioplegic solution has continued since its beginning. In this context, Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido are single-dose cardioplegic solutions with good safety profiles and great relevance in modern surgical practice. While these solutions have all been evaluated for their impact on patient outcomes independently, limited research exists comparing them directly. Thus, the present study aims to examine the effects of these cardioplegic solutions on myocardial protection and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The assessment of the increase in myocardial injury biomarkers in patients submitted to all treatment methods may be considered a major strength of our study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a clinical trial study protocol that will compare myocardial protection and clinical outcomes among three patient groups based on which cardioplegic solution was used. Patients will be randomised to receive del Nido (n=30), modified del Nido (n=30) or Custodiol (n=30). Myocardial injury biomarkers will be measured at the baseline and 2 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours after the cardiopulmonary bypass. Clinical outcomes will be assessed during the trans operative period and the intensive care unit stay, in addition to other haematological parameters. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol and its related documents were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Brazil, registered under no. 4.029.545. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal in the related field. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RBR-7g5s66. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8422325 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-84223252021-09-22 Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial Almeida, Adriana Silveira Ceron, Rafael Oliveira Anschau, Fernando Kopittke, Luciane Lira, Kathize Betti Delvaux, Renan Senandes Rode, Juarez Rey, Rafael Antônio Widholzer Wittke, Estefânia Inês Rombaldi, Alfeu Roberto BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Myocardial protection is essential for successful cardiac surgery, and the search for an ideal cardioplegic solution has continued since its beginning. In this context, Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido are single-dose cardioplegic solutions with good safety profiles and great relevance in modern surgical practice. While these solutions have all been evaluated for their impact on patient outcomes independently, limited research exists comparing them directly. Thus, the present study aims to examine the effects of these cardioplegic solutions on myocardial protection and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. The assessment of the increase in myocardial injury biomarkers in patients submitted to all treatment methods may be considered a major strength of our study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a clinical trial study protocol that will compare myocardial protection and clinical outcomes among three patient groups based on which cardioplegic solution was used. Patients will be randomised to receive del Nido (n=30), modified del Nido (n=30) or Custodiol (n=30). Myocardial injury biomarkers will be measured at the baseline and 2 hours, 12 hours and 24 hours after the cardiopulmonary bypass. Clinical outcomes will be assessed during the trans operative period and the intensive care unit stay, in addition to other haematological parameters. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol and its related documents were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceição, Brazil, registered under no. 4.029.545. The findings of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal in the related field. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RBR-7g5s66. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8422325/ /pubmed/34489276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047942 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Surgery Almeida, Adriana Silveira Ceron, Rafael Oliveira Anschau, Fernando Kopittke, Luciane Lira, Kathize Betti Delvaux, Renan Senandes Rode, Juarez Rey, Rafael Antônio Widholzer Wittke, Estefânia Inês Rombaldi, Alfeu Roberto Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial |
title | Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial |
title_full | Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial |
title_short | Comparison between Custodiol, del Nido and modified del Nido in the myocardial protection - Cardioplegia Trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial |
title_sort | comparison between custodiol, del nido and modified del nido in the myocardial protection - cardioplegia trial: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind clinical trial |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422325/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34489276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047942 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almeidaadrianasilveira comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT ceronrafaeloliveira comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT anschaufernando comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT kopittkeluciane comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT lirakathizebetti comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT delvauxrenansenandes comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT rodejuarez comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT reyrafaelantoniowidholzer comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT wittkeestefaniaines comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial AT rombaldialfeuroberto comparisonbetweencustodioldelnidoandmodifieddelnidointhemyocardialprotectioncardioplegiatrialastudyprotocolforarandomiseddoubleblindclinicaltrial |