Cargando…

Pediatric shunt revision analysis within the first year of shunt placement: A single center experience

BACKGROUND: Hydrocephalus is a common problem in neurosurgery with shunt placement remains the mainstay of the management. However, shunt placement generally requires following surgical procedures, including shunt revision. Despite the recent developments, the incidence of shunt failure remains high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azzam, Muhammad, Wathoni, Roidah Taqiyya Zahra, Suryaningtyas, Wihasto, Parenrengi, Muhammad Arifin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513183
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_283_2021
_version_ 1783749284574789632
author Azzam, Muhammad
Wathoni, Roidah Taqiyya Zahra
Suryaningtyas, Wihasto
Parenrengi, Muhammad Arifin
author_facet Azzam, Muhammad
Wathoni, Roidah Taqiyya Zahra
Suryaningtyas, Wihasto
Parenrengi, Muhammad Arifin
author_sort Azzam, Muhammad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hydrocephalus is a common problem in neurosurgery with shunt placement remains the mainstay of the management. However, shunt placement generally requires following surgical procedures, including shunt revision. Despite the recent developments, the incidence of shunt failure remains high, approximately 30–51% in the 1(st) year following the shunt placement. METHODS: An observational retrospective study of pediatric neurosurgery patients whom underwent CSF shunting procedure, both primary and repeated VPS, VAS, CPS, and subdural-peritoneal shunt procedures between January 2018 and May 2019. The patients were observed for 12 months for potential complication requiring shunt revision following the shunt placement. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients underwent shunt placement. The shunt revision within 12 months was found in 26 patients (18.3%), 25 cases were VPS (96.2%) and one case was CPS (3.8%). The mean period of time between shunt placement to shunt revision was 3.96 months. Age of under 6 months old during the shunt placement showed significantly higher risk for shunt revision (RR 2.32 CI 1.13–4.74, P = 0.018). The most common diagnosis requiring shunt revision was congenital anomaly (16 cases, 61.5%). The most common cause of revision was shunt malfunction, with 21 cases (80.8%) followed by infected shunt with 5 cases (19.2%). CONCLUSION: The 1(st) year observation showed relatively high rate for shunt revision. The patient underwent shunt procedure should be regularly followed up in long period for better evaluation of the outcome. The application of shunt registry in some countries appears to be efficient and beneficial for sustainable follow-up in patients underwent shunt placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8422432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84224322021-09-09 Pediatric shunt revision analysis within the first year of shunt placement: A single center experience Azzam, Muhammad Wathoni, Roidah Taqiyya Zahra Suryaningtyas, Wihasto Parenrengi, Muhammad Arifin Surg Neurol Int Original Article BACKGROUND: Hydrocephalus is a common problem in neurosurgery with shunt placement remains the mainstay of the management. However, shunt placement generally requires following surgical procedures, including shunt revision. Despite the recent developments, the incidence of shunt failure remains high, approximately 30–51% in the 1(st) year following the shunt placement. METHODS: An observational retrospective study of pediatric neurosurgery patients whom underwent CSF shunting procedure, both primary and repeated VPS, VAS, CPS, and subdural-peritoneal shunt procedures between January 2018 and May 2019. The patients were observed for 12 months for potential complication requiring shunt revision following the shunt placement. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients underwent shunt placement. The shunt revision within 12 months was found in 26 patients (18.3%), 25 cases were VPS (96.2%) and one case was CPS (3.8%). The mean period of time between shunt placement to shunt revision was 3.96 months. Age of under 6 months old during the shunt placement showed significantly higher risk for shunt revision (RR 2.32 CI 1.13–4.74, P = 0.018). The most common diagnosis requiring shunt revision was congenital anomaly (16 cases, 61.5%). The most common cause of revision was shunt malfunction, with 21 cases (80.8%) followed by infected shunt with 5 cases (19.2%). CONCLUSION: The 1(st) year observation showed relatively high rate for shunt revision. The patient underwent shunt procedure should be regularly followed up in long period for better evaluation of the outcome. The application of shunt registry in some countries appears to be efficient and beneficial for sustainable follow-up in patients underwent shunt placement. Scientific Scholar 2021-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8422432/ /pubmed/34513183 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_283_2021 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Azzam, Muhammad
Wathoni, Roidah Taqiyya Zahra
Suryaningtyas, Wihasto
Parenrengi, Muhammad Arifin
Pediatric shunt revision analysis within the first year of shunt placement: A single center experience
title Pediatric shunt revision analysis within the first year of shunt placement: A single center experience
title_full Pediatric shunt revision analysis within the first year of shunt placement: A single center experience
title_fullStr Pediatric shunt revision analysis within the first year of shunt placement: A single center experience
title_full_unstemmed Pediatric shunt revision analysis within the first year of shunt placement: A single center experience
title_short Pediatric shunt revision analysis within the first year of shunt placement: A single center experience
title_sort pediatric shunt revision analysis within the first year of shunt placement: a single center experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34513183
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_283_2021
work_keys_str_mv AT azzammuhammad pediatricshuntrevisionanalysiswithinthefirstyearofshuntplacementasinglecenterexperience
AT wathoniroidahtaqiyyazahra pediatricshuntrevisionanalysiswithinthefirstyearofshuntplacementasinglecenterexperience
AT suryaningtyaswihasto pediatricshuntrevisionanalysiswithinthefirstyearofshuntplacementasinglecenterexperience
AT parenrengimuhammadarifin pediatricshuntrevisionanalysiswithinthefirstyearofshuntplacementasinglecenterexperience