Cargando…

Impact of cytopathology authors work: Comparative analysis based on Open-access cytopathology publications versus non-Open-access conventional publications

OBJECTIVES: Open access (OA) is based on a set of principles and a range of practices through which fruits of research are distributed online, free of cost, or other access barriers. According to the 2001 definition, OA publications are without barriers to copy or reuse with free access to readers....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolpekwar, Janavi A., Shidham, Vinod B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512791
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_32_2021
_version_ 1783749287867318272
author Kolpekwar, Janavi A.
Shidham, Vinod B.
author_facet Kolpekwar, Janavi A.
Shidham, Vinod B.
author_sort Kolpekwar, Janavi A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Open access (OA) is based on a set of principles and a range of practices through which fruits of research are distributed online, free of cost, or other access barriers. According to the 2001 definition, OA publications are without barriers to copy or reuse with free access to readers. Some studies have reported higher rates of citation for OA publications. In this study, we analyzed the citation rates of OA and traditional nonOA (with or without free access) publications for authors publishing in the subspecialty of cytopathology during 2010–2015. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We observed and compared citation patterns for authors who had published in both OA and traditional non-OA, peer-reviewed, scientific, cytopathology journals. Thirty authors were randomly selected with criteria of publishing a total of at least five cytopathology articles over 2010–2015. Number of citations per article (CPA) (during 2010–2015) for OA publications (in CytoJournal and Journal of Cytology) and non-OA publications (in Diagnostic Cytopathology, Cytopathology, Acta Cytologica, Journal of American of Cytopathology, and Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology) was collected and compared statistically using two-tailed Student’s t-est. The data were collected manually through science citation analysis sites, mostly Google Scholar. RESULTS: Thirty authors published 579 cytopathology articles in OA and non-OA journals. Average CPA for OA publications was 26.64. This was 11.35 higher than the average CPA) of non-OA conventional with subscription cytopathology journals (74% increase) and 11.76 higher than the average CPA of conventional cytopathology non-OA journal articles with free access (79% increase). These differences were statistically significantly with P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: We observed that the cytopathology publications in the OA journal attained a higher rate of CPA than the publications in the traditional non-OA journals in the field of cytopathology during 2010–2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8422447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-84224472021-09-09 Impact of cytopathology authors work: Comparative analysis based on Open-access cytopathology publications versus non-Open-access conventional publications Kolpekwar, Janavi A. Shidham, Vinod B. Cytojournal Research Article OBJECTIVES: Open access (OA) is based on a set of principles and a range of practices through which fruits of research are distributed online, free of cost, or other access barriers. According to the 2001 definition, OA publications are without barriers to copy or reuse with free access to readers. Some studies have reported higher rates of citation for OA publications. In this study, we analyzed the citation rates of OA and traditional nonOA (with or without free access) publications for authors publishing in the subspecialty of cytopathology during 2010–2015. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We observed and compared citation patterns for authors who had published in both OA and traditional non-OA, peer-reviewed, scientific, cytopathology journals. Thirty authors were randomly selected with criteria of publishing a total of at least five cytopathology articles over 2010–2015. Number of citations per article (CPA) (during 2010–2015) for OA publications (in CytoJournal and Journal of Cytology) and non-OA publications (in Diagnostic Cytopathology, Cytopathology, Acta Cytologica, Journal of American of Cytopathology, and Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology) was collected and compared statistically using two-tailed Student’s t-est. The data were collected manually through science citation analysis sites, mostly Google Scholar. RESULTS: Thirty authors published 579 cytopathology articles in OA and non-OA journals. Average CPA for OA publications was 26.64. This was 11.35 higher than the average CPA) of non-OA conventional with subscription cytopathology journals (74% increase) and 11.76 higher than the average CPA of conventional cytopathology non-OA journal articles with free access (79% increase). These differences were statistically significantly with P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: We observed that the cytopathology publications in the OA journal attained a higher rate of CPA than the publications in the traditional non-OA journals in the field of cytopathology during 2010–2015. Scientific Scholar 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8422447/ /pubmed/34512791 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_32_2021 Text en © 2021 Cytopathology Foundation Inc, Published by Scientific Scholar https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kolpekwar, Janavi A.
Shidham, Vinod B.
Impact of cytopathology authors work: Comparative analysis based on Open-access cytopathology publications versus non-Open-access conventional publications
title Impact of cytopathology authors work: Comparative analysis based on Open-access cytopathology publications versus non-Open-access conventional publications
title_full Impact of cytopathology authors work: Comparative analysis based on Open-access cytopathology publications versus non-Open-access conventional publications
title_fullStr Impact of cytopathology authors work: Comparative analysis based on Open-access cytopathology publications versus non-Open-access conventional publications
title_full_unstemmed Impact of cytopathology authors work: Comparative analysis based on Open-access cytopathology publications versus non-Open-access conventional publications
title_short Impact of cytopathology authors work: Comparative analysis based on Open-access cytopathology publications versus non-Open-access conventional publications
title_sort impact of cytopathology authors work: comparative analysis based on open-access cytopathology publications versus non-open-access conventional publications
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8422447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34512791
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_32_2021
work_keys_str_mv AT kolpekwarjanavia impactofcytopathologyauthorsworkcomparativeanalysisbasedonopenaccesscytopathologypublicationsversusnonopenaccessconventionalpublications
AT shidhamvinodb impactofcytopathologyauthorsworkcomparativeanalysisbasedonopenaccesscytopathologypublicationsversusnonopenaccessconventionalpublications